german propaganda but on the life of german propaganda in the ninety-ninety-first year, when hans dietrich genschere. this is about the expansion of nato, i showed it and you had it many times, and he says yes there. we agreed that there would be no expansion of nato, then he sort of goes back on his words. what happened and how did it all happen. and why is it all it changed when he said it. it was the ninety-first year, and in the ninety-second year, and in the month of april, the so-called doctrine appeared. wulf, after all, everything about which we almost completely forgot, we very rarely talk about it, and so, if we read this doctrine in the ulf, it accurately describes today's requirements. west in relation to russia. nothing has changed there. exactly the same, let's share. let's not allow it. uh, uh, the re-creation of some new powerful regional powers that we will uh to interfere and which may threaten us, we will not allow the development of new types of weapons, regional conflicts, and so on, when this doctrine appeared. wulf, after all, she was in general. this is very ambiguous from t

say propaganda, but probably from german propaganda of the ninety-ninety -first year, when hans dietrich genscheransion of nato, then he sort of goes back on his word . what happened and how did it all happen. and why it all changed was when he said it. it was the ninety- first year, and in the ninety-second year, and in april month, the so-called doctrine appeared. wulf , after all, everything about which we have almost completely forgotten, we very rarely talk about it, and so, if we read this doctrine in volz, it accurately describes today's requirements. west in relation to russia. nothing has changed there. exactly the same. let's share. let's suppose, in uh, the re-creation of some new powerful regional powers that will interfere with us and which may threaten us, let's not allow the development of new types of weapons, regional conflicts and so on and so forth, when this doctrine appeared wolfowitz. it was, in general, very ambiguous and was accepted in the united states, but then it was slightly corrected, but, in principle, the application of this doctrine led to the fact that the genera