but in this case, rachel's dad don hatfield was only too happy to help.of his daughter's behavior -- just too much like his own once was. and don was a guy who'd been carrying his guilt like a cross for years. >> i tried to lead all of my children to the love of jesus christ. there was only one major obstacle to that ever occurring in a way that -- that i would be happy with. and that was my hypocrisy. >> what do you mean? >> huh? >> your hypocrisy? >> my hypocrisy -- chasing women -- >> uh-huh. >> blowing my marriage. >> reporter: as don tells it, women found his role as an ascendant artist quite appealing. never mind he was a married father of four. >> and that kind of thing destroyed this - literally, destroyed my family. >> reporter: by the time rachel was in middle school, don's string of affairs led to a home-shattering divorce. >> i think that the -- the obliteration of the nuclear family had a profound effect on rachel. >> reporter: now, he feared, the apple hadn't fallen far from the tree. his daughter rachel was in the middle of an affair hersel

but in this case, rachel's dad don hatfield was only too happy to help.not approve of his daughter's behavior -- just too much like his own once was. and don was a guy who'd been carrying his guilt like a cross for years. >> i tried to lead all of my children to the love of jesus christ. there was only one major obstacle to that ever occurring in a way that -- that i would be happy with. and that was my hypocrisy. >> what do you mean? >> huh? >> your hypocrisy? >> my hypocrisy -- chasing women -- >> uh-huh. >> blowing my marriage. >> reporter: as don tells it, women found his role as an ascendant artist quite appealing. never mind he was a married father of four. >> and that kind of thing destroyed this - literally, destroyed my family. >> reporter: by the time rachel was in middle school, don's string of affairs led to a home-shattering divorce. >> i think that the -- the obliteration of the nuclear family had a profound effect on rachel. >> reporter: now, he feared, the apple hadn't fallen far from the tree. his daughter rachel was in the middle of an a

international space station commander chris hadfield sang a version of the song at the end of his mission hatfield changed the lyrics slightly so that major tom returned to earth safe and sound to. you. after the apollo 11 mission required a massive effort an estimated 400000 people took part in developing the technology the moon landing had a huge influence on the movies nasa itself delivered spectacular pictures in july 969 shortly before takeoff it was perhaps the greatest human adventure of all time and would be covered on live t.v. like the one. now stars. represent a man. that's relatively difficult to answer. a new documentary on apollo 11 features digitally restored footage from nasa because some of the video has never been seen before. you have to kind of what all doubt one of the key moments what were the moments of humanity that out there what were the things that stood out what really got me was the emotion on their faces you could see the weight of what they were about to do. the film celebrates the heroes of this historic mission. the world of cinema has always been fascinated with t

you had people like robert packwood and hatfield and stafford. they're all gone. >> going way back. >> but they're all gone. you have arguably susan collins and that's it. and in the house of representatives in 1974, when richard nixon was under investigation, you had moderate republicans in the house of representatives. you had them on the supreme court. anthony kennedy, john paul stevens. they're all gone. they're gone everywhere. and that's really the story of american politics right now. >> yeah, and so, obviously, as we pointed out, times have changed. we're in a particularly hyperpartisan moment. what i've heard shift is that what republicans had been arguing up until yesterday was the process. this process is all wrong. this process isn't working. there's been no vote. now there's been a vote. so now what i hear them saying is, well, the president didn't do anything wrong anyway. >> well, sort of. some of them are saying that. >> the most -- that's what the white house is saying. that's what matt schlapp just said. there's nothing wrong an

mark >> caller: hey, jimbo, a big hatfield, p.a. boo-yah to you. mark my question this evening is about lhx. that's a combination of level three merged with harris technologies. >> and i like the stock very much i think it is a buy right here and i think that actually if you get it below 210 is a good situation. that's the conclusion of "the lightning round. >> announcer: "the lightning round" is sponsored by td ameritrade ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ the amount of student loan debt i have, i'm embarrassed to even say. we just decided we didn't want debt any longer. ♪ i didn't realize how easy investing could be. i'm picking companies that i believe in. ♪ i think sofi money is amazing. ♪ thank you sofi. sofi thank you, we love you. ♪ >>> at what point does it become safe to circle back to the formerly red hot tech stocks that became public pagerduty. pd for you home gamers that helps clients monitor online presence so they can spot problems and fix them before you find them. when major had its ipo in april the stock's price at 24 surged to 38 and changed by the end o

