supervisor haney. >> i want to thank you, mr. flynn, and thank the city attorney's office for their proactive and necessary work on this and the broader investigation. this is a very awful time for our city when we are continuing to have these kind of allegations of corruption. it seems to me that we clearly need to be able to take action against individuals and companies who are charged with corrupt behaviors and ensure that they are not getting further contracts with the city during that time. one question i had was about another maybe it is a slightly different category. the situation that involves rod regoes santos. he has been charged. he is not exactly a contractor in the same way but there were reports of mr. santos continuing to pull permits and engage with d.b.i. in various ways. would a situation like that be covered under this ordinance? what is the scope of engagement that is included that could be suspended while somebody is under investigation or has been indicted? >> that is a great issue. de barment is a process b

>> no. >> supervisor haney: the workforce is getting 3.5% next year. >> correct. >> supervisor haney:the police will get 3%. and if we were -- if it was a negotiation to give them less than that, it could go to arbitration, in which an -- through that process, that's how it would be decided? >> and, i know, depending on what's happening in other police agencies, that could have an impact. now we know city employees are getting a 3.5% wage increase. that will be a factor. so we actually -- when i say we believe we delivered to you a very good deal, we did deliver you a good deal. on its terms. a lot of dissatisfaction ta it's not tied to other financial issues. which is what we've been talking about. >> supervisor haney: can you -- and then i'll -- this is the last question i'll ask for now. and then i do want to hear from public comment, which could spur other questions. but the overtime policy, can you speak to what this change is. and are there specific estimates of -- cost estimates of savings associated with it? >> so the -- so the change to the attendee overtime is we were notici

>> no. >> supervisor haney: the workforce is getting 3.5% next year. >> correct. >> supervisor haney:the police will get 3%. and if we were -- if it was a negotiation to give them less than that, it could go to arbitration, in which an -- through that process, that's how it would be decided? >> and, i know, depending on what's happening in other police agencies, that could have an impact. now we know city employees are getting a 3.5% wage increase. that will be a factor. so we actually -- when i say we believe we delivered to you a very good deal, we did deliver you a good deal. on its terms. a lot of dissatisfaction ta it's not tied to other financial issues. which is what we've been talking about. >> supervisor haney: can you -- and then i'll -- this is the last question i'll ask for now. and then i do want to hear from public comment, which could spur other questions. but the overtime policy, can you speak to what this change is. and are there specific estimates of -- cost estimates of savings associated with it? >> so the -- so the change to the attendee overtime is we were notici

. >> haney absent. >> we have a quorum. >> haney is present also. >> commissioner haney is present. 11 are present. we have a quorum. >> do you have any announcements. >> i would like to make a comment about public comment. it will be available for each item. call (415)655-0001. you will be able to listen to the meeting as a participant. please allow for audio visual delays and 30 second live time during the course of the meeting. >> thank you. i will move to the chair's report. mostly good and happy news this month. we are pleased to celebrate two milestones for our transportation authority. one for the agency itself and one for a special staff member who has been here from almost the beginning. this year marks the 30th anniversary of the half cent sales tax program as one of the early self-help counties in the state of california. i want to thank the san francisco voters for twice approving the sales tax for transportation three decades ago in the form of prop b, which was then after its expiration revoted as prop k which is the program we administrator and remains a vital source of

supervisor haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you, president yee, and supervisor ronen, for those comments. this has, as everyone has said, been such a critical part of our response as a city and is directly connected to some of the successes that we've had in preventing the spread of the virus. we've seen very early on a rapid spread in our congregate shelters. we've seen the virus spread among vulnerable populations, and so it is the people, together with h.s.h. in uni so that this is unconscionable, and infeasible. this plan, to the extent there's a clear plan, is dangerous. so what i want to ask is a general question and then, i have some specific budget questions to director stewart kahn. today, the mayor decided to pause some of the activities related to reopening, and i wonder if you could comment on whether we should similarly consider to pause this plan of demobilizing the s.i.p. hotels in approximate a similar way for similar reasons, which is the ongoing threat that this virus poses to residents of our city. >> president yee: director stewart kahn? >> thank you, supervisor haney

