matthews, and john marshall harlan. in 1970, there was a famous survey of who were the great or near great justices. five of the members of the court ended up as great or near great. can you tell us about the character and makeup, do you know anything about it? >> i have studied it a little bit. if you take a look at riley, harlan, and the others these , were individuals who think very often greatness is wasted upon you. we were in a consequential time where some of the greatest issues of this country were being decided. the civil rights cases, cruikshank and other cases fell established the framework from which we mediated racial relationships for more than 100 years. the 1883 ask have not been overturned. they are still good law in terms of state action. there are a lot of challenges maybe there is some whittling , away at the edges but it is still good law. during that tumultuous time, during reconstruction, many of these cases were being decided. because of the consequences of those cases many of the justices rose t

then you had blacks andwhites in the harlan dissent where harlan says the 13th amendment was not simply just an abolition of slavery, but anaffirmative positive grant of the right not to be discriminatedagainst, along with the 14th amendment, he says. we see a gradual evolution of the constitution as being color blind. that is not nondiscriminatory, but affirmatively giving capacity under the constitution in a color blind fashion. >> the second question? and i'll also add that i think the color blind constitution, i take the caller's point to mean that it is without context, that we've begun to understand this notion of a color blind constitution as divorcing the 13th, 14th and 15th amendment from their originalintent, which was really to make sure that black citizens enjoyed the same benefits of citizenship. and harlan does talk about that in his dissent, as we come to. especially with the privileges and immunities clause of the 14th amendment. he says there's some things that white citizens, when they're born, they enjoy certain rights and privileges. so the ability to go to the theat

justice joseph bradley and john marshall harlan. one wrote the majority opinion and thopinionin a together wrote dissent for the case and they are both very interesting human beings, so what you'd like to tell us about joseph bradley? >> guest: he finds himself at the fulcrum of almost everything that occurred with respect to the enforcement act and the reconstruction. what you see is we talk about the 1883 civil rights cases and prior to the civil rights cases and the cases that bradley wrote that dealt with the act i would argue probably had a greater significance in the context of reconstruction and the potential impact on black americans than the 1875 civil rights act. that is the first act and one of the other things the enforcement mechanism for the 15th amendment. it would have protected the ability or did purport to protect the ability to seek redress when they were denied and voting rights of others such rights. the way that it was worded was particularly at the clan and it was supporting the 14th amendment. bradley wrote t

this is justice marshall harlan. it was albion tourgee who used the colorblind phrase and justice harlan picked it up. can you talk about that? michael: albion tourgee is more emitted to racial equality. all of these justices are likely supportive of white supremacy in some form. harlan was a slave owner, he is an opponent of emancipating slaves in the 13th amendment, he is an opponent of civil rights legislation. he does say racist things in his opinion, he believes that all men have race pride, he believes the white race will continue to exert its supremacy but it is a mistake to use the law to accomplish that for segregation and he says externally racist extremely racist things about chinese-americans as well. it is a mistake to think in 1896 that there are any neo-abolitionists on the supreme court. they think interracial heritage is a bad thing, most of them do not believe african-americans ought to be voting, they do not believe they should be serving on juries, the president of the united states is declaring s

and the one vote dissent was harlan's. justice brown wrote the majority opinion. here's a bit of what he said. in the nature of things, it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality, or a comingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either. what are you hearing there legally? >> well, i smile for a moment when you read that language. that language always sticks out for me in the nature of things. you know, it's loaded. but it also reminds me of another case that most americans don't know about involving women, bradwell versus illinois, the question of whether or not a woman could be a member of the illinois bar, and the court ruled that she couldn't be. but there's also that phrase in that opinion, in the nature of things. so the assumptions about african-americans and plessy and women and bradwell were loaded assumptions that reflected the bias that was the rule, not the exception of the time. but the language in the dissent about color blindness has had such pow

there's race so different from our own house to review john marshall harlan? >> guest: as a, in some ways, a man of his time although in some ways to some degree a little more progressive than many of the white people of his time certainly those on the spring court but there is no doubt as was mentioned a moment ago that this view from his view, with respect to asian-american, chinese americans was flat out racist. already there had been a lot of litigation, significant amount of litigation with respect to chinese americans, asian americans where they stood would they be deemed white for some purposes et cetera so it isn't like they weren't also on the table when it came to constitutional rights but this was a very unfortunate part of this opinion and very racist but again, his views even with respect to african-americans he didn't deem african-americans to be social equals. what he was saying in effect was that it is unseemly and unnecessary for us as white americans to behave this way. there was no spirit that we should have that black people are going to be

