christensen's commissioner vice president cleaveland commissioner stephen nakajo commissioner michael hardeman chief joanne hayes-white item 2 general public comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction with respect to agenda items, speakers shall address their remarks to the commission as a whole and not to individuals. commissioners are not to enter into a debate or discussion with the speakers, the lack of a response does not constitute an agreement of support for statements during public comment. thank you, madam secretary. >> is there any members of the audience that wants to address the commission at this point seeing none, public comment is closed. item 3 approval of the minutes discussion and possible action to approve the regular meeting of on october 6, 2016, is there any member of the public that wants to comment on the minutes as submitted okay public comment is closed. i'll go to any fellow commissioners beginning about commissioner vice president cleaveland >> move to appr

. >> reporter: front-runners include federal appellate court judges thomas hardeman authored and amendmentt violated by prison officials who strip searched all arrestees, a finding upheld by the supreme court. raymond ordered a list of tear party members who have been targeted. bill pryor who harshly criticized roe v. wade and made it to the bench after initially being filibustered by democrats. diane sykes was appointed by president george w. bush. as the politics of the next speak court pick rage on, most americans admit they have a rather abstract view of the supreme court and cases it hears but many of them start in towns like this one. a friendly community at a local high school facing a very controversial issue. forç now, gavin waits along wi advocates on both sides of the debate to see whom mr. trump nominates and how it would impact landmark cases like this one. >> i have immense confidence in our judicial system and in the ability of justices of whatever background to look at the facts of the case and to understand the principles that animate our civil rights laws and to come to