supervisor haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you. many of the questions i was going to ask were asked. i a couple -- a little bit more specific ones. in terms of what we're allowed to share publicly or disclose or do any sort of -- maybe even more intentional outreach to individuals who may be, you know, working with or signed up with one of these individuals, that we're concerned about. is any of that changed, if that person has been indicted criminally? is there anything that we can do in that case? i mean, you know, if somebody is working with rodrigo santos, for example, or somebody in that situation, can we disclose more proactively to them or to -- to their clients or potential clients that he has been criminally indicted. does that change what we're able to do at all from a due process perspective? >> i think the information that the city would be sharing would be information that has caused the city to become concerned about concerned about these advices, which is based on a review of the violations they might have been assoc

supervisor haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you. many of the questions i was going to ask were asked. i a couple -- a little bit more specific ones. in terms of what we're allowed to share publicly or disclose or do any sort of -- maybe even more intentional outreach to individuals who may be, you know, working with or signed up with one of these individuals, that we're concerned about. is any of that changed, if that person has been indicted criminally? is there anything that we can do in that case? i mean, you know, if somebody is working with rodrigo santos, for example, or somebody in that situation, can we disclose more proactively to them or to -- to their clients or potential clients that he has been criminally indicted. does that change what we're able to do at all from a due process perspective? >> i think the information that the city would be sharing would be information that has caused the city to become concerned about concerned about these advices, which is based on a review of the violations they might have been assoc

supervisor haney? >> supervisor haney: first, kathy, thank you for your leadership and your extraordinary work as the head of the yerba buena c.b.d. i think the c.b.d. has a lot of unique programming that you do, and every c.b.d. is different in its own way, but i really appreciate that you take the advantage of and collaborate with the many arts organizations -- >> supervisor haney: the contract that the city has with recology, either as a result of the way the contract is framed or [inaudible] for trash that is collected -- that you all are charged essentially as though it's trash that is your own trash, like, trash that came from your building, and that seems to me to be probably unfair because you're picking up trash that didn't come from your bins or your trash, and i think it speaks to your role that you all have in keeping our city clean. could you speak to that and have you've had any conversations with recology. it doesn't seem right for you to pick up trash that came from your neighborhood or

supervisor haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you. many of the questions i was going to ask were asked. i a couple -- a little bit more specific ones. in terms of what we're allowed to share publicly or disclose or do any sort of -- maybe even more intentional outreach to individuals who may be, you know, working with or signed up with one of these individuals, that we're concerned about. is any of that changed, if that person has been indicted criminally? is there anything that we can do in that case? i mean, you know, if somebody is working with rodrigo santos, for example, or somebody in that situation, can we disclose more proactively to them or to -- to their clients or potential clients that he has been criminally indicted. does that change what we're able to do at all from a due process perspective? >> i think the information that the city would be sharing would be information that has caused the city to become concerned about concerned about these advices, which is based on a review of the violations they might have been assoc

supervisor haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you. many of the questions i was going to ask were asked. i a couple -- a little bit more specific ones. in terms of what we're allowed to share publicly or disclose or do any sort of -- maybe even more intentional outreach to individuals who may be, you know, working with or signed up with one of these individuals, that we're concerned about. is any of that changed, if that person has been indicted criminally? is there anything that we can do in that case? i mean, you know, if somebody is working with rodrigo santos, for example, or somebody in that situation, can we disclose more proactively to them or to -- to their clients or potential clients that he has been criminally indicted. does that change what we're able to do at all from a due process perspective? >> i think the information that the city would be sharing would be information that has caused the city to become concerned about concerned about these advices, which is based on a review of the violations they might have been assoc

supervisor haney. supervisor peskin. >> thank you, chair mar. you summarized the recent history very, very well. while this is a missed opportunity in many kays, as you arat this time lated -- articulated. within the pd in the leadership under chief scott as well as in large part because of the pendency of the m.o.u. and ongoing hearings on the d.o.j. recommendations as well as modest children in the leadership of poa, there has been some progress. i think in some part, if i may, because the poa has changed legal council and, finally, gotten a lawyer who is much less obstructive than his predecessor. as a result i believe ms. preston can speak to this. a lot of the frivolous use of meet and confer and other roadblocks that under mires brown the poa have been resolved. i do believe under the leadership of at least the new council to the poa, if not some of the members and leadership of the poa, we have gotten rid of the vast majority of these frivolous meet and confers meant to jam up the system. this doesn't mean this is the way they will contin