harlan, good to see you.re heading to the floor of the new york stock exchange for a look at these markets, oh, let's see, we're actually up right now, 30, nearly eight points. crazy day but we're getting there higher and higher as we move into the final hour and 15 minutes of trading. stay with us. mom, dad, can we talk? sure. what's up, son? i can't be your it guy anymore. what? you guys have xfinity. you can do this. what's a good wifi password, mom? you still have to visit us. i will. no. make that the password: "you_stillóhave_toóvisit_us." that's a good one. seems a bit long, but okay... set a memorable wifi password with xfinity my account. one more way comcast is working to fit into your life, not the other way around. trish: choppy day here. we're up, so i will take it. up 56 doing pretty good here. we've been a little all over the mulberry bush swinging around here as investors try to figure out what exactly the impact of the president's tariff proposal and possible nuclear talks with north korea mi

and justice harlan cannot go along with that. but hugo black, this is vindication for review and that -- or a view that he had in putting forth forever. susan: we will listen to clarence gideon and the attorney for florida talk about reaction to the decision. gideon: i felt great. because i was listening for a decision on the radio when it came on. and most of the prison population heard it. you could hear us from 10 miles as opposed from there. and i also received a telegram congratulating me on the decision. >> phone call from anthony lewis, he was the reporter for the new york times at the supreme court, he was allowed to sit within the bar, anyway he promised me that when the opinion came down, he would call me and tell me what the result was. i was a little bit this up when it that -- i was a little bit disappointed that the decision was unanimous, i was hoping there was at least one justice, justice harlan, a couple other s that we thought might vote on our side. susan: and in fact, the country was waiting for this decision

this harlan, i've been worried about for some time. i don't like the idea that terrorists or bullies are out there connecting on facebook. i'm a big student of history and was a history student in school and you think about how during times of war, wasn't it allies and us, that came together to crack enigma and we had companies at that time that did not, that did not sell to the enemy because why would you? all resources went into the u.s. now you got facebook that's happy to sell to the enemy so to speak. happy to connect enemies with each other, that would take on us because it benefits them. >> absolutely and the problem is much bigger than just facebook. you have places like youtube, that are hyper-focused on cracking down on pro-second amendment videos that are really focused cracking down on conservative thought, banning conservative channels, instead of going after terrorists that are using their platforms. the same is true for twitter. this isn't just isolated to facebook. this is a problem across silicon valley that they make

founder and president of the harlan institute.onstitutional law curriculum for high school students. as we start here, i'm going to ask you to give us just the most basic facts about this case. >> yick wo was decided in 1886. so roughly 18 years after the 14th amendment was ratified. in this case, california enacted a law that required people with laundromats in wooden buildings to apply for a permit. there's no criteria of when a permit is regranted. almost all of the people who applied were chinese, were denied, and all the people who were white got them. this is a criminal offense. and mr. lee yick wo was imprisoned because he failed to pay his fine. this case was appealed to the u.s. supreme court. the supreme court held this was unconstitutional. they found that the standards by which these permits were denied were completely arbitrary, and that it was implemented with, quote, an evil eye and an unequal hand. as a result, it violated the 14th amendment. this was the first major case after the 14th amendment's ratification tha

trish: harlan, you have been thrilled. this is what you're calling for. more competitive, make american workers more competitive, but simultaneously are you running a risk that you're sending consumer prices through the nose because people have it pay more and these companies will have to pay more for the raw materials? >> i can speak to the political side of this. and the president, as you clearly stated, he ran on this. this was a core promise. clear, desist sieve action to reaction to reverse bad trade deals. clear, decisive action. i can say political perspective, i run races from east coast, new jersey, california, we do a lot of polling, and this taking clear, decisive action against bad trade deals is still a really important issue to voters, both democrats and republicans. and so this, may not be very popular on wall street, but on main street, in the heartland of america, and places like ohio where i run a couple different races, this will be enormously popular. trish: the challenges to run the races on, i think about, you know, james, my husband

