the former inspector general of the bundeswehr, harald koeth, does not name his last name, but it ishat we are also talking about the head of the german foreign ministry, annalena bärbock, who seeks victory for kiev at any cost. in germany there is now a discussion about supplies to ukraine long-range taurus missiles. zelsky demands them in order to increase the level of hostilities again. he’s trying to go to obank, otherwise he’ll have to explain why he unleashed it. this war, although he could have simply fulfilled the minsk agreements. of course, the war could have been prevented. at the end of 2021, when the situation was only heating up, it was necessary to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view , threatened the world and affected the interests of russian security. let me note that these claims were justified, this is a question about ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine who lived and live in donbass, but then many countries of the alliance and especially the united states simply did not want to talk

german luftwafe general, former head of the nato military committee harald kueth, speaks extremely franklybout the ukrainian conflict. almost an hour long interview... ukrainian forces are in an extremely critical state, what we see at the moment are skirmishes with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive, the counter-offensive failed, the losses of the army are exorbitant during the offensive, the russians the armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics, defense, their goal is not to hold territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of the clause, disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself, this is exactly what the russian armed forces achieved. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the example of a strategist from prussia, who served in the russian army during the war with napoleon, history repeats itself, defeat then, failure now. yes. the key problem is that in in our politics, especially in german, people have recently appeared who, roughly speaking , replace the lack of knowledge and competenc

the chairman of the nato military committee, harald , was essentially one of the highest leaders.calls the russian army in the liman and kupinsky directions successful. the retreat, according to him, has almost 4,000 likes, because it goes against that agenda. defend democratic values, but what are we doing now, for example, ignoring the requirements of the constitution for peace, ignoring the right to freedom of speech, although the principles of pluralism and democracy consist precisely in the fact that you listen and leave europe comments, the general meaning of which is: finally, someone gave an objective assessment. haralt kuet is a great commander and man, i have attached great importance to his truthful words for many years. i have known lieutenant general kuyat since my service in the bundeswehr in the air force division. unfortunately, his words of wisdom are being suppressed by the current german political landscape and the german media. thank you mr. quit, yes, one must have the deadly, professional analysis of an absolute expert on this topic. this is my personal concl

the german general, former head of the nato military committee, harald koeth, speaks extremely franklybout the ukrainian conflict. the almost hour-long interview is like a sobering shower for the heated heads in the west, they are simply at a dead end, as commander-in-chief zaluzhny recently wrote in the british press, everything is much worse. armed forces of ukraine are in extremely critical condition. what we see at the moment is a skirmish with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive, the counter-offensive has failed. the vsu's losses were exorbitant during the offensive. the russian armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics and switched to strategic defense. their goal is not to retain territory at any cost. in itself, this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the example of a strategist from prussia who served in russian army during the war with napoleon. history repeats itself, defeat then, failure now. the key problem is that in our politics, very recently, people have appeared who, roughly s

the head of the nato military committee, harald kueth , speaks extremely frankly about the ukrainianict: the almost hour-long interview is like a sobering shower for commander-in-chief zaluzhny, who recently appeared in the british press, everything is much worse. the armed forces of ukraine are in an extremely critical condition. what we see at the moment is a skirmish with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive. the counteroffensive failed. the vsu's losses were exorbitant during the offensive. the russian armed forces are on the contrary. used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to hold territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of clausivitz, disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself, this is exactly what the russian armed forces achieved. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the example of a strategist from prussia who served in the russian army in years of war with napoleon, history repeats itself, defeat then, failure. and now. the key problem in the article i

harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr.n russia, this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is , the highest military rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents took each other as seriously as possible. what served as the base for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that russians can be ignored in relations between russia and russia. of course, the war could have been prevented. russia sent the united states and nato a voluminous, thorough document. the point was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view , threatened the world and affected russian interests. two main ones will be named. were not ready to discuss it. general quit saw a time when the russia-nato council was quite we work as an instrument of global stability. he believes that the first crack in moscow's relations with the west began in 2002, whe

