let's go to harry rosen. can you answer the question? did you agree with the president today?h the president today. i'm grateful for what the president said and thought it was a remarkable display of leadership and damn the consequences. there may be consequences, i don't personally believe it. what dana just said is very interesting because we've seen it all day almost starting from mitt romney when he started to hedge a little bit about how these issues are sort of very touching and sensitive for people. the republicans and conservatives are actually afraid to take on the issue directly. because they know that there are gays and lesbians in republican families, in conservative families, in catholic families, and they only want to talk about, you know, the process. about how -- they want to criticize the president for how he's done it or what he's done or what his motives are when this was in essence the most nonpolitical thing that could have happened this week and spontaneously happen this week and yet they know that if they attack him directly on the issue, they come acros

rosen in d.c. for us. thank you. harris: there is a lot of information there.s we're going to bring in judge andrew napolitano, fox senior judicial analyst. and you're smiling because my first question has to do with losing privacy to the government. you and i are talking we'll never know even if they're looking at us. >> that is correct, harris. james has done a great job in getting his arms around the numbers here which are truly staggering. there are other numbers that are not a part of this report that are part of this program and those are self-written search warrants where fbi agent don't go to the fisa court but authorize themselves to examine information, not from you, but about you. your banking records, your computer records, your telephone records, your medical records, your legal records. if you take all of this together, what they're going to the fisa court and the fisa court is letting them get and what they get on their own if, whatever they obtain on individuals, if they don't use it in a prosecution against those persons, then they never know t