trish: harlan, john, we'll be back. markets are down 174. you see losses accelerating here.tarting to get nervous. nasdaq is doing quite well. tech hanging on. but the dow losts now looking like they are biggest of the session. we'll have more after this. art. it can be sculpted in beautiful detail. or painted in luxurious strokes. and in rare cases... both. there's nothing more important than your health. so if you're on medicare or will be soon, you may want more than parts a and b here's why. medicare only covers about 80% of your part b medical expenses. the rest is up to you. you might want to consider an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. like any medicare supplement insurance plan, these help pick up some of what medicare doesn't pay. and, these plans let you choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. you could stay with the doctor or specialist you trust... or go with someone new. you're not stuck in a network... because there aren't any. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guid

notice, justice harlan did not -- separately and yick wo. a few years later, justice harlan again dissented, arguing that disclosure very -- exclusionary laws of separate but equal. when he said when we were able to give protections for friedman --he was very much for african-americans, he was not the same about chinese. he is not a friend. the decision was unanimous judgment. it tells you more about the time in which it was argued and the current legacy. the case was argued on may 10, 1980's ask. at that point, the supreme court was meeting in the old capitol building in the room called the old senate chamber. we have a picture of that room now called the ornate room, still available and still in use at the united taste capitol. what was unusual was there was no oral argument. they depended on briefs. why is that? josh: back then, the court heard a lot more cases than it does today. it simply wasn't feasible that every small case argued come of it is parties from california -- it was quite an arduous journey. i'm sure he wanted to get out a

john marshall harlan. and the johnson democrat appointee was samuel blatchford. what should we know about them in general? josh: as a whole, in the civil rights cases, the court was fairly consistent that congress lacks the power to provide mutual protection. that case was one dissenter. john marshall harlan who said that laws discriminating and private businesses discriminating against freed men were instance of slavery. it prohibited this form of racial segregation against african-americans. justice harlan did not dissent -- he did not write anything separately against yick wo. if years later in plessis versus ferguson, justice harlan again dissented, arguing that exclusionary laws of separate but equal are unconstitutional. but he said while we were able to give protections for friedman, chinese people are very different. he was very much equality for african-americans and did not feel quite the same way about chinese people. he was not much of a friend for racial equality from people for china. the decision was unanimous judgment. susan: for some of you just

justice john marshall harlan, this is a kentucky former slave state. he has a note nothing turned abolitionist. he said i would rather be right then consistent. he is writing the consenting decision. pen that chiefhe justice tommy had used to write the dred scott decision. this is one of the great defenders of the promise of the reconstructed amendments. consent, he says that everyone knows that the real purpose of separation was not for the convenience of both parties but to degrade and stigmatize african-americans. he said in respect of civil rights, the constitution knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. the constitution is colorblind. to hiss an odd preface decision, which is jarring. he says "the white race is preeminent and will continue to be. in respect to civil rights there is -- the constitution is colorblind." he was continuing this distinction that other reconstruction people at the time maintained between civil and social rights. you have to give civil rights to everyone, we're not mandating social equality. nowadays that is uncomfort

justice john marshall harlan cast the lone vote in opposition. his dissent eventually eclipsed the legacy of the majority opinion. walker,danielle holli the --attorney from watch at 9:00 eastern on c-span.org and listen with the free c-span radio app. and for background on each case while you watch, order your copy of the landmark cases companion book available for 895 plus shipping and handling. and for an additional resource, there is a link on our website to the national constitution defenders. >> c-span where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-span was created at as a public service by america's cable television companies. and we continue to bring you unfiltered coverage of congress. the white house, the supreme court, and public policy events in washington, d.c., and around the country. him he looked at russia's use of cyber warfare and disinformation as a strategy to attack western democracies. following his comments, a panel of analysts will discuss the strategies and how western governments can respond. this is an hour and a half. good mor

justice john marshall harlan, known as the great descenter, cast the election that eclipsed the majority opinion. explore this with danielle howard alker, dean of university's law school. watch "landmark cases" on c-span, c-span.org or listen with the free c-span radio app. for background on each case, order your copy of the "landmark cases" companion book available for $8.95 plus ipping and handling at c-span.org/landmarkcases. >> this week on newsmakers, the chair of the democratic national committee tom perez. james with "the washington post" and the washington bureau hief for "usa today," susan. susan: there is a great group of senators talking about gun control and the president embraced democratic backed proposals when it comes to gun control. should they make a deal with the president or do you have doubts about whether you can trust and follow through on some of the things that he said at that meeting? toim this is like -- the messenger: this is like charlie brown. tom: this is like charlie brown. senator durbin and others appeared to say i want to help the dreamers. we see this

