i want you to google, harry hopkins, harry hopkins was a confident and best friend of franklin rooseveltu liberal democrats out there, the media, you let the fbi. everything he did come in sick the irs on the opponent's sick irs on the media. grounded up with the americans, kept offshore, you love your fdr. would you impeach him by the way? of course not, you would celebrate him. with that said, harry hopkins and every president has had one of this. harry hopkins lived in the white house. harry hopkins conducted for the president and he went around the state department come infuriated the secretary of state, secretary of treasurer, secretary of commerce and conduct foreign policy. talk to stalin, churchill and he would do all these other things. so i have a suggestion for adam schiff. why don't we retroactively, cautiously befriend franklin roosevelt? that would be justice, ladies and gentlemen. yes, that is it. >> sean: and then i released the oh, joe biden/ukraine transcripts. let's see, the flexibility of the tape so the vladimir putin transcripts. the obama/iran transcripts come a lo

harry hopkins lived in the white house.enho harry hopkins conducted foreign for the president and het around the state department, infuriated the secretary of state, secretary of treasurer, secretary of commerce and conduct foreign policy. talk to stalin, churchill, and he would do all these other things. so i have a suggestion for adam schiff. why don't we retroactively, posthumously impeach franklin roosevelt? that would be justice, ladies and gentlemen. yes, that is it. >> sean: and then i released the, oh, joe biden/ukraine transcripts.en let's see, the flexibility of the tape so the vladimir putin transcripts. the obama/mullahs in iran transcripts, a lot of transcripts to read. great one, great job. new timeslot, every sunday night, new slot at 8:00 p.m. eastern. when we come back, actually they had therapy dogs on capitol hill to help people cope with the stress of impeachment progress. donald trump jr. is here. he will weigh in on the crazy people showing up on his book tour. lawrence jones on the streets of washington today speaking with people outside of the capital and rush

either that, and harry hopkins who in, july, for example went to moscow to get an idea whether or not the russians who would in fact insist and his input that they appeared to be doing that, of course, helped cause our policy and supporting to do so and go into place. third, the whistle-blower talking about the whistle-blower giving a name and that sort of thing supposedly illegal and that was not my understanding of the statute. it is a case of trying to protect a so-called whistle-blower, and again, i think some of the criticisms of the abuse of that term in this context seem to be valid and it is a case of trying to protect him or her against reprisals and that can certainly be done and yet we need to know who that might be. otherwise, it is interesting that in accepting the position that one cannot mention the whistle-blower or talk to him, cross examine him opens the possibility that any kind of anonymous because it would be, anonymous charge that could lead to impeachment has to be accepted at face value without any kind of a chance to check whether or not the person who offered

very distant perch here about the the different channels back channels irregular channels well harry hopkins was one hell of a great intermediary for franklin delano roosevelt during the 2nd world war there were other cut outs to j.f. kennedy use during the cuban missile crisis henry kissinger while he was national security council adviser he kept everybody in the dark about nixon china policy i could go on and on and on ok it's the president's foreign policy he can ask anyone he wants to be to be his be his representative. correction go ahead go ahead absolutely. or. residence or we don't like. we so or. didn't that's american for a while i think i know how to day but i think i think we're quibbling here we're quibbling right here i get i want to say i don't want no then foreign policy will always be an we within the realm of bureaucrats then why do we need elections why do we elect a president then if the bureaucracy is going to determine policy now i disagree with you on that go ahead christopher go ahead jump and look at the end of the day foreign policy isn't set by trump when trump is

he had harry hopkins who lived in the white house, negotiated for stalin and churchill and others, infuriated the bureaucracy at the state department. since the president sets foreign policy for the executive branch, don't we have this reversed? isn't the state department that's doing the irregular things when they defy a president's policy. >> not only that, you have so many problems in ukraine. the democrats hate to admit this, but their sources for the fusion gps company they were paying to dig up the dirt on trump that made its way into the fbi, there were ukrainian sources there. they were paying people to go into ukraine and dig up dirt. some of the start came from high-ranking ukrainian officials, allegedly. but what we do know is there was another operator out there that was working with ukrainians and the ukrainian ambassador in washington d.c. publicly trashed the trump campaign which is almost unheard of for an investor, a sitting ambassador to side with one party over another in washington d.c. now look, none of the ambassador corps just like known in the media thought president t

i see the back channel the state department hated since harry hopkins went to england for fdr and scullyved in the cuban missile crisis. the state department hates back channels. when they blow up like iran, they blow up badly but there is nothing illegal. we're on the verge of the first partisan impeachmenimpeachment. >> impeachment in '98 was a partisan affair. >> bipartisan in the vote. >> amosh voted for it, too. >> make it about as bipartisan as the others. >> republicans have had at least 14 ways to defend this president and the president wants fierce loyalty. the president wants a republican party talking about him in a positive light who are making the arguments that frankly you're making, which is that the president did nothing wrong or the president might have done something a little problematic but this is how foreign policy works. we have to give them something to be able to get something. i will say democrats are very -- they are very focused on how to tell this story this week and i'm told from democratic aids they wanted taylor to be there because he's a vietnam vet and wa

i see a back channel that the state department has hated since harry hopkins went to for fdr, since kissinger. the state department hates back channels. when they blow up, they blow up badly, but there's nothing illegal. it's policy dispute. we're on the verge of the first partisan impeachment since 1868 wrrbs and i don't think the american people like this at all. purely partisan vote in the house. that's what we're going to have. >> i think impeachment in '98 was a partisan affair. >> it was bipartisan vote. >> justin amash voted for it, too. >> not a republican anymore. >> it would make it about as bipartisan as the other one. yamiche. >> republicans have had at least 14 ways to defend this president, and the president really wants fierce loyalty. my sources at the white house basically say that the president wants a republican party that is talking about him in a positive light, who are making the arguments that frankly you're making, hugh is making, which is the president did nothing wrong. or the president might have done something that was a little problematic, but this is how foreign