this is a catastrophic mistake and i told her then this diagnose from harry reid and democrats will be more justices and more justices on the court -- madam president, if you want to know why roe v. wade has been overturned, it is because harry reid and the democrats sxersed the -- exercised the nuclear option in 2013. had they not done so, there's no way this senate would have confirmed all three of the nominees put forward. it was the direct consequence of the utter disregard for this institution senate democrats have. now, i bring that up because we are at a second moment that is equally consequential, except instead of nuking the senate rules as they did in 2013, senate democrats are preparing to nuke the constitution of the united states itself, the people clause, which every single time that the senate has had jurisdiction and the person has been in office, the senate has held a trial. if senate democrats proceed next week to table that, this they will blow up that precedent, and i'm here to make a predicts. -- predicts. senate democrats sometimes behave like mo small children to

in 2013, harry reid nuked to the filibuster. that did enormous damage to the institution of the united states senate. in 2024, he intends to nuke the impeachment clause of the united states constitution. and make no mistake if this precedent is set, it will not be the last time that it is used. if and when donald trump wins in november and god forbid democrats have the house, they will impeach him again and probably again and again and again. and whatai he's deciding is the senateat no longer has to try impeachment's, but instead can hide behind procedural games. anyone who cares about the security of the country should oppose what he's doing and vote to convict anyone who cares about the united states senate and constitution should demand that a trial be conducted. the american people deserve a trial and i would encourage everyone in the media ask yourself why is he so terrified to have a trial on what is happening in our southern border. the answer is he cannot to defend it and desperately wants to keep it hidden and secret fr

harry reid nuked the filibuster unit that did damage to the institution of the united states senate. of donald trump wins in november god forbid the democrats have the house they would impeach him again. he's deciding on the senate no longer has to try impeachment's but instead can hide behind procedural gains. anyone who cares about the security of the country should oppose what they are doing to convict and anyone that cares about the united states senate and constitution should demand that a trial be conducted. the american people deserve the trial and i would encourage everyone in the media why is he so terrified to have the trial and what is happening on the southern border. the answer is he cannot defend it and desperately wants to keep it hidden and secret from the american people. first of all thank you for sponsoring the press conference and thinks all of you for coming here. i want to thank the legal minds of the conference for laying out why we must hold of the trial. i'm going to make the practical case. the reason he wants to table it is this chart. last week traveling o

in 2013, harry reid nuked the filibuster.that date in or missed damage to the institution of the united states senate. and 2024 chuck schumer and tens to nuke the impeachment clause of the trendy constitution. and make no mistake, if this president is that it will not be the last time it is used -- precedent. if and when donald trump wins in november, if god for bid democrats have the house, they will impeach him again and probably again and again and again. and what chuck schumer is deciding is the senate no longer has to try impeachment, but instead can hide behind procedural games. anyone who cares about the security of this country should oppose what schumer is doing and vote to convict alejandro mayorkas. and anyone who cares about the united states senate and about the united states constitution should demand that a trial be conducted. the american people deserve a trial and i would encourage egg in any media ask yourself, why is chuck schumer so terrified to have a trial on what's happening on our southern border? and

and in fact, actually harry reid in the modern incarnation and one of the reasons he funds the modern pentagon ufo studies is he's mormon and in the faith tradition, you believe actively in possibility of other worlds and other beings and. one of the things that you really see change in last 25 years, which i talk about in the book, because to me this is one of the like the greatest revolution in human understanding we have seen is the math is on the side of the aliens is that we, as late as the 1990s did not understand there was a single planet outside of our own solar system and that we now understand that effectively every star in the universe has planets and that a huge number of them not necessarily a large percentage but a huge number just because of how huge and vast. the universe is fall into what scientists call the goldilocks zone, which is planets that are not too hot, not too cold. support water could support an atmosphere or could support life. as we as we would recognize. and that in numbers. the current estimate is that there. are 1 sextillion habitable planets across t

years, he's a loyal progressive. 90 plus percent voting record with joe biden and chuck schumer and harry reidefore that. and then, of course, you know, in the last few months, he becomes a closet republican.. his last ad, i think, said he's working with republicans, secure the border, which is laughable. he's still paying to fly illegal immigrantss ughable. ino our country. he's paying for their health ille. ontinueir food he's paying to continue to fund sanctuary cities with your taxpayer f dollars, with montana taxpayer dollars. and he's stoppindollg us from deporting violent criminal illegal aliens. so that doesn't sound like s montana values in a state that trump carried by 20 points in a stateg wants a secure border. we have a senator who's opening it wide open and he'border we s paying him to come here. >> time to put a stostopp to it >> now, tim, the media, of course, are seizing on this proposal that yon this u reportedly shared with supporters about wanting to gut the department gut, homeland security. the left is claiming that you're soft on border. ecut i happen to agree with you.

