joining me is harmeet dhillon center for american liberty, harmeet it strikes me that so many are claiminge journalistic set to be upset about the, you know, unfair and hideous imprisonment of the wall street journal reporter, as we all should be, but they stand by and let this happen with the harassment of journalists and others expressing their opinions by our own government. >> absolutely, laura. this type of thuggish intimidation we're seeing from representative plaskett from the virgin islands is outrages but also a piece of the actions of the department of justice against journalists for some years now. i mean, you see how the doj's going after project veritas for not publishing the ashley biden diary now you see some of the most important journalism work in decades being the subject of these types of thuggish threats. and so when you see this level of hysteria from aoc and congressman plaskett you realize the journalists are over the target so it's actually a compliment to them because our government wouldn't be shrieking this way if it wasn't for the fact the journalists exposed go

victor harmeet, thank you so much. tonight, thank you. >> thank you. chilling new details on another story tonight. about what nashville shooter audrey hale wrote in her journal and how long the trans killer planned the attack. fox news chief correspondent jonathan hunt is live in our west coast newsroom. with all the details jonathan . >> good evening, pete. and there is a lot of new detail. one hundred and fifty two rounds, for instance, were fired by the shooter. that was months of planning that went into the attack and there has been no motive found yet. those are the key takeaways from the latest police information on the covenant school shooting released as hundreds of nashville school children protested at the tennessee capitol , calling for more effective action on gun control. that chance, including thoughts and prayers, are not enough. there are signs reading book bags, not body bags and second graders over second amendment. police and the fbi, meantime, continue to review those writings left behind by the twenty eight year old shooter, audre

harmeet , thank you. and in a stunning admission yesterday, the bush wouldnstration would not commit to any age limitation'tor for transgender surgeries orposn blocher's does the presidente have a position on what age these kinds of therapy and surgeries are appropriate? that's something forans to dec d and their parents to decide is not something we believ be should be decided by by legislators. sions now. okay, so children should make medical decisions. and if that wasn't disturbing enough, here she was today. when land when listening to thi just remember, it's only been 10 days since a trans killer shot up a school, a christian school, killing six and i three children, among them inn nashville. nashville.lgbtq i plus kids are resilient. they are fierce.k. they fight're back . they're not going anywhere . they fight baceir back. >> she had to read those words . they fight back . if i didn't know any better, i'd say the white house is giving tacit approval to actions that may end up in bad, bad places fo

harmeet your reaction to some of this information coming out, gag orders, mug shots, 34 felony counts. also stepping back and victor i'll ask you about this as well, the spectacle that was today, a president of the united states submitting to an indictment and what will happen tomorrow. >> well, this is unprecedented, of course. when you look at all the aspects that are unprecedented, i i actually disagree with sol about whether the former president can get a fair trial because remember how this district attorney actually came to office. almost unprecedentedd in american history. he actually campaigned on the idea that if elected he would make it his top priority to concoct some kind of a case against the former president. that is a very rumbling crossing of a line that i think you're going to do repeated all over the country now in retaliation for this clearly politicized prosecution. the latest that i'm hearing from the folks who have been in the mix there in new york today include there may not be a gag order, we talk about new york law, it actually looks at also whether a gag orde

all right, harmeet , great to see you tonight. as always.hank you.harris that l was kamala harris harrise lying about her love of space and "ingraham angle" investigation in moments david koresh had been preparing his followers for just such a bad. we anticipate safely executing a search warrant and seizing machine guns. atf didn't anticipate even one shot being fired. the branch davidian, we're expecting it was going to be all out war. the shockwave and fallout from this deadly confrontation can still be felt today. scandalous waco screaming now gy on fox nation. whathons, hey, i just got a tem my sister. you remember rick , our neighbor? -just he's the 76 year old guy who still runs marathons, right? >> sadly, not anymore. >> wow.e we? >> wow.e we? so sudden we're not about to have the we need life y insurance conversation. >>5 a montan again, are we? no. we're having though we areng eno getting coverage so we don'tug9, (j >> conversation. so you're calling abouonmet fory the nine ninety five month plan from colonial pan am. we put it ofco

