so again, as commissioner hasz mentioned mr. ion an is looking for a site where we can have this special meeting and we certainly want to broadcast it as much as possible to encourage the public to participate as well. >> what's the date for that? >> it will be may 21st as your regularly scheduled hearing that is being proposed to not cancel but to move off site for a more conducive discussion. >> will that meeting be recorded? or televised? >> that is an item that does not appear on your agenda. but i did have a conversation with sf gov. tv. san francisco television to make sure that it is recorded that it is on-site for people who could not attend. >> if there is nothing further i would like to make an announcement under commission matters, my direct back up and you will be seeing her when she officially starts. she'll be shadowing me. >> great. if nothing else, we'll close this meeting. [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >> >> (clapping.) ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ i think we have more companies anywhere in the united states it's at the amazing stat

>> right. >> on that motion, commissioner highland, jong, matsuda, hasz. that passes unanimously. and places you on item 10. item 10: 2013.0693a s. caltagirone; 4155 558-66255 940 grove street, north side between steiner and fillmore streets. assessor's block 0798, lot 010. request for certificate of appropriateness to revise the rehabilitation project previously approved under hpc motion no. 0147, including: 11 modifying the configuration and location of the new garage; 22 modifying the location of window and door openings at the north and east facades and replacing windows at all facades; 33 replacing the historic wood siding at the north faÇade; 44 reinstalling a window at the west gable end at the attic level to match the previous condition; 55 increasing the height of the third floor deck and reconfiguring the elevator penthouse roof; 66 restoring the front doors and roof finials; 77 constructing a balcony at the east faÇade; and, 88 adding fencing and gates to the landscape. please note that many of the proposed changes have already been completed and that the applicant is r

on that motion, commissioner highland, johnck, matsuda, hasz. that motion passes 6-0. that places you on item 11. item11: t. frye; 4155 575-68222 preservation element - draft preservation element of the san francisco general plan - request for review and comment. the planning department seeks comments on the most recent draft in order to produce a final draft preservation element to bring before the historic preservation commission and the planning commission for endorsement at a sf 111234 >> commissioner highland? >> i don't have to recuse myself. since there is no action that we are approving today i can still participate. if that were to change, i would have to recuse myself. i wasn't aware of the project anyway. >> are they still on? their work was complete? >> their work was completed and it was done by catherine and -- they are not there anymore. >> thank you. mr. fry? >> good afternoon commissioners, tim fry, department staff. as you recall the previous discussions over the budget and your review over the recreation and open space element, the commission asked t

i did make a ton and i'm sure commissioner hasz has a ton of notes about where we would like to make some suggested edit. >> okay. we can certainly send this to you in advance or with a longer lead time. >> thank you. commissioner highland? >> this is a question for mr. fry. the process of approving the elements in the general plan is that all under the purview of the planning commission? >> to my knowledge, yes. >> that's why this particular element is only here for our endorsement then? >> that's correct. as for one of the guiding documents of this body, i feel it definitely makes sense for us to spend a lot of time on it. that's why we are here today. >> did it change anything that it's the landmark's advisory board and now it doesn't change anything oovm that's correct. in terms of the general plan, it remains the same. >> commissioner johnck? >> i want to comment and ask the question. i appreciate your presentation and seeing the nesting of all these elements. i guess, i think we've been very sensitized during the discussion of the park and the discussion of the national heritag

it hasz to do with the proper disposal of radioactive materials. >> in december, 2010, bowers sent thesee-mails to managers documenting trucks shipping dirt away. and tanks full of thousands of gallons of water marked as contaminated. >> reporter: and what can that do to our public health? >> you have the concern with potential bone cancer. things like that down the road. >> he says the public can't be confident soil leaving hunter's point and soil that remains here to be used as back fill is radiation free. e alleged management cut corners to save money. >> it has been botched. it's been botched. >> it's not right. they can't be shipping potentially contaminated soil as clean landfill. this can't be done. >> andrea says she raised a red flag. it's a portal monitor, a device that sounds an alarm when it detekts radiation. this is an internal manual obtained by the nbc bay area invesz gaitive unit. >> they're trying to get dirt out that's contaminated. >> major problems she witnessed and shared with us her personal logbook that tracked the trucks leaving hunter's point. >> at the end, the