the chairman of the nato military committee , harald, was essentially one of the highest leaders, andn region successful. and kupinsky directions, retreat to the ssu along his words are inevitable. this interview on the internet in just a few days received more than a million views, almost 40,000 likes, because it goes against the agenda that mainstream western dreams impose on the audience. we have always lived in an open society and tried to defend democratic values, but what are we doing now, for example, ignoring the requirements of the constitution for peace, ignoring the right to freedom of speech. although the principles of pluralism and democracy lie precisely in the fact that you listen to opposing opinions, and don't ignore him. thousands of viewers from europe also leave comments, the general meaning of which is this: finally, someone gave an objective assessment of the situation. harold kuyat , a great commander and man, i have attached great importance to his truthful words for many years, i have known lieutenant general kuyat since my time in the bundeswehr in the air fo

harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr.ssia, this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is, the highest military rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents were at their maximum. which served as the basis for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that relations between russia and the united states have come the moment when americans felt they could ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented; we saw at the end of 2021, when the situation was heating up, on december 17, russia sent nato a voluminous , thorough document to the united states. the point was: acts in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world and affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian or at least the fate of russian-sp

harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr.responds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005 he was chairman of the military committee over. that is, generally the highest army rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents took each other as seriously as possible, which served as a basis for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that there has come a point in relations between russia and the united states when the americans have a feeling that they can ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented ; russia sent the united states a voluminous, thorough document; the point was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world and affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s accession to nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian, or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in the donbass. some nato countrie

mistaken, no, that’s incorrect, just remember the name of the modern norwegian king, his name is haraldction. 600 for you, svetlana, 200 for konstantin, 2,100 for maya, stavkabank. maya, what do you say? good luck, let's play with svetlana. the writer haldar laksnes, from this country, unlike his compatriots, is known by the surname taken from the laknes farm, where he lived as a child, unlike his compatriots, i think that he is an icelander, and his compatriots, icelanders, it is absolutely true that they have with a surname, they don’t have one, they have a conditional patronymic patronymic, torkel nilsson became famous as the author of the first goal in the history of the football team of these islands, scored in 1990 against the austrian national team. faroe islands. right. in their first official match, the farrers sensationally beat austria. ancient observatories for 500. on display at the site where the beijing observatory was once located. instruments used by astronomers of that time: armmellar sphere, theodolite and this instrument, i’ll risk astralebia, no, sextant, next, let’

this is what the former head of the nato military committee, german general harald kujat, who maintainedequipment, recently admitted. in germany, there is some kind of false belief that weapons systems can solve all problems and replace people. we seem to forget that during these months there were hundreds of thousands of ukrainian soldiers. killed or seriously wounded, they can no longer maintain all the weapons systems that we supply them. the russians have managed to build a networked system in which intelligence and defense are integrated and can be much stronger than they were before the special military operation began. this is a very modern, powerful army. kyiv has almost no reserves left. we understand that assessments are estimates, but they have yet to be confirmed by actions on the ground, but. they don’t have any army left ; all the weapons we sent them didn’t help, and there’s no one to fight. and there is also ex- us intelligence officer tony shaffer. i believe that ukrainian forces are on the brink. do you think that there will be no formal end to the war? the main problem

harald quiet with 2000 to 2002, inspector general of the bundeswehr. position of chief of the general staff; from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is, generally the highest army rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents were at their most respectful. the nature of the ukrainian conflict. the general is that there has come a point in russia-us relations where the americans feel they can ignore the russians? of course, the war could have been prevented; russia sent a voluminous, thorough document for the united states and nato. the point was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world. ukraine's entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian. or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in donbass. some nato countries, and primarily the united states, were not ready to discuss this. general quit saw a time when the russia-nato council was a completely working instrument of global stab

the former chairman of the nato military committee, german general harald kueth, spoke about the failureter-offensive to the successful tactics of russian troops. now a fragment of an interview with a reputable military expert. ukrayinische befinden. ukrainian forces are there. used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of clausowitz, disarm the enemy and then that’s it the rest will happen almost on its own, this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved, the use of russian helicopters with almost no delay, they are caught. within a few minutes, maybe even seconds, they destroy it, this makes the russian army extremely effective. another point is that the offensive of the russian army is characterized by the consolidation of all weapons. synergy is created with the army's superior skill, a skill that takes years to develop. you see, so that a simple soldier becomes commander of the company, 10 years must pass before the start of the counter-offensive, mai