much as harry reid did in 2013 with his judges moving forward invoking the nuclear option. he came back to him and neil gorsuch and 2017. i look forward to my colleagues prosecuting this case on behalf of the merrick and people and sharing why we need to go forward but but this impeachmeno the trial of secretary mallorca's. >> thank you senator. >> a charitable interpretation of what senator schumer is planning to do does not exist. it doesn't. he is going to make a motion to table or to dismiss the work done by the u.s. house of representatives. and our 200 plus history we have had 21 public officials impeached by the united states house of representatives. we in the senate have held trials and all but three. in three instances we dismissed the charges because the officials resigned. the other incident we dismissed the charges because it involved the senate and we did not believe we had the authority to hold an impeachment -- now those are the facts. i fully expect senator schumer to try to muddy up the water and to try to make it look deep but. we are either going to foll

the harry reid machine got one across the line but pulling shows -- pulled out -- polling -- casey is and an open seat in michigan where republicans like their front runner candidate mike rogers a lot. there are many possible routes to a senate majority. the main question is, what is the republican margin because if it goes from 51-41, the swing votes go from kyrsten sinema to joe manchin to perhaps susan collins who are functionally more like independence. if republicans win a majority, then donald trump if elected would have much more leeway to confirm cabinet appointees and pass an agenda. host: this is mike in indiana, independent line. caller: i couldn't vote for a democrat or republican right now. they blame stuff on people and it is not true. the person when they talked about trump and election interference and this trial about him having these documents and biden having them, the one that is responsible for it is the people that take care of it, the cia, fbi, and they should be a reason when they do something like that, they should be the ones who go to jail. host: to the degr

this is a catastrophic mistake and i told her then this diagnose from harry reid and democrats will be more justices and more justices on the court -- madam president, if you want to know why roe v. wade has been overturned, it is because harry reid and the democrats sxersed the -- exercised the nuclear option in 2013. had they not done so, there's no way this senate would have confirmed all three of the nominees put forward. it was the direct consequence of the utter disregard for this institution senate democrats have. now, i bring that up because we are at a second moment that is equally consequential, except instead of nuking the senate rules as they did in 2013, senate democrats are preparing to nuke the constitution of the united states itself, the people clause, which every single time that the senate has had jurisdiction and the person has been in office, the senate has held a trial. if senate democrats proceed next week to table that, this they will blow up that precedent, and i'm here to make a predicts. -- predicts. senate democrats sometimes behave like mo small children to

we need to take out harry reid's last remnant of rosen. >> laura: oh, the last remnant.ed navy seal, a lot of vets here, active firefighting pilot is running neck and neck with democratic incumbent jon tester who has failed montana ans acting as a rubber stamp for all of bide president's policies. tim joins me now. tim, tester has tried to carry himself out as kind of a rugged person from montana. has a hair cut. he tries to play the role but when has he stood up for the working class? >> five out of every six years he's a loyal progressive. 9 plus percent roting record for joe biden. he's working with republicans to secure the board which is laughable. he's still playing to fly illegal immigrants into our country, paying for their healthcare and food. he's paying to continue to fund sanctuary cities with your tax payer dollars, with montana tax payer dollars and he's stopping us from getting rid of illegal aliens. in a state that wants a secure border we have a senator who is opening it wide open and he's paying them to come here. time to put a stop to it. >> laura: tim

doing two shots -- 82-shot is where they would show both anchors, but they were afraid to show harry reid's listening to barbara walters on the air because he was so often scholarly. host: evidence can say, he would spell and make a physical response to her without having term -- he could scowl susan: abc started to get letters from viewers seeing what is going on. finally they wrote a letter in response and said, please give it some time. we know this to work out all right. that's how bad it was. barbara walters, she found she was failing, dragging. she said her head wondering what where she was not entirely sure if she would recover, if her recoverable or if her ambitions had gotten so big that it would undermine the achievements she had already had. first, let me take you to december of 19 77. president jimmy carter was visiting iran, new year's eve with the shah. barbara and i were both working for abc news. the car was waiting for me to whisk me over to a local museum where it misses carter, without the president, it was going to go visit right after the airport. i get to this sedan wa

