harold says lance is getting a raw deal. where is the evidence? it's a shame that in this country, a person can be tried and convicted in the press and on the hears of convicted people. i would like to see the direct evidence that in fact, lance took performance enhancing drugs. shame on nike for dropping lance without such proof. they have just fed into the frenzy. harold, i think there are two central questions at work. the first, did lance armstrong use performance enhancing drugs? i'm thinking the evidence he did is a lot more overwelming than apparently you believe it is. but the number two question is, is the process of prosecuting the case against him fair? and there, well there i think there's room to argue. maybe you can do it right here in mcginty's mail bag. the address is mailbag@wusa9.com. please don't forget to include your name and where you are writing us from. that is our report. i'll be back at 11:00 along with anita brikman. don't forget, log on any time you like to wusa9.com. we'll see you a bit later. >>> "entertainment tonigh