with more here is harmeet dhillon his firm as part of the legal team representing donald trump in this case, i would just like you to react, first of all to the latest news we have seen on this which is the idea that the judge may impose a gag order on donald trump perhaps prompted by his team announcing the display need to make a public statement at a 15:00 p.m. on tuesday they want to gag him from speaking about this. >> first of all i saw the gag order issue coming last week it is not uncommon in new york and is not uncommon for prosecutors in the country to request this. we start with the premise that under the first amendment any prior strain on speech included by litigants and lawyers and by defendant has disfavored in the law. it is supposed to be a big hurdle to get over to get that. as a practical matter in new york state, judges do and post the gag orders in the have to look at is it likely the speech that the court is seeking to enjoin is going to affect the defendant's right to a fair trial that is the important point, normally speaking a gag order the six the moment right

harmeet, thank you. >> the biden administration wouldn't commit to any age limitation for transgendergeries or blockers yesterday. >> does the president have a position on at what age these kinds of therapies and surgeries are appropriate? >> that's something for a child and their parents to decide. it's not something that we believe should be decided by legislators. >> laura: ok, so children should make the medical decisions now. and if that wasn't disturbing enough, here she was today. when listening to this, just remember it's only been 10 days since a trans killer shot up a school, a christian school killing six and three children among them in nashville. >> lgbtqia+ kids are resilient. they are fierce. they fight back. they're not going anywhere. and we have their back. >> laura: she had to read those words. they fight back. if i didn't know any better, i would say the white house is giving approval to actions that may end up in bad, bad places for people. now, with each and every disturbing remark, the white house -- and by extension the whole of the democratic party -- they mov

trump attorney harmeet dhillon also shared a copy of the order on social media.or trump in the legal system. this a setback this unrelated to everything going on in manhattan today. a federal appeals court has denied his request to block his ex aides from testifying to a grand jury. that panel is investigating efforts by the former president and his allies to overturn the 2020 election and the january 6th capitol attack. now some of the former president's closest allies will be compelled to testify, including former white house chief of staff mark meadows, a bill going through the california legislature is trying to criminalize. >> homelessness set. the mayor of san jose is pushing back against it. senate bill 31 was introduced by senator brian jones of san diego and would ban people from sitting on a sidewalk within 1000 feet of areas like schools and daycares parks and libraries. san jose currently prohibits people from camping in some of those areas, but only within 150 feet. san jose mayor matt mahan says he does not support criminalizing encampments, their s

harmeet dhillon is obviously a famous civil rights attorney . she's highly familiar with this case. and we have to ask, why did a judge allow cameras into the court to take pictures of trump? normally you see sketches that seemed like part of a strategy, a political strategy, not a legal one . >> army film. thank you for coming on . what did you make of that? well, i agree with you, tucker. i mean, if the democratic party is using this prosecution, which i believe they are to influence the outcome of the next election, this photograph is going to be a prop in those campaign ads. and it all seems to be really well targeted towards that. i would even say that the judge not putting a gag order on both sides in this case is the same because by by by scolding the defendant and saying you better stay away from an imaginary line that i'm not going to draw for you. he's effectively chilling his speech while at the same time not putting any constraints whatsoever on the district attorney who could go out. and in fact, completely ignore his his his oath to do justice and prejudge that the def

. >> the entire point, harmeet dhillon has followed all of this closely. from the inside. she's the founder ofan l the dillane law group. thanks so much for gr coming on tonight. so let's start with a specificlr question. germane to the race in which donald trump is engaged. he's the front runner by 30 points in. you have seen cases, politicized cases, as with roger stone, in which the person charged is gagged by the judge and not allowed to speak about the charges. a this is increasingly in violation of the first amendment, obviously, but itam endmhappens if this happensspeeh to donald trump, he will lose a his free speech rights as adenta and i'ate in a presidential race.m just wondering if you think that and i'm just wondering if you think that could potentially couhappen? very much coul >> well, it very much could. happen. we you've seen it talked about on television already. and in fact, the president hasto been subject to similar former presidents, subject to similar allegations in other litigationa that he's involved in. beyond the also, way beyond the statute of be