i heard harry reid, the democrat leader of the senate, say in the supreme court at a dinner, the mostkable thing about bush v. gore is never remarked. what? well, in his view, he said that case hurt a lot of people. that was his view. not surprising. about half the country felt that way, maybe a few more than half. and it was wrong. that was my opinion. and i suspect it was his opinion. but people did follow it. and i say at stanford when i'm talking to students when i tell them that. a great victory for the rule of law. i know one-third of you think there should have been some paving stones thrown. you're sorry there weren't a few riots and so forth. but before you conclude that, turn on your television set. not this program. but turn on your television set and see how people decide things in countries where they don't follow a rule of law. >> do you worry about that now, mr. justice? >> you're always worried about it. >> why will people follow the law, the rulings of the court, when in dobbs, justices who have said when they're being confirmed, i will follow precedent, stare decisis

the moment was when harry reid then, majority leader of the senate, told me that he had been instructed by the obama white house to cut the knees out from nancy pelosi and kill off her cap trade bill that she had fought through the house and actually passed. and that were going to do nothing on it. it was just going to shrivel up and die because people were tired. they'd been all this rancor about health care and obamacare and just want a little bit more peace and quiet. is that in the book? yeah, kind of generally, yes. and really infuriated me. and that's why i started doing these my time to wake up speeches. nobody was talking about climate back then. i just well, --, every week somebody's going to talk about climate. it's going to be me. it's going to be me. and as i did that, i started looking into what the hell went wrong. because when i got to the senate, climate was a bipartisan issue. you had a lot of people with by bills. and then january ten, all of that died like heart attack, just bang. what happened in january of 2010? citizens united and the fossil industry was ready for

the chief of staff to that then majority leader of the senate, harry reid, wrote to the fcc chairman.e said he had spoken to the white house again and "told them to back off title ii." went through once again the problems it creates for us. majority leader reid's chief of staff followed up, "my main point to the white house is how can you declare that regulations written in the 1930's will work fine for 2014 technology?" that is a good question. "let tom do his job and everything will be fine," he ended. except that the white house did not let the fcc chaired do his job. -- chair do his job. the president intervened. reflecting on the white house campaign while testifying before congress, fcc chairman wheeler was asked about president obama's november 10 announcement and whether it had an impact on the title ii debate at the fcc. he testified, "of course it did." continuing, he said, "when jeff came to me and said, this is what the president is going to do, that was substantial significance." the testimony is true. emails confirmed that the fcc stopped the presses on its compromise or

ali vitali and the weekend she is the former chief spokesperson for vice-president harris and reid guylend he worked on a number of gop campaigns including john mccain, arnold arnold schwarzenegger and george w. bush. simone trump said leave it up to the states. this is what that looks like. a civil war era law now back into effect. how poorly thought out was this position he put out yesterday, especially now? >> well, i will say this. i think that donald trump is doing and saying whatever he thinks can get him elected. he has no principle. there is no ground for him to stand on because the ground shifts and moves according to what he thinks will get him what he wants. in the statement he put out he talked about you have to understand what is on people's parties but it is about winning. he says it's about winning. >> how is this a winning strategy. >> it is not a wink strategy. this is insane. women in arizona right now there is a 14-day stay on this decision. but in 14-days, you can't get an abortion if you need one in arizona. the video the biden campaign featured amanda, she had a misca

the harry reid machine got one across the line but pulling shows -- pulled out -- polling -- casey is and an open seat in michigan where republicans like their front runner candidate mike rogers a lot. there are many possible routes to a senate majority. the main question is, what is the republican margin because if it goes from 51-41, the swing votes go from kyrsten sinema to joe manchin to perhaps susan collins who are functionally more like independence. if republicans win a majority, then donald trump if elected would have much more leeway to confirm cabinet appointees and pass an agenda. host: this is mike in indiana, independent line. caller: i couldn't vote for a democrat or republican right now. they blame stuff on people and it is not true. the person when they talked about trump and election interference and this trial about him having these documents and biden having them, the one that is responsible for it is the people that take care of it, the cia, fbi, and they should be a reason when they do something like that, they should be the ones who go to jail. host: to the degr

