harry littman, christopher o'leary thank you all for joining us this hour. please do stay with us as we track the investigation into the attempted assassination of former president, donald trump. we are back after a quick break. hi, i'm jason. i've lost 228 pounds on golo. ♪ changing your habits is the only way that gets you to lose the weight. and golo is the plan that's going to help you do that. just take the first step, go to golo.com.

. >> joining me now, harry littman, former u.s. attorney, former deputy assistant attorney general. the talking feds podcast. could to see you, harry. aoc admits politically the odds are against this, but legally is this an opinion congress should consider busting mark >> it's actually in reverse. i think what she admits is it's not going to really fly politically and legally we have had one justice impeached in the entire history of the country. very few have even gotten to this point, one actually president ford moved to impeach a justice but what she has gone off on is a failure to recuse. as we know, that's something that they arrogate to themselves, one of the many things, so the standard to call it a high crime and misdemeanor is really a very tough showing because they just apply their own rules. i think it's more about upping the ante, keeping the focus on them in general. this is a term in which the supreme court really, among many other things they did, really we can congress as a brand. i think it is in that context rather than a bona fide legal effort to make alito and th

harry littman, former u.s. attorney and former deputy assistant attorney general and susan glasser, staff writer for the new yorker. andrew, what does this really mean for jack smith selection interference campaign -- excuse me, case against trump connectors lots of reaction but just level set for us. >> sure. small picture. the big picture right away is the decision in terms of what it means for the presidency and checks and balances and this could not be a worse decision in terms of our country. but in terms of what it means for the case, one, there will not be a trial before the general election. there is no way for that to happen. there's too much that would need to happen and too many appeals. two, there likely will be a hearing that judge chutkan has been called upon by the supreme court to have to decide what his official conduct and what is unofficial conduct. and at that hearing, although i think there will be lots of disputes about what evidence can be used, a lot of witnesses can be called, saying yo