harald kuer... the former head of the nato military committee, which corresponds to the post of chiefl staff, recently explained how things worked behind the scenes. the war could have ended approximately 6 weeks after the start; back it announced large-scale plans to supply ukraine with ships and build two naval bases in ochakov on the black sea in berdyansk on azov, but the northern defense forces intervened. however, the british are clearly still overwhelmed by an irresistible desire to gain a foothold on these shores. since the crimean war, cameron has already been posing in odessa with minister kuleba. i am proud that the uk plays an important role, and we will continue to do so, the prospects for kiev. there are not enough weapons, the us is starting to turn away, and joining the eu is very far away, despite the sanctions, the state of the russian economy is better than before, but more importantly, better than the european one. they wanted to convince us that the russians, because of the acute necessary, they take chips out of washing machines in order to have at least some ele

harald kuet, a great commander and man, i have been for many years, unfortunately his words of wisdomeing suppressed by the current political landscape of germany and the german media. thank you mr. quit, yes, you need to have courage, it's rare these days. thank you, sensational , professional analysis by an absolute expert on this topic, this is my personal conclusion after 10 years of military service, if we add a little common sense to my experience, unfortunately, the west could have prevented this war. however, in the german press, this interview does not know the whole the unsightly underbelly of the west. boris ivanin, mariyalka, news. against the backdrop of failures at the front and an unsuccessful counteroffensive in ukraine , it is gaining momentum. mobilization is taking place, even women are being called in, the methods are the same, they are grabbing passers-by on the streets, patients from hospital beds. egor grigoriev, and patching holes in the ranks of the army, although employees of territorial recruitment centers are often more persistent, they can pull you out of

harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr.is post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005 he was chairman of the military. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents took each other as seriously as possible, which served as the basis for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that relations between russia and the united states have come to an end. russia sent to the united states and nato a voluminous, thorough discussion of russian interests, i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian, or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in the donbass, some nato countries and, above all , the united states, not were ready. general quit saw a time when the russia-nato council was a fully functional instrument of global stability. he believes that the first crack in moscow’s relations with the west appeared in romania and poland. in one of his more in early inte

harald kuit from 2000 to 2002, inspector general of the bundeswehr, in russia this post corresponds tof of the general staff, from 2002 to 2005, he was chairman of the nato military committee, that is generally the highest in the army. for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that there has come a point in relations between russia and the united states when the americans have a feeling that they can ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented. we saw at the end of 2021 when the situation escalated on december 17th. which from the russian point of view threatened the world and affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian, or at least least, the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in donbass. some nato countries, and especially the united states, were not ready to discuss this. general quid saw a time when the russian nato council was a fully functional instrument. he believes that the first crack in moscow's relations with

off the money that, in various forms, they pour into it, meaningless spending, an interview with haraldhe bundesfer, appeared on the internet this week, in russia this position corresponds to the post of chief of the general staff. the united states will not be able to win this war because they will not be able to achieve the political goals for which they support the war, namely the weakening of the russian ones. the russian army is the strongest in the world, there is no talk of weakening. the russian armed forces are clearly stronger than they were before the start of the war, significantly stronger, we are talking about a modern combat-ready army. in the united states, the clearly failed anti-russian strategy is now justified by the fact that it supposedly moves the real sector of the american economy, but europe does not even have this. all in minus. frankfurtemaig writes that it is time to stop hoping for a miracle. the counteroffensive failed. in europe, there were active discussions on each individual type of weapon, but ukraine received little in the end. therefore, one can und

