i'm not sure if that figure includes the trade paperback or the various hardback editions. that figure that you gave me is what knopf says, and they said it to me, and i didn't really ask what the different editions were. c-span: the first book about lyndon johnson was on what subject, what part of his life? >> guest: well, it starts really before his life, because i wanted to show what life in rural texas was like, and his ancestors, which i thought was such an important part of his life. and it takes him up to the age of 32, when he gets his first national power. and, at the end of that book, he tries for the senate, that's the last scene, in 1941, and loses to this texas campaigner, pass the biscuits, pappy o'daniel, with his hillbilly band. that's the end of the first volume. he has national power, but he can't move up to the senate. and, now the second book focuses on only seven years of his life. it's after that defeat, where he's stuck in the house of representatives, which he really dislikes, and he cannot find a way to advance himself politically, and his whole lif

this is the book in hardback. i prefer the tv version. i've been explaining overly arcane and esoteric investing concepts and financial jargon. i'm trying to bust it, help you become a better investor, make the whole process of managing your money seem less daunting. so what else do you need to know? all right, here is one of the most dreaded and poorly understood terms in the business. ready? the correction. what a euphemism. a correction is when after the market has been roaring, it turns around and gets crushed, maybe a decline as much as 10% is a correction, making you feel like the world is ending, the sky is falling and you never want to own another stock again in your life. and that's precisely the wrong reaction. it may feel horrible, but stocks can and do. could back from corrections. they bounce back from the big declines all the time, especially coming off a major run. think of it like this. when the market goes on a 56-game hitting strict a la joe dimaggio, and joe doesn't get on base the next day, that doesn't mean you'll nev

there is an 8x10 picture in the hardback washington post book, and you can get 'em online. they're running online. but while we were dancing, he said we are going to do this. well, i know, i knew he wasn't talking about dancing. he was talking about the led better bill. he said, we are going to do this. so he, he saw it through, and got it done. but when that pen hit that paper, it meant so much to so many. that was what went through my mind, was all of you that's got family are working out there today that you have that right. and you find out ten years there now you've been discriminated against, you can file that charge in 180 days. so it was an awesome feeling. and then we went in for the reception, and that was the first one they had done since they got there, and that was the first time the women's groups in washington had been to the white house in the eight years. eight years they had not been there. and they had all the refreshments set up, and i looked at all those neat little dainty dishes, and i sure did want some, but be i was busy. and they told my daughter's

various respects i've outlined it may be difficult to convert to rumor history and surmise into hardback. the in court has seen, for example, that the rumors put about by at least one political commentator, that mr. murdoch had some role in mr. gordon brown's decision not to call a snap election in october 2007, are unlikely to be true because the prime minister's decision was made before the former arrived in chequers that weekend. other aspects of the matter may be difficult to prove for this separate reason, the government may well have wanted to pursue policy x. or not to pursue policy why, for reasons associated with the wishes and objectives of media moguls. in relation to the last labour government policy on the euro, we know that the prime minister was more comfortable than was his chancellor of the exchequer, and that the latter set conditions which were unlikely ever to be fulfilled. he would say in the public interest. mr. murdoch's wishes may well have been wholly coincidentally that said, these -- the inquiry will need to address within the constraints of its terms of refere

great to be here, although i must say i hardbacks to follow. so that is a good thing. we are really happy to be here, and i wanted to come on a couple of things, draw out a couple of the conversations that jamie and cecilia started because i think there are some interesting threads here that we can pull on collectively over the course of the day and in the future work that the commission will be doing in this important area of trans-atlantic separate security cooperation. so starting from home i would note that there is actually a fairly large footprint of the hs people here at the conference, and i think that is instructive because its takes me back to an article that dippy secretary and i rode about a year-and-a-half ago. the main thrust of which is that cyberspace is civilian space. so there are many metaphors. all of us who work in this field are always searching for them because we cannot see very far into the future. we are always trying to reason by analogy. they take as part way and produce some bizarre conclusion. you think, well, that is the end of that analo