book, do you talk about how vice president harris slept with a black man, congressman or politician and really that's how she got her start. and what about tara reid, who accused president biden of rain? guest: there is a lot that's brought up. a lot of people like to talk about her relationship with a person -- one of the most powerful black politicians in california, willie brown. you will see people talk about this and even some people mistakenly say that kamala harris slept her way to the top. she certainly dated willie brown when he was running for mayor. kamala was 29. willie brown was 60. he was running for mayor at a time when he needed to prove he could maintain a stable relationship because he was already long estranged from his wife and he was known as something of a playboy. but when he ran for mayor, he had this relationship with kamala harris and his own campaign managers floated that as a way for him to prove to voters that he could maintain a stable relationship as he was running for mayor of california. after willie brown won that race, kamala harris was at the election celebration party, and people were talking about how maybe br

book, do you talk about how vice president harris slept with a black man, congressman or politician and really that's how she got her start. and what about tara reid, who accused president biden of rain? guest: there is a lot that's brought up. a lot of people like to talk about her relationship with a person -- one of the most powerful black politicians in california, willie brown. you will see people talk about this and even some people mistakenly say that kamala harris slept her way to the top. she certainly dated willie brown when he was running for mayor. kamala was 29. willie brown was 60. he was running for mayor at a time when he needed to prove he could maintain a stable relationship because he was already long estranged from his wife and he was known as something of a playboy. but when he ran for mayor, he had this relationship with kamala harris and his own campaign managers floated that as a way for him to prove to voters that he could maintain a stable relationship as he was running for mayor of california. after willie brown won that race, kamala harris was at the election celebration party, and people were talking about how maybe br

harris will continue the fight for abortion rights. he's blaming the extreme agenda of republican lawmakers for this let's bring in paula reid because paul obviously this is a drawn-out process and it's not exactly clear how things are going to go, given that the attorney general has pledged that she's not going to enforce this law. so ultimately, what happens next? >> so in terms of the process, there's certainly a role as the governor just said, for the state legislature to rewrite right a new law that we've seen in other states where similar things have happened. for example, in wisconsin, it was a judge that stepped in and actually said, no, this doesn't make all abortions illegal. we know that this case is also getting kicked back down to the lower courts for additional proceedings. we also saw, for example, in michigan, a judge, excuse me, the governor repealed at 19 in 31 ban last spring. so there's a lot of possibilities here, but usually i'm at the table with you guys talking about trump's legal problems. and i can tell you that this case and those like it will have a far greater impact on trump's chances for reelection. than an

reid out." >> just minutes ago standing beside speaker johnson donald trump just said the collection of state bans is, quote, working the way it is supposed to. >> vice president kamala harris a short time ago in arizona delivering a scathing rebuke. also tonight, trump rarely steps foot into church and yet he's increasingly stoking christian nationalist sentiment which was once at the fringes of politics and is now almost totally consumed the republican party. plus, two election deniers get together in florida to talk about, air quotes, election integrity as speaker maga mike johnson clings to donald trump in hopes of saving his stumbly, bumbly, unproductive and all around disastrous speakership. >>> but we begin tonight with small but important signs of hope for our 248-year-old democracy. yes, it remains under severe threat from donald trump and his christian nationalist party, just not for the reasons he's telling you. what is set to begin in a manhattan courtroom on monday is not an attack on democracy, it's actually a sign of its health and evidence that it can still function the way it was intended to. to help explain i want to take a brief trip to italy and introduc

harry potter stars who threw j.k. rowling under the bus for stating basic biological facts. reacting to the big stories of the day, my top pundits tonight claire pearsall mike reida mckenzie . plus, the most mckenzie. plus, the most important part of the show your opinions. get your views in @gbnews .com forward slash usa. that's right gbnews.com/yoursay and this show has a golden rule we don't do boring. not on my watch. i just won't have it. especially on a saturday night. now listen, have you got a drink in your hand? glass of wine, a been in your hand? glass of wine, a beer, an alcohol free guinness ? beer, an alcohol free guinness? other drinks are available. or what about a lovely pot of yorkshire tea? whatever you've got in your hands, let's get to work. because it's a busy two hours and we start with my big opinion. remember when stonewall was about standing up for gay people, but wound up throwing lesbians and gays under the bus in the name of trans ideology ? in the name of trans ideology? remember when greenpeace was all about saving the planet, but decided to become overtly political and threatened the prime minister's safety with a dangerous stunt a