judge hannon heard the case and he issued an injunction. he said mr. president, your change in the regulations of the and issued pursuant to the immigration and nationality act. your change in those. before you you are changing t regulations you have to be able to go through a process. you have to have notice and opportunity for people to be heard and objections to be made. and before the regulations can be, and that was basically the decision that he rendered. the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit next to the supreme court upheld the injunction and today decision confirmed that the obama administration while this plan may not proceed. sent but the fight is far from over. the case will not be sent back to judge hannon for additional litigation on the merits and the ultimate outcome remains uncertain. i would say that for it to issue a stay and to block a federal agency for going forward with a rule or regulation, the federal judge in the federal court must find that the opposition on the litigants have a substantial likelihood of pre

that judge hannon would be upheld in his decision. but what is clear, as highlighted by the egregious, unethical conduct of the lawyers of the united states department of justice, where i served for almost 15 years, and we worked our hearts out to always be faithful and operate with integrity before the federal judges. and always, since we were representatives of the united states of america, to make sure that every representation we made to the court was accurate, as a high standard. and most assistant united states attorneys and department of justice lawyers should know that and hear that at the highest levels. other lawyers frequently don't. private attorneys don't but federal attorneys representing the people of the united states of america have that high duty. well, what happened? judge hannon found really that they were determined to go forward with these unlovely actions, even though he had -- with these unlawful actions even though he ordered them to stop and it appears to have caused some substantial violation of integrity of

judge hanning, the fifth circuit, and even the supreme court believes that it is likely that judge hannon would be upheld in his decision. but what is clear as highlighted by the egregious, unethical conduct conduct of the lawyers of the united states department of justice, where i served for almost 15 years and we worked our hearts out to always be faithful and operate withdg integrity before the federal judges, and always sense we work representatives of the united states of america to make sure that every representation we made to the court was accurate.o it was a high standard and most united states attorneys and department of justice attorney lawyer should know that and adhere to that at the highest level. other lawyers are frequently don't, private attorneys frequently don't but federal attorneys representing the people of the united states of america have that high duty. well what happens, judge hannon found really that they were determined to go forward with these unlawful actions, even though he had ordered them to stop. subst it appears in some substantial violation of integrity

our sister network sky news reporting that voter turnout was just shy of 84%, with me now, dan hannonhe is pro-"brexit." that is to say, he also wants the uk to leave the eu. so, dan, given these early results, these early indications, what is your reaction. if true? the. >> they're not results, deirdre. they're based on opinion polls. i would wait to see if we have hard data to work with. deirdre: fair enough. >> one thing we do agree on it is a close result. given the sort of mismatch of resources, it is incredibly close result. whichever side wins the winners need to take in account nearly half the country voted other way. that wilt impose a certain kind of constraint on winning side. deirdre: you have been very vocal in your points of view. what is most important when you thought about this issue, as a leader? what was the clearest element -- >> democracy. deirdre: for you to leave? >> you know i was votes leave i prefer democracy than oligarchy. i prefer to do what you do and every other self-governing nations does, to hire and fire its own lawmakers. i believe in free trade and

that judge hannon would be upheld in his decision. but what is clear, as highlighted by the egregious, unethical conduct of the lawyers of the united states department of justice, where i served for almost 15 years, and we worked our hearts out to always be faithful and operate with integrity before the federal judges. and always, since we were representatives of the united states of america, to make sure that every representation we made to the court was accurate, as a high standard. and most assistant united states attorneys and department of justice lawyers should know that and hear that at the highest levels. other lawyers frequently don't. private attorneys don't but federal attorneys representing the people of the united states of america have that high duty. well, what happened? judge hannon found really that they were determined to go forward with these unlovely actions, even though he had -- with these unlawful actions even though he ordered them to stop and it appears to have caused some substantial violation of integrity of

. >> stephanie hannon, a former google executive is the chief technology officer for the clinton campaignwere heard that eric schmidt, he is funding the groundwork technology company based in brooklyn, lost from the hillary clinton campaign, the biggest technology vendor to the hillary clinton campaign according to sec reports so it's not outside the realm of possibility that there is some sort of coordination between agents from google to support not just the democratic party, facebook was supporting liberal causes, there specifically supporting hillary clinton. heather: we heard william talk about a couple of studies, one of which said they could influence voters like to 40 percent. there was another one done by the institute of behavioral research and they found google specifically my 20 the search engines to favor one candidate or other could shift the voting preference by 20 percent or undecided voters, up to 80 percent in some demographic groups though they could definitely change the outcome. >> let me suggest that someone who does campaigns for a living that it would be their deci

the case case will now be sent back to judge hannon for additional litigation on the merits and the ultimate outcome remains uncertain. but i

so earlier in the show european parliament member daniel hannon was with us talking about the dangersses even whether individuals have been involved in crime or in radical islamism were we're not able to deport them because the european court steps in and says this is violating their rights as a e.u. citizens. i'm someone who is basically pro-immigration and liberal on the subject but if i'm going to win that argument, if i'm going to carry my constituency with me, people can in return we should be in charge roughly who comes in and roughly in what numbers. connell: david asman is here and it is almost, david, like we're having a similar discussion here in the u.s. >> we are indeed. what happens is, it gets out of control. look what happened to germany where they were very generous, open arms, welcome in the syrian immigrants. they have been through hell over there. all true. but they didn't expect to get a million a year. which is what they're getting now. in the u.k. they were expecting 100,000. last year they got 300,000. here we were expecting certain amount but as soon as preside