john marshall harlan and the johnston democrat was samuel blatchford. what should we know?> guest: as a whole of the civil rights cases, the court was fairly consistent that andres black power had one dissenter done more to harlan who said that boz discriminated and private businesses discriminate against -- were in slavery. they have resegregation against african-americans. justice harlan did not descend -- did not write anything separately. a few years later in plessy v. ferguson, justice harlan again argued that exclusionary laws separate but equal is unconstitutional. a very famous part of the opinion he said all were able to give protections for the freemen, there's a different race, that is chinese people. harlingen was progressive with african-americans, didn't feel quite the same way about chinese people. there wasn't much of a friend, yet this decision was a unanimous favor. >> for some of you just learning about these cases, we have a companion book available. it is $8.95 95 senses 95 cents as our costa will get you quickly if you're interested. the website landma

justice john marshall harlan, known as the great dissenter, cast the loan vote -- lone vote in opposition and his dissent eclipsed the legacy of the majority opinion. explore this case with danielle holly walker, dean of howard university's law school, and peter corsenel. watch live tonight at 9:00 eastern on c span, c-span.org or listen with the free c-span radio app. for background on each case while you watch, order your copy of the land mark cases companion book, available for $8.95 plus shipping and handling at c-span.org/landmarkcases. and there's a link on our website to national constitutional centers interactive constitution. >> this week on "q&a" politico manage seen contributing editor joshua zeit, he discusses his book "building the great society: inside lyndon johnson's white house." >> joshua zeitz, your new book "building the great society: inside

john marshall harlan, known as the great dissenter cast the lone vote in opposition and eclipse the legacyf majority opinion. explore this case and the height is real and with daniel holly walker. watch landmark cases live on monday at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span.org, or listen with the free c-span radio app. for background on each case as you watch order your copy of the , landmark cases companion book. it is available for $8.95. there is a link on our website to the national constitution center's interactive constitution. wednesday morning, we are live in phoenix, arizona, for the 50 capitals to her. michelle reagan will be our guest on the bus starting at 9:30 a.m. eastern. now, a discussion on conservatives and president trump from today's washington journal. this is about 45 minutes. studioing us here in our is moda. -- mona sharon. in baltimoree dais outside of washington, d.c., national harbor, maryland. guest: i felt it was necessary to say a few simple truth about the things they republican party has done, and some of the decisions that

thank you to harlan. [applause] we are going to reach our goal of 50% renewable energy and will reach the goal of 100% by 2030 right here in san francisco. and everyone needs to take note, that over the last few years, we have reduced our greenhouse gas emissions by 28%. and at the same time, our economy grew by 78% and our population increased by 19%. we can do this all together. we have erased the myth that a strong economy and a clean environment cannot go together. we in san francisco are proving everybody wrong and we want the entire nation to follow our lead. so today, let us send a message to scott pruitt and to the ep and the trump administration, we will continue in san francisco to fight against any proposal that threatens american families, that threatens our children, and that threatens our environment. san francisco stands as eddie mentioned with more than 240 mayors across the united states. representing 48 different states and territories. and over 52 million americans who are calling on th

stuart: harlan hill, you're all right. thank you, sir.nd headquarters. you know that. jeff flock will show us where they might build, might build in chicago. i believe that. we'll be back. ♪ [fbi agent] you're a brave man, mr. stevens. your testimony will save lives. mr. stevens? this is your new name. this is your new house. and a perfectly inconspicuous suv. you must become invisible. [hero] i'll take my chances. sure. momwhat's up, son?alk? i can't be your it guy anymore. what? you guys have xfinity. you can do this. what's a good wifi password, mom? you still have to visit us. i will. no. make that the password: "you_stillóhave_toóvisit_us." that's a good one. seems a bit long, but okay... set a memorable wifi password with xfinity my account. one more way comcast is working to fit into your life, not the other way around. retail. under pressure like never before. and it's connected technology that's moving companies forward fast. e-commerce. real time inventory. virtual changing rooms. that's why retailers rely on comcast business to

