pahlsson. gina was at the trial today. she joins me now from washington. now gina this is a new trial, but not a new concept. hankberg said that aig was held to a different standard than even the banks in terms of their culpability, their responsibility for triggering the crisis, and that they were treated unfairly. what is the meat of this argument? >> yeah, you are right. he is arguing that aig got much harsher terms, about 14% on their loan, which they described as extortion in the court hearings today. that was very different from banks like citigroup or morgan stanley who they said contributed to the crisis, but got a much lower interest rate on their loans. and they questioned why that was the case, also the government took a 79.9% stake in aig as part of the bailout terms. they argue that the government did not do that to the other banks that again, contributed to the crisis, so they are questioning why they are the only ones being punished and the other banks much got much more favorable terms. >> let's look at this. most people would probably think this would be a boring trial to cover. this is probably