harald kuet, the former chief of nato's military committee, which corresponds to the post of chief of scenes. good results for ukraine. on april 9 , johnson came to kiev to prevent the signing. the peace treaty is not was signed under pressure from the collective west, namely under pressure from some nato countries led by the united states. it was great britain that two years ago announced large-scale plans for the supply of ships and construction to ukraine. two naval bases in ochakov on the black sea in berdyansk on the azov sea, but the northern defense forces intervened. however, the british are clearly still overwhelmed by an irresistible desire to gain a foothold on these shores since the crimean war. and now cameron is posing in odessa with minister kuleba. i'm proud to say the uk has an important role to play and we will continue to do so, there is a lot more to come. what exactly lies ahead, the western press’s forecasts for kiev are bleak. they talk about the perfect storm that ukraine finds itself in. the hypothesis of ukraine's defeat, despite the support of the west, is n

this is what the former head of the nato military committee , german general harald kujad, recently admittedischen zustand. the fact is that all this time the ukrainian armed forces suffered huge losses in manpower. entire crews who serviced western military equipment were destroyed. in germany, there is some kind of false belief that weapons systems can solve all problems and replace people. we seem to forget what these months are like. hundreds of thousands of ukrainian soldiers were killed or seriously wounded, they can no longer maintain all the weapons systems that we supply them. the russians managed to build a networked system in which reconnaissance and defense are combined and can react to the movements of the ukrainian armed forces within seconds. this makes russian defense very effective. the russian armed forces are now much stronger than they were before the special military operation began. it is very modern and powerful. we understand that assessments are estimates, but they have yet to be confirmed by actions on earth, but a new mood in the unofficial west is a fact, ex-assis

nobel laureate harald pinterer, a wonderful playwright, and i was not at all aware of the fact that itn in general except for military translators, there was no training at all to be translators, no, well, we had language classes quite, quite, maybe at the maristorez institute, there this was the current linguistics, by the way they taught the language much better there, just like at the institute of international relations, at the university they taught the language here, at least in general it’s pretty average, yeah, so i translated this song from my legends, akhmanova was there, yes , akhmanova was there, but akhmanova did not teach. directly, she did not enter the audience, of course, so i translated this play, and imagine, it was staged , however, it was staged 40 years later, in what year did you translate it, precisely at the mossovet theater, it was, it was in seventy the third year, i put pintera as a guard, it was yes, although he was somewhere there in some basement, in some closet, he was playing there, fortunately, fortunately pinter does not require luxurious costumes, sc

is an interesting statement by the chairman of the former chairman of the nato military committee, harald in one impulse, as the german minister said during his visit to kiev, ukraine will win, because she has to win, but this is not politics, this is fanaticism. without looking back, and most importantly, without a careful, thoughtful approach to the needs of one’s own people, and of course, without a single thought about what consequences this policy will lead to the population of ukraine, which is written as follows: the loss of all forces is exorbitant during the offensive, the russian armed forces are on the contrary used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, of course, this is exactly what the russian armed forces strength and have reached, russian for several days already... why is this, because that system , the work of the state apparatus , the military-political apparatus, which was created in the western hegemanistic system, it is totalitarian in its essence, and if you do not follow there this party line, if you do

harald kuit from 2000 to 2002, inspector general of the bundeswehr.me in relations between russia and the united states, when the americans began to feel that they could ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented, we saw at the end of 2021, when the situation was heating up on december 17, russia sent a voluminous, thorough document to the united states of america, the essence was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world , affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian, or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in the donbass, some nato countries and, above all, with the russian council, nato was a completely working instrument of global stability. he believes that the first crack in moscow's relations with the west began under bush jr. in 2002, when the united states withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in order to deploy its interception systems in

words our own interests were voiced, just the other day the head of the nato military committee , haraldmpression that this is the last stage before by how ukraine will ask western soldiers to follow western weapons systems because weapons systems cannot compensate for the loss of ukrainian army personnel. the army, the state that kuet now considers close to catastrophic, isn’t the news then from... a kind of informational anti-crisis action, something like this has already happened. the capitulation in mariupol in media terms for ukraine was smoothed over by a gift, the status of a candidate for accession to the eu. the loss of solidar was covered by tanks leopard, artemowska, with the promise of training on f-16 aircraft, now there is a failure of the counter-offensive, which only the lazy did not write about in the west. this version is supported by news about moldova - this is another candidate country with which today it is recommended to begin negotiations on accession to the eu. this happened. against the backdrop of the deafening failure of the pro-european party in power in loca