for reggie miller, dan bonner and evan washburn, kevin harlan saying good night from las vegas. this has been a presentation of cbs sports. zone, moving in together and getting two of everything thing. those fur babies preparing you for real babies thing. that one for me, one for you, us together for the rest of forever thing. buy one iphone 8, get one iphone 8 on us. more for your thing. that's our thing. the energy conscious whopeople among usle? say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear. who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your thing. (man) racing has taken me all over the world. (man) but when i put on the helmet... (man) i am still in india. (man) india...where i found yoga... (man) and the champion inside me. (yoga teacher) if your mind is racing... (yoga teacher) how can you... (yoga teacher) slowdown? (yoga teacher) bre

today, justice harlan in the plessy case said our constitution is colorblind. lot of people want because situation to consider color for affirmative action but there is a distinct legacy here. something that is contested today. asan: we're going to have 14th amendment case, particularly emphasizing the provision that says -- nor shall any state the privately person of life, liberty, or property without the process of law or deny to any person in its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. what was the importance of the yick wo case to american society over time? mae: that they cannot discriminate against immigrants. the two main rights that citizens have that immigrants do not have our the right to be territorially present. you cannot be thrown out of the country. and, the right to vote. all people in this country of the same rights, that is important because we are diverse country. jim regret population. not as big as people think. it is about 13% of our -- we have a big immigrant population. not as big as people think. it is about 13 percent. josh: yic

i will defer to my colleague on the turkey eu question, but to harlan's point, i think harlan, there was a chance before they seriously misplayed his hand last fall with the referendum to play that card maybe, but i think unfortunately that has made it almost impossible to do that. at this point we just have to modulate the conflict that's going on between baghdad and other regions. it was worth thinking about at one time but i think the time for that may have passed by a little bit. i'm not quite sure how that cuts. it was our support going back to 1946 where they were averting to when they talked about the long arc of the u.s. tricky relationship and i'm just not sure how much mileage there is because at this point turkey relations. >> to follow up on the syria issue, you arguably the u.s. is arming of the white pg is the krg, et cetera. perhaps the biggest sticking point or roadblock or obstacle in the relationship. in terms of the mistakes, i think one is mixed messaging. coming from different members saying they're not going to stop arming or they are, do you think they underest

justice john marshall harlan, the great dissenter cast the lone vote in opposition in his dissent eventually eclipsed the legacy of the majority opinion. explore this case with danielle holli walker, dean of howard university's law school. an attorney and member of the u.s. commission on civil rights. watch landmark cases live monday at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span.org, or listen with the free c-span radio app. for background of each case will you watch, order your copy of the landmark cases companion book. is available for $8.95 plus shipping and handling at c-span.org/landmarkcases. for additional resources there is a link to the national constitution center's interactive announcer: a look at the house race in pennsylvania congressional district between e andlican rick saccon democrat mr. lamb. courtesy of wtae in pittsburgh, this is just under one hour. a local race on the national stage. >> drawn national attention. announcer: a special election for the

justice john marshall harlan cast the lone vote in opposition and it eventually eclipsed the legacy of majority opinion. el.er cersona watch landmark cases monday at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span.org, or listen with her free c-span radio app. for background on each case, or your copy of the landmark cases companion book available for $8.95 plus shipping and handling at c-span.org/landmarkcases. there is a link on a website for the national constitution center's interactive constitution.

granted all people access to public accommodations like trains and race,rs regardless of john marshall harlan known as the great dissenter cast the lone vote in opposition and equips the legacy of majority opinion, explore this case and the height is real and with daniel holly walker. watch landmark cases live on monday with -- and 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span.org or listen with the free c-span radio app. order your copy of the landmark cases, it is available for a call 95. 8.95. >> does palin prime minister malcolm turnbull and there is of his cabinet answer questions during the most recent setting of parliament in february. topics include protecting children's access to the internet and combating government corruption.

