the most hartening e-mails i get are from people who tip owe don't follow our proceedings or don't work in this field so much, but citizens out there in the country who say thanks for publishing it. i might agree disagree with what you did but at least i can see now what you were actually doing. there, the openness and transparency has been. i don't think it's a big deal to let the public know what the commission is doing in advance. as for a burden, i think it has focused the ex parte meetings they have had in the weeks leading up to a meeting. instead of the hushed conversation that parties to the commission -- we have heard this might be a paragraph, can you confirm or deny it. the commissioner would describe what was non-public information. well, i can't confirm or deny it but you might be on the right track. it was a strange game of wink, wink, nod, nod, here it's out there, no innuendo, nothing but the cold hard text of the document that explains it in cold hard english. for the staff the urden changed. i wouldn't say it's increased. with you it's changed. previously the staff wou