the point that actually a lot of countries sometimes use their privacy laws a little bit to handicap americacompanies where they drive towards data localization, requirements that you hold the data on country which is fragmenting the global reach of american companies. so there is -- i mean, we have definitely done well out of the global reach of data and to be honest you do have to have a globally more or less seemless set of rules because if you have a lot of fragments rules you don't have an internet, you have many internets, so i do think we benefit from that. we do need to, however, recognize that countries do have an interest in protecting citizens and i think part of what what we are talking about, democratic countries, how do we synchronize a way to have a kind of a common picture of what the rules are that govern data and -- and what the rules of the road ought to be so we don't wind up with conflicting situations in terms of how we -- we manage the data. so i think that that's going to continue to be a big a thing, now, i don't believe in tariffs. and i think on balance free trade

handicapped. you don't want them to see it as defiance. in america somebody to be killed if you're defiant. why didn't you just do what they said? why are you defiant? i don't want to be one of those guys who show pictures so i can humanize my son. so i always try to instill a sense of fear in him. so the book is really not an indictment of society as an inspection. >> trevor: when you look at the book from cover to cover, what do you hope people will take way from it? some might day dl, i already know the morbid world we're living in and the harsh realities. like, what am i getting from the book that i may not be getting from everyone else's conversations. >> first off, i laugh, because it's very funny. i know it doesn't seem like it now. but second, i think you will recognize some things. the only way that we can guarantee ethat they are not -- like, we can't keep having these kinds of things happen and everybody kind of go that's the way things are, because we can't pretend to be a society. you can't say in a society that we're all about justice a

america i knew. i am 67 years old. i have been a public school teacher for 38 years, retired. i have a mentally handicappedampaign saw the ran and itld trump amazed me when she looked at me. i did not even think she was paying attention and it amazed me when she looked at me and said to me when he made fun of the journalist. bully.d, mommy, he is a i don't know where america has gone. -- by thisdened and entire thing. i just don't get it anymore. host: that is susan in tampa and we stay in tampa with kenneth, an independent. go ahead. caller: good morning. how are you? host: i am doing well. go ahead. caller: i am glad it is open phones. we are both from florida. i agree with the lady who called from tampa also. it is like.ine is i wish you guys could do a show on some of the things -- i know you do a lot of things on what this president be saying. when he calls an individual a do his supporters -- do they agree with that? could care less what a lot of people view about him calling a woman a dog and do they support that if it was someone in their family or themselves that he would call a dog? what so many

america became of a never more inclusive society the u.s. welcomed immigrants and protected workers and to ensure the civil rights of citizens to make public space accessible to the handicapped with the ideals of justice and the u.s. a prima court drastically reversed the seven unelected justices they deprived every human being for the first nine months of their life on the fundamental human right and the right to life. there are a lot of the progressive elizabeth warren democrats that agree that legal abortion. and so did you find letters or other evidence of the antiabortion views? >> eunice shriver was nothing if not consistent she opposed abortion just as she opposed capital punishment. she was grounded in the catholic church all of life you just cannot lead part of that away. she was a pragmatist she tried valiantly and unsuccessfully with those supporters to get kennedy to stay on board. so after 73 he and the democratic party change places looking at eunice kennedy shriver she lives the most modern times but the opposition to abortion was a liberal and progressive position and they denounced abortion because of genocide and it was a way to keep down that population it