needed at a later date, so we are now asking that any clothing people want to donate, they sent it to hatfieldntact the reverend online, and she will be able to store it there for you, because we are going to need it at a later date. the effect on the village has been very severe. there isa village has been very severe. there is a very high level of damage. houses that have been in submerged, in some cases, almost up to the u psta i rs in some cases, almost up to the upstairs windows. the damage will ta ke upstairs windows. the damage will take a very long time to clear and, while we have had quite a traumatic few days, we have a very traumatic period coming up now as people who have been evacuated come back to see their ruined properties. i'vejust been talking to a young couple who have lost two cars, all their possessions in the lower of the house, things they couldn't move out. today they have been house hunting 16 miles away to try and find another house. they might have to change schools for the children. the repercussions of a flight like this are not just the repercussions of a flight l

one confirmation and one polarized combination leads to another and another and it's like a hatfield and mccoy's at this point and by the time you are nominated it was 37 senators who voted against you and that seems extraordinary. >> why do you know that and i don't? >> i looked it up. >> oh, okay. >> i had a sense thatzy few thought i have a funny feeling what even makes it worse is that it's what was called a cheap vote. it's easy for republicans to vote against you and they know c if you will get confirmed they get to say how do we back out of that that sets a whole or i polarizing way in a partisan way and i'm sure you said this to others is not good for the courts legitimacy and is there anyway to undo that? >> i'm not in a position to be able to wave a magic wand and there's a lot of history and water under the dam. everybody feels victimized by everybody else. i will say that it is long past time and everybody on the court feels this way and there were times not so long ago when justus glia got confirmed by a 90-zero vote when justice ginsburg got confirmed by a similar margi

it's sort of like the hatfields and mccoy's at this point. nominated, you were there were 37 senators who voted against you. that seems extraordinary. >> why do you know that and i don't know that? >> it seems crazy. i have a sense that maybe a few of them thought you would be too liberal but i have a funny feeling at this point is what makes it worse is what sometimes we to call on capitol hill a cheap vote. it's easy for a republican to vote against you and they know you will get confirmed so they get the best of both worlds. you get confirmed and they get to say they voted against you. ?ow do we back out of that that sets the whole thing up in a polarized and partisan way. it's really not good for the court legitimacy. is there any way to undo that? >> i don't know and i'm not in the position to be able to wave a magic wand and do it post up there is a lot of history and a lot of water under the dam and everybody feels victimized by everybody else. past time it's long to stop that. i think everybody in the court feels this way. there are t

can back out of that, one confirmation, one polarized confirmation leads to another and it's like hatfield and mccoy's at this point and by the time you were nominated, there were 37 senators who voted against you and it seems extraordinary. >> why do you know that and i don't know that. >> i looked it up. [laughter] >> it seems crazy and i have a sense that maybe you thought you were going to be too liberal but i think at this point what makes it worse it's what they would've called on capitol hill, a cheapo, it's easy for a republican to vote against you and they know you get confirmed so they get the best of both worlds, you get confirmed and they get to see they voted against you. how do we back out of that because that sets the whole thing up in a polarized partisan way and i'm sure i've heard you say and it's really not good for the court legitimacy. is there anyway to undo that? >> i don't know and i'm certainly not in a position to be able to wave a magic wand into it. there is a lot of history in order under the dam and everybody feels victimized by everybody else. but i will say

it's sort of like hatfields and mccoys at this point.y the time you were nominated, there were 37 senators who voted against you and that seems extraordinary. >> why do you know that and i don't know that? >> because i looked it up. >> okay. >> but it seems crazy, and i have a sense that maybe they thought you were going to be too liberal. but i have a funny feeling at this point what even makes it worse is that it's what sometimes we used to call on capitol hill a cheap vote. it's easy for a republican to vote against you. they can tell the base i voted against her and they know that you're going to get confirmed so they get the best of both worlds. you get confirmed and they get to say they voted against you. how do we back out of that? because that sets the whole thing up in a very polarized and partisan way. and i'm sure i've heard you say and others that it's really not good for the court's legitimacy. is there any way to undo that? >> i don't know, and i'm certainly -- you know, i'm not in a position to be able to wave a magic wand