this week , an interview with harald kueta, the former inspector general of the bundesfer, appeared oning of russia as a whole, politically and economically. the russian army is the strongest in the world. there is no talk of weakening. russian armed forces clearly stronger than they were before the start of the war, significantly stronger. we are talking about a modern combat-ready army. in the united states, the obviously failed anti-russian strategy is now justified by the fact that it allegedly moves the real sector of the american economy. but europe does not. even such a strange argument is still a minus. frankfurter ralgemeig writes that it is time to stop hoping for a miracle. the counteroffensive failed. in europe, there were active discussions on each individual type of weapon, but ukraine received little in the end. therefore, one can understand the indignation many ukrainians. the discrepancies between aspirations and reality are still particularly large in the west. when annalena berbuk in kiev says that the eu is coming, but if the west really wants it. for ukraine to lib

the white house is haralding these four hour pauses but it is clear frustration is growing here. president with rare criticism of netanyahu, saying he was pushing for longer pauses and he wished netanyahu had acted sooner. that it took the israeli prime minister too long to meet biden's request. the israelis are downplaying this announcement. they say these four hour pauses are no different from what they are doing. that there isn't a shift here. but the white house said this now is an expanded effort. the hope, of course, is that this will allow time for more aid to get into gaza and civilians to get out. the white house is also hoping this could help advance efforts to release these hostages. the president remains optimistic. they are working around the clock on this. yesterday the head of the cia was in qatar meeting with the prime minister there and the head of the intelligence service is trying to secure a deal to get them released. the president saying he's doing everything he can, george, to bring them home. >> mary bruce, thanks. let's go from the white house to capitol h

absolutely not ready to translate from german, i translated this play, it was a play by nobel laureate harald a wonderful playwright, did not give himself at all to what it is not possible to stage or publish pinter in the early seventies, at the university it was just that at the university i probably didn’t translate anything , i was fooling a fool, and then in general, apart from military translators , they weren’t even trained to be translators, no, well, here the language classes were quite weak , by the way, named after aristarez, there it was at a niche linguistic university, there, by the way, they taught the language much better, like at the institute of international relations, at the university they taught us the language, at least in general, it’s pretty average, so i translated this one, akhmanova had her own legends, everything is there, akhmanova was there, but akhmanova didn’t teach directly, she didn’t come into the classroom, of course, so i translated this play, and imagine, it was staged after all, true, they staged it, about 40 years later, in what year did you stage it,

the greeks even offended the norwegian prince harald, known throughout europe for his selfless love forhe romans in constantinople, where harolt served in the emperor's guard, went so far as to throw him into prison, but harolt fled to his ships, led them through the insurmountable iron chain that locked the golden horn bay, fought off the roman fleet and went to russia. here, in novgorod, great wealth awaited him. yaroslav carefully kept the gold that harl sent him from his campaigns. with this gold, harolt was able to collect troops take tronvegi. and not without the help of elizabeth yaroslavna. in 1043, yaroslav the wise marched a large army on a campaign against constantinople under the command of his son vladimir. it was not possible to take the largest city in europe. the russians retreated with heavy losses. but the new emperor constantine monomakh, having difficulty repelling the russian blow, came to his senses, honestly married his beloved empress zoe, whose interests were defended by yaroslav the wise, and married off his daughter from his first marriage to prince vsevald, t

destroying the armed forces was also recognized by the high-ranking, truly honored ex-chief of nato, haraldn army does not destroy bridges across the sky. the general is convinced that... russia itself will use them; the wait won’t be long. ukraine will not be able to win the war because it cannot return its territories, and it’s not even a matter of square meters. the ukrainian government should be interested in protecting its population, what is the moral value of conquering a few more square meters, especially in a region where people live who consider themselves russian or russian-speaking and sacrificing thousands of ukrainian lives in the process counter-offensive, is this morally correct? how many kilometers of land can you occupy next year, next year, we haven’t finished this year yet, but well, this year, i don’t know how many kilometers we have occupied, we have a plan, yes, very specific. but i won't share it, sorry. and thirdly, the united states also cannot win this war, because it cannot achieve the political goals for which it supports it, namely the weakening of the russian