supervisor haney. >> i want to thank you, mr. flynn, and thank the city attorney's office for their proactive and necessary work on this and the broader investigation. this is a very awful time for our city when we are continuing to have these kind of allegations of corruption. it seems to me that we clearly need to be able to take action against individuals and companies who are charged with corrupt behaviors and ensure that they are not getting further contracts with the city during that time. one question i had was about another maybe it is a slightly different category. the situation that involves rod regoes santos. he has been charged. he is not exactly a contractor in the same way but there were reports of mr. santos continuing to pull permits and engage with d.b.i. in various ways. would a situation like that be covered under this ordinance? what is the scope of engagement that is included that could be suspended while somebody is under investigation or has been indicted? >> that is a great issue. de barment is a process b

this occurred at matthew haney's district after this insane tenderloin pd shot a man that was 21 years old. she failed to deescalate the situation. there are nine points that they have to abide by. first to come up with a plan in the car. they failed step one. the problem is that paper policies will never ever work. they are dependent upon implementation of officerses in the sfpd. by officers in the sheriff's deputies excuse me. today this is a reminder of the contract i am not allowed to talk about. reforms don't work. they never will. the problem is polices is working as intended. we heard today chief scott did a press conference at this event and he indicated that reforms are implemented. i agree. polices is working as intended. -- polices is working as intended. this evening in district 6 police first shot a man and then the sheriff's deputies proceeded to use a taser. then police used less than lethal. after the man was already on the ground they said lock your weapon. this is the same last words that caesar vargas heard. i hope that in two weeks you may being the right decision.

supervisor haney. >> i won't say too much because we had a long hearing about this in the committee and i appreciate and agree with much of what has been said already. i do want to echo a point from supervisor walton that he just made which is despite what we heard from the mayor's office today, we have heard from our labor partners, our nurses, our health care workers, our muni operators and librarians who have said that again and again they have been threatened with layoffs if we do not approve this m.o.u. that has been their experience. that's what they heard directly from the mayor and for now for us to hear something different contradicts what they've been told directly. we are in a position right now where if we reject this m.o.u., we are going to create an over $10 million hole in our budget. we had heard from our city workers who have sacrificed tremendously during this pandemic that they believe this will lead to layoffs and direct cuts and attacks on them and our city workers. i think for us

commissioner haney?> supervisor haney: thank you, chair peskin, and thank you for this presentation. i first just want to support what commissioner stefani said, and hopefully, we can get one of these lights at geary and goff and just want to echo the concerns that there are a lot of intersections like that around the city that i think could use these cameras. i don't think we have enough of them. when there's a sense that there's only a handful of them, they don't -- they can be more limited in how they impact driver behavior, you know, citywide. if you have a sense that you might be at one where there is a red light camera, and you don't always know that, i think that can have a broader impact on -- on driver behavior. i did want to ask why it takes to long to put these up. you said that we have eight that we are going to put in place, and there's a design phase, which it sounds like it's another year, and we might not have these cred lights up for another two year. can you explain why it can't be done

supervisor haney. >> i want to thank you, mr.flynn, and thank the city attorney's office for their proactive and necessary work on this and the broader investigation. this is a very awful time for our city when we are continuing to have these kind of allegations of corruption. it seems to me that we clearly need to be able to take action against individuals and companies who are charged with corrupt behaviors and ensure that they are not getting further contracts with the city during that time. one question i had was about another maybe it is a slightly different category. the situation that involves rod regoes santos. he has been charged. he is not exactly a contractor in the same way but there were reports of mr. santos continuing to pull permits and engage with d.b.i. in various ways. would a situation like that be covered under this ordinance? what is the scope of engagement that is included that could be suspended while somebody is under investigation or has been indicted? >> that is a great issue. de barment is a process by

well done. >> and director haney? >> supervisor haney: thank you. can you hear me okay? >> yes, it's fine. >> supervisor haney: okay. i just want to echo the sentiments of the other members of the board about how much you will be missed, chair sesay. and you know you are always someone who is so much a professional and on top of everything and fair and just a tremendous leader in our city. and i want to also just thank you for everything that you've done for the huge swath of my district and district 6 and you really left a tremendous legacy here that will shape san francisco for many decades to come. detroit is very lucki to have you. -- lucky to have you. it is a place that obviously has a lot of development and growth and opportunities as well, and we're all excited to see what you do there. i just want to thank you on a personal level for how you led and the partnership, but also to thank you on behalf of the residents of district 6, who will benefit from your work for many years. so thank you. and please do stay in touch. and best of luck. >> j. tumlin: director ses

