australia ok but i will move on public union just to the supreme court heard oral arguments in harris quint and basically you know this is supposed to be this are the supreme court case was supposed to be about whether or not these home health care workers people who go into people's homes and work who are represented by a union and paid by the state whether they are state employees because they're paid by the state or whether they're independent contractors because they get to determine the times and places of their work and hours of their work but that's really not what got argued before the supreme court as you both know what really got argued before the supreme court was whether a public employees employees people who are being paid by the government should have the right to unionize and that's what the court is going to rule on just like with citizens united you know it was supposed to be about it about mccain feingold and it turned out to be about something all to give it was about compulsory unionization of public workers in a very specific instance in cases where in this state you'r