project debater first faced debate champion harish natarajan back in february in san francisco. debated a machine. and while losing the debate, the audience felt they had learned more about the subject from the ai and from the human champion. i think when you have access to far more information, it changes the way in which you think about the topic. and humans augment that by being able to talk about some of the emotional and moral issues, and i think at least at this stage, artificial intelligence is behind. the future is in a synergistic collaboration between the system and humans, and not in replacing humans. so you never think it will be sophisticated as a human in developing arguments? i believe when you're actually trying to use this technology, you should do that in collaboration with humans. in the end, tonight's ai—assisted debate was a tight—run contest — 51% voted against the motion that al would do more harm than good, with 48% voting for and 1% abstaining. so an ever—so—slightly upbeat view on the future of ai and human interaction in cambridge. and that's it for th

project debater first faced debate champion harish natarajan back in february in san francisco.ence felt they had learned more about the subject from the ai and from the human champion. i think when you have access to far more information, it changes the way in which you think about the topic. and humans augment that by being able to talk about some of the emotional and moral issues, and i think at least at this stage, artificial intelligence is behind. the future is in a synergistical collaboration between the system and humans, and not in replacing humans. so you never think it will be sophisticated as a human in developing arguments? i believe that when you actually trying to use this technology, you should do that in collaboration with humans. in the end, tonight's ai—assisted debate was a tight—run contest — 51% voted against the motion that al would do more harm than good, with 48% voting for and 1% abstaining. so an ever—so—slightly upbeat view on the future of ai and human interaction in cambridge. that wasjen in cambridge and that's it for this week. don't forget that w

project debater first faced debate champion harish natarajan back in february in san francisco.ence felt they had learned more about the subject from the ai and from the human champion. i think when you have access to far more information, it changes the way in which you think about the topic. humans augment that by being able to talk about some of the emotional and moral issues, and i think at least at this stage, artificial intelligence is behind. the future is in a synergistic collaboration between the system and humans, and not in replacing humans. so you never think it will be sophisticated as a human in developing arguments? i believe when you're actually trying to use this technology, you should do that in collaboration with humans. in the end, tonight's ai—assisted debate was a tight—run contest — 51% voted against the motion that al would do more harm than good with 48% voting for and 1% abstaining. so an ever—so—slightly upbeat view on the future of human interaction and ai in cambridge. that wasjen in cambridge and that's it for this week. don't forget that we live on

project debater first faced debate champion harish natarajan back in february in san francisco.s to far more information, it changes the way in which you think about the topic. and humans augment that by being able to talk about some of the emotional and moral issues, and i think, at least at this stage, artificial intelligence is behind. the future is in a synergistic collaboration between the system and humans, and not in replacing humans. so you never think it will be as sophisticated in developing arguments as a human? i believe when you're actually trying to use this technology, you should do that in collaboration with humans. in the end, tonight's ai—assisted debate was a tight—run contest — 51% voted against the motion that al would do more harm than good, with 48% voting for and 1% abstaining. so an ever—so—slightly upbeat view on the future of ai and human interaction here at cambridge. and that's it for this week. the full version is available right now on iplayer and we are on social media, wherever you need us. we're on facebook, youtube, instagram and twitter at @bb

project debater first faced debate champion harish natarajan back in february in san francisco. think it will be as sophisticated in developing arguments as a human? i believe when you're actually trying to use this technology, you should do that in collaboration with humans. in the end, tonight's ai—assisted debate was a tight—run contest — 51% voted against the motion that al would do more harm than good, with 48% voting for and 1% abstaining. so an ever—so—slightly upbeat view on the future of ai and human interaction here at cambridge. and that's it for this week. the full version is available right now on iplayer and we are on social media, wherever you need us. we're on facebook, youtube, instagram and twitter at @bbcclick. thanks for watching and we will see you soon. good morning, welcome to breakfast with rogerjohnson and sally nugent. 0ur headlines today: a pledge not to increase taxes from the conservatives — as boris johnson prepares to launch his party's manifesto. labour promises to compensate millions of women who lost out because of changes to pensions. police of