hock -- commissioner haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair peskin. you may have touched on this to some degree. but are there limitations on the number of vehicles and sort of the scale that once they receive a permit? and to the extent that they are operating in an area, is that required to be shared with us in any way? the city? is that informational, once they're under a permit, they're under a different regulatory structure, they only have to report in that direction? >> just to clarify, if you're talking about the cruise testing permits specifically? there's five -- their application to the d.m.v. and, julia, appreciate if you can jump in as well, allows for five vehicles for testing. and they did have to provide certain notification to the city that they were going to be testing vehicles. as well the application is, of course, public record as well. they can apply for future changes to that. but at the time five vehicles is what is permitted. then the cpuc question i think is a little bit different one. i don't know, julia, if you want to add s

courtney mcdonald is here from supervisor haney's office, so let's hear from her first. >> great. thank you, chair ronen. i'm courtney mcdonald from supervisor matt haney's office, and i want to say thank you and congratulations to mark and julia. we look forward to working with both of you. for the citizen's advisory board, i appreciate your effort, chair ronen, to make sure that we are hearing community members' voices. it's important that we appoint people there to the board that live on the island, and three of the applicants fit that need. the first is hope williams. she's open to community hubs, establish testing, distributed p.p.e. she has really been the heart of organizing on treasure island, and what her application doesn't say that if you need something done on the island, you need hope, you need her right there with you. she has the trust of families and residents on the island from decades of organizing, from habitability to the cleanup, so her voice on the c.a.b. is really important. the second is barklee unitas. he has gone out and sought partnerships to fix the iss

hock -- commissioner haney. >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair peskin. you may have touched on this to some degree. but are there limitations on the number of vehicles and sort of the scale that once they receive a permit? and to the extent that they are operating in an area, is that required to be shared with us in any way? the city? is that informational, once they're under a permit, they're under a different regulatory structure, they only have to report in that direction? >> just to clarify, if you're talking about the cruise testing permits specifically? there's five -- their application to the d.m.v. and, julia, appreciate if you can jump in as well, allows for five vehicles for testing. and they did have to provide certain notification to the city that they were going to be testing vehicles. as well the application is, of course, public record as well. they can apply for future changes to that. but at the time five vehicles is what is permitted. then the cpuc question i think is a little bit different one. i don't know, julia, if you want to add s

i'm supervisor haney, chair of the committee. our clerk today is erica major. madam clerk, do you have any announcements? >> yes, due to the covid-19 health emergency, the board of supervisors legislative chamber and room are closed. members will be participating in the meeting reportedly. this is taken pure pursuant to the state and local directives. members will participate in the committee as in the same extent as physically present. depending on your provider, cable channel 26 or 78 or 99 or sfgov.org are streaming the call in number across the screen. each speaker will be allowed 2 minutes to speak. you can call the number 415-655-0001, access code: 146-414-8285. press pound and pound after you enter the meeting i.d. when connected you will hear the meeting discussions and you will be muted in listening mode only. when your item of interest comes up, dial star and 3 to be added to the speaker line. best practices are to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television or radio. alternatively you may submit public comment i

cost some money and then there's some new things on the way this weekend next week supervisor matt haney tells me that the city is working to expand its testing capacity the days following thanksgiving. >>again, san francisco urges people to go to private providers if they can you can head to our website kron 4 dot com for a list of those other options in san francisco taylor kron 4 news. >>to the east bay now contra costa county is reporting more than a 100 complaints related to covid-19 health orders just in the past 10 days which is in part the reason why contra costa county has moved back into the purple tier, the most restrictive phase of the reopening process in california. now without roll back the county's covid-19 task force is focusing on stricter enforcement. >>that restaurants, but it can be be you know things like a cross fit the lawn. it can be outdoor dining where there's not social they can be indoor which now isn't allowed. you know how hard it is for businesses right now. we want to support them. but ultimately they need to follow public health guidance that's really im

commissioner haney? >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair peskin, and thank you for this work and outreach. one of the questions that i had was if there were outreach to people who drive? i imagine the differences of opinions may be pretty vast between people who do not have cars and do not drive and those who do live in these neighborhoods, and i wonder if, based on the data you've been able to collect so far, whether you've been able to speak with a significant number of people who -- residents who are regular drivers, and connected to that, people who may be -- own or work at small businesses or businesses in these neighborhoods, how you are reaching these individuals. obviously, these perspectives are important, as are the people who don't fall into those categories, but i know that the concerns about this that i've heard, of course, have come from people who drive, and i think we need to understand their experiences and what they -- what they want to see, as well -- including if there are certain, y

