i know harold hamm did need to raise some money. to me, that's another toll road. but i'm sure there are people that say listen taking on some commodity risk for some of these deals. >> well, you're not taking very much commodity risk, per se, but you are taking volume risk on some of these plays. so indirectly if you have a draconian drop in the amount of production in a particular basin in the long run, you would suffer less throughput. now, what attracted us to this particular asset was, number one, we were not in the bakken this gives us a tremendous platform not only to serve the present customers but to deal with a lot of other producers up there where we have great relationships in other producing areas. we think we can expand the footprint dramatically over the next 3 to 5 years. secondly, the hh pipeline is starting up the double-h pipeline. that's one of the most economic ways to get crude out of the bakken. we're just starting it now, and i'm happy to say that based on our nominations, we're going to be basically full the first month. we plan to expand t