but the third hashmark, i don't see a 15 and i don't see a 22. so i don't see a 21 and 22 on the hashmarks at that point in time and no longer corresponds to the information on the ledsing. something about the way the legend is displays stops being meaningful when you get into the forecast. it seems meaningful in the history, but not in the forecast. if there were a reason it would be much more helpful to me. >> i think on the graph they used a midpoint. whereas the bottom they didn't. so that maybe why we're not quite corresponding. >> 14 and 19 would average out to be a little -- it would be about 16 or 17%. >> that is correct. >> and 21 would be 21. so on that one you have 21. >> correct. >> for whatever reason with express scripts you don't use a range, cvs and caremark you do. >> it depends on how their report presented their findings, their data and we reflected that out. >> so it makes caremark looks better as express scripts for whatever reason. >> for whatever reason. >> so this is instruct ive about chartss and graphs and something to b