. —— by hashem abedi. e security service and the significance of the other two topics should not be underestimated. it is important that we understand as much as we can about the radicalisation of salman abedi so that similar signs can be recognised and appropriate action taken. it is also important that we know in detail about the preparation for the attack so that measures can be brought in which would have prevented the killers acquiring the knowledge and materials they needed to carry out the attack. radicalisation. the inquiry heard evidence from doctor wilkinson, his evidence detailed the differences between followers of mainstream islam who are the overwhelming majority and are accepting of and exist peacefully alongside people of different faiths and those he identified as a violent islamist extremists, who believe in a narrow in group, who believe they are the only ones with the correct worldview. they are prepared to use violence against members of out groups which includes anyone who is not part

the planning and salman abedi, the planning and preparation for the attack by salman abedi and hashem abedi could have been prevented by. the security service , security service, counter—terrorism, policing . counter—terrorism, policing. while most public interest will focus on the attack could or should have been prevented and, the role of the security service , the significance of the other two topics should not be underestimated . it is it is underestimated. it is it is important that we understand and as much as we can about the radicalisation of abedi so that similar signs can be recognised and appropriate taken . it is and appropriate taken. it is also important that we know in detail about the preparations for the attack so that measures can be in, which would which would have prevented the killers acquiring the knowledge and materials they needed to carry out the attack . radicalisation . out the attack. radicalisation. the inquiry heard evidence from dr. wilkinson and his detailed the differences . followers of the differences. followers of mainstream who are the overwhelming and o

chairman, repeatedly stressed that responsibility for the bombing rested with brothers salman and hashem abediover what went wrong so no one has to suffer in his word such terrible pain and loss again. he identified the failings of the venue, of the emergency services and of the security services and the families have described the possibility that the attack could have been thwarted as a devastating conclusion, but they've also paid tribute both to sirjohn and his team for their unwavering determination to uncover the truth and also to those who looked after them through the process, the support unit and what was called the resilience hope and interestingly the government has announced its setting up a permanent expert panel to help people after major tragedies in england and wales. this was an inquiry about learning lessons and perhaps one of the lessons is that the inquiry itself found a good balance between the need for dispassionate legal detachment and just as much needed, humanity is like mark easton, thank you. police have tonight charged constance marten and mark gordon with gross neg

salman abedi's brothers, ismail and hashem, were also significant influences.estigation revealed they both had large amounts of material relating to is. ismail, bbc news. can i ask you a few questions, please? ismail refused to give evidence to the inquiry or talk to the bbc and is now in libya. why won't you speak to the inquiry? hashem was jailed for life for his part in planning the arena attack. disengaged, angry, salman abedi was, according to one expert witness to the arena inquiry, ripe for radicalisation. his close family clearly...held the law in this country in pretty scant regard. it didn't really matter too much if they broke it. that was the first thing. so he had no connection to the legal side of british life, in the sense of being law—abiding, getting a law—abiding world view, as we've already mentioned, for various reasons, such as lack of parental support. he didn't engage with that massive mechanism of mainstream education. that wasn't open to him, although he did try, to be fair. he had various moments when he tried to engage. erm, and so, r

to have been an active factor or cause the radicalisation of suicide bomber salman abedi and his accomplice brother hashemhe mosque had a wilful blindness to a highly charged debate about . libya. and charged debate about. libya. and there was a statement read out on the steps of the inquiry afterwards that was very, very about mosque. what i am intrigued by that the mosques response to a lot of this to be to say that they are being demonised eased and that this is a right and it's been lapped up by the usual types who will say the are more mosque the headlines are more mosque defends actually defends itself are not actually things well what's the things like well what's the report about the mosque is report said about the mosque is that political correctness getting in the way of us having a discussion what is and a discussion about what is and isn't and some mosques in isn't said and some mosques in the country . i think we the country. well i think we should give credit to places of worship that do fantastic work when comes to interfaith dialogue and such cohesion. but we should also be free to questio