and also that would be a good direction to me of how i can engage with supervisor haney's office and other members of the board on this legislation to further your policy determinations on this. however, obviously future agenda items could be agdsized. this could come before you again if you wanted that or you feel like you will have a consensus on what you think the best outcome is, you could communicate that through a motion and i will do my best with the board to carry that out. that wraps up what i wanted to present to you and i'm glad to answer any questions that you might have. >> thank you, pat. what i would like to do, because you do have two very specific recommendations for us to consider, aye like to take them separately so that we have a very clear and complete discussion about your proposal -- >> [inaudible]. >> city officials and employees from soliciting behested payments from interested parties which i think is something we have seen similar in the legislation that supervisor haney had initially introduced and then, second, take your recommendation that we expand our

commissioner haney? >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair peskin, and thank you for this work and outreach. one of the questions that i had was if there were outreach to people who drive? i imagine the differences of opinions may be pretty vast between people who do not have cars and do not drive and those who do live in these neighborhoods, and i wonder if, based on the data you've been able to collect so far, whether you've been able to speak with a significant number of people who -- residents who are regular drivers, and connected to that, people who may be -- own or work at small businesses or businesses in these neighborhoods, how you are reaching these individuals. obviously, these perspectives are important, as are the people who don't fall into those categories, but i know that the concerns about this that i've heard, of course, have come from people who drive, and i think we need to understand their experiences and what they -- what they want to see, as well -- including if there are certain, y

haney were on the island on sunday. and again congratulations to fei tsen, who is -- [indiscernible] she is doing a fantastic job. i wish that commissioners could see those desks and to be giving to those kids. again we're going beyond the call of duty here. and people that work with us, with the resident of treasure island, so i just wanted to put out a statement. thank you. >> director tsen: thank you, linda. and, yes, that event on saturday was organized by sue boyce. i also like to give a shout-out to the two men who started this project on their own time, you know, with their own resources. and it's mike and paul, who built those desks for kids and to the fire department for bringing their fire engines so that they could deliver to the kids as well. we certainly appreciate people who really -- it embodies the spirit of community. and we appreciate the efforts. thank you. any other comments? okay. hearing none, next item, please. i'm sorry. dom we have -- do we have any public comment on the director's report? >> cl

commissioner haney? >> supervisor haney: thank you, chair peskin, and thank you for this work and outreach. one of the questions that i had was if there were outreach to people who drive? i imagine the differences of opinions may be pretty vast between people who do not have cars and do not drive and those who do live in these neighborhoods, and i wonder if, based on the data you've been able to collect so far, whether you've been able to speak with a significant number of people who -- residents who are regular drivers, and connected to that, people who may be -- own or work at small businesses or businesses in these neighborhoods, how you are reaching these individuals. obviously, these perspectives are important, as are the people who don't fall into those categories, but i know that the concerns about this that i've heard, of course, have come from people who drive, and i think we need to understand their experiences and what they -- what they want to see, as well -- including if there are certain, y

i guess chair haney, is there a way to talk about some of the hubs are opening up? i heard college prep, they will be opening up for high schools to provide tutoring or support. it may not be everyday. it's not a child care issue, but it is middle and high school students need support while we're ramping up. there is still a need. i'm wondering if we could get a report on what are the ways that the city can partner to support students to make sure that while we're getting -- we're going to be bringing in kindergartners first. so what about our juniors and seniors? that's a concern. i would like our staff to share with you all the mechanism that we are identifying students that are falling off the map is call coordinated care. it's required by the state and every school is suppose to be tracking which kids are just not showing up. we as a district are supposed to have a tiered model of intervention to get them connected. ultimately if we're successful in our school reopening plan and i appreciate the resolution that commissioner lopez and cook reported, we want to se

clearly a victory for haney. not necessarily a defeat but except her authority will be lessened by this. >> reporter: voters also on pace to approve $487 million in bonds to pay for housing for the homeless, parks, and cleaner streets. new taxes on high dollar real estate transactions and high- earning executives. >> there was opposition, but i think these are voters trusting their politicians a little bit, right? especially when it comes to bonds and raising taxes. >> reporter: the races for supervisors are still shaking out. maintainings the progressive super majority or adds allies may still be days away. >> i expect it will be longer than three or four days. it might be a week or so. >> reporter: san francisco voted in favor of california proposition 18. the failed statewide amendment that would have allowed 17-year- olds to vote in primaries if they turn 18 by the general election. those same voters appear to be rejecting proposition g which would allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote. the results are close and