justice marshall harlan cast alone vote in opposition. explore this case and the high courts ruling with the dean of harvard's university law school and a member of the u.s. commission on civil rights. watch landmark cases live monday at 9:00 p.m. eastern or listen c-span radio app. for background, order your copy of landmark cases companion book for $8.95 plus shipping and handling. additional >> in his annual state of the nation address, russian president vladimir putin unveiled russia's latest technological advancements and new weapons systems. this comes a few weeks before russia's presidential election, where mr. putin is expected to win the election. few hours. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2016] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] [speaking russian]

justice john or marshall harlan cast the lone vote in opposition, and his dissent eclipsed the legacy of the majority opinion. explore this case with danielle holly walker, dean of harvard university's law school, and an attorney and member of the u.s. commission on civil rights. watch landmark cases live tonight at nine eastern on c-span, c-span.org or listen with the free c-span radio app. and for background on each case while you watch, order your copy of the landmark cases companion book, it's available for $8.95 plus shipping and handling at c-span.org/landmarkcases. and for an additional resource, there's a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution. >> c-span, where history unfolds daily. in 1979, c-span was created as a public service by america's cable television companies and today we continue to bring you unfiltered coverage of congress, the white

john marshall harlan ii, roosevelt appointee, democrat, hugo black, and william o. douglas.ruman appointee, tom clark, and wizzer white on the court, arthur goldberg, and he left in 1965 to be u.s. ambassador to the united nations. is there anything else about the make-up of that court we should know about? it was a unanimous decision, we'll remember. >> well, there's a lot we could say about the makeup of this court. one of the things that struck me is that compared to the current court, it's a relatively young court. the average age on the court of the nine members is a little under 60 years. you have new members coming onto the court as justice goldberg indicated in his video earlier, this the, you know, one of the first cases he's considering coming onto the court replacing justice frankfurter, who was a big believer in federalism and judicial restraint, and may or may not have been a vote for clarence gideon. the other justice i would just highlight is the second justice harlan, i think, was one of the real proponents on this particular court of federalism and giving mo

noelle nikpor and harlan hill. let's talk about this.ppened i want to know what that serious thing is. if it means the president has to be impeached and removed from office we need to know what that is. but not every single thing is impeachment worthy. >> how many times are the "times" and the democrats going to cry wolf. we have been on this for 15 months. all we have seen up until this point in the case of manafort, some tax evasion. but that's not collusion with russia. let's stop dragging this out. voters deserve to know where we stand. and we need appropriate safeguard in place to make sure if there out. there was a meeting about a possible back channel own lawyep quiet. don't pretend this investigation isn't happening. when mueller's team comes to you, say yes, i'm happy to help, i am sure everything is fine here. that's the best way to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. so that is the issue here. it shows trump doesn't take the advice of the people who are trying to look out for him and his presidency. kennedy: that's not a

. >> i appreciate your comment, harlan. i understand what massoud does, and jtop. our success rate, this success rates are really connected to making sure that the candidates are clear fair and fair from day one wiabout the promises tt are being made. the problem that we've had historically, are promises get made, and they don't get kept. i want to make sure that somebody is holding everybody accountable kpor executi accountable for execution, and i want to be a part of that conversation. i think everybody wants to be a part of that conversation. then, will we only be successful in saying that we kept all our promises. >> yes, sir. agree 100%. [applause]. >> thank you. i think -- anymore questions for me? >> no, david. thank you very much. >> thank you, commissioner kwon. appreciate it. >> commissioner kwon: okay. do you have more? you're welcome. okay. all right. do i have a motion? >> i'd like to move the item. >> second? any discussion? >> public. >> yeah -- no. to public comment, i want to call up steve good and lavon king from the southeast community facility,

justice john marshall harlan known as the lone dissenter. eclipsed the legacy of the majority decision. explore this case with danielle holly-walker. and attorney and a member of the u.s. commission on civil rights. watch "landmark cases" live monday at 9:00 eastern, on c-span, c-span.org or listen with the free c-span radio app. for background on each case while you watch, order your cop of the companion book, available for $8.95 plus shipping and handling at c-span.org/landmarkcases. a link on our website to the national constitution center's interactive constitution. >>> more now from the national governor's association winter meeting. we're switching topics to food and agriculture policy. the issues including expanding u.s. trade, land grants for research and encouraging more young people to enter agriculture industry. the forum is led by wyoming governor matt meade. >> good afternoon, everybody. thank you so much for being here. we've got some more governors coming. my name is matt meade. i'm the governing of wyoming. i'm pleased to hav