do you have a -- >> supervisor safai: no, i -- honestly, i think working with director hartly and thinking about how nonprofits would be impacted, they tried to work, i think with the department of environment to craft some language that made the most sense, and they came up without the words, "without incurring significant hardship." that was subjective, and i think that was intentionally left to be a discussion between the director and the department and the nonprofit. but i think it is very purposefully designed to say if the nonprofit were to come back and say this is something we cannot do, then the director has the authority to push the effectiveness onto them. our intent as a legislator and this body, and the way we've written it, one is to push back the date two years before this will be affecting any nonprofit and to give an additional year, and now we're giving them even additional authority to say for any of the nonprofits. but even still if you wanted to make the additional amendment, i'm fine with that. what i'm committed to, and i think the department is committed to is worki