earlier we spoke to hans blix, head of the international atomic agency what it would mean if the talks fell apart? >> it means there would be no assurances, no commitments given by the iranian side and it will also mean that the liberal wing in iran which i mean this is also an authoritarian regime, is in power at the time. they would weaken i don't think that's anything that we would like to see. apparently we are seeing that iran is helping to suppress the i.s.i.s. in iraq and we don't know whether they would be very helpful in the future. they are also being helpful in the bringing about of assad to accept that he would do away with his chemical weapons. iran can be very helpful but if they are subjected to what i think they would feel is a humiliation then i think i fear i worry very much about what the attitude will be. >> ervanda berhamian is at barouk college if new york city. very good to have you professor. what is your thoughts about extension of these talks? >> the negotiators seem to have taken a vow of silence, they're keeping to that. we don't get many leaks of what's goi

i spoke with hans blix. >> the whole issue you would say is waste handling. there was molden uranium and the plan was to leave it and let it loose radio activity until the moment in the future when you can handle it. >> assuming construction is completed the arch steel structure will be slid into plagues sometime in 2017. it's expected to keep the world safe from chernobyl's deadly waste for at least 100 years. jonah hull, al jazeera london. >>> in the global view segment saudi arabia's capital punishment, to the saudi king stop the beheadings. the editorial suggests there is little to differentiate between beheadings by saudi arabia or by i.s.i.l. and that, quote the money in saudi arabia makes many people forget about its human rights abuses. >> dubai's kalish times the paper writes the vietnam's victory, washington remains trigger happy and the u.s. ignores the lessons of vietnam at its peril. >>> and finally the irish independent takes aim at its own government. the paper criticizes the irish government, giving only a million euros to the nepal relief eff

hans blix is head of the former atomic energy agency, joins us from -- on skype from stockholm. what could that impact have on these negotiations? >> sanctions are a very important part of it but the u.s. sanctions ant the congress are only one part of it. there are sanctions imposed by the united nations security council, not as far reaching in terms of the economy and the european union decided to have also not any import of oil. so if there is a settlement now then i think for the iranians it's very important that the u.n. sanctions in the first play be lifted. because they see that as a sort of stigma as to placing them in a category of pariah in the world. >> dr. blix you know the prime minister of israel says you can't trust iran, so do members of congress and other leaders. how do you trust a country like iran? how do you verify that they're doing what they said they would do if there is an agreement? >> well, they have claimed all along that they have not been working to get a nuclear agreement, to get a nuclear weapon, and it's true that they have had a nuclear program