but in this case, rachel's dad don hatfield was only too happy to help.ter's behavior -- just too much like his own once was. and don was a guy who'd been carrying his guilt like a cross for years. >> i tried to lead all of my children to the love of jesus christ. there was only one major obstacle to that ever occurring in a way that -- that i would be happy with. and that was my hypocrisy. >> what do you mean? >> huh? >> your hypocrisy? >> my hypocrisy -- chasing women -- >> uh-huh. >> blowing my marriage. >> as dawn tells, it women found his role as an ascendant artist quite appealing, never mind he was a married father of four. >> and that kind of thing destroyed this - literally, destroyed my family. >> by the time rachel was in middle school, don's string of affairs led to a home-shattering divorce. >> i think that the -- the obliteration of the nuclear family had a profound effect on rachel. >> now he feared the apple hadn't fallen far from the tree. his daughter rachel was in the middle of an affair herself, and it was putting her marriage at risk.

>> it comes from the story of the hatfield and mccoy feud which many people may have heard of but very quickly, you know, in 1878 along with the big sandy river with farming the land and randolph mccoy thought that he recognized one of the pigs on hatfield's farm and stole it from his. no one could convince him to drop it so they complained to the authorities, organized the trial, he lost the trial and that wasn't a great experience for him, but he let it roll off and everyone moved on. it was a group conflict because they had many relatives all over the area and in the first year and a half after the trial, they got in a fight with a witness who testified and they beat the man to death so this is when the feud became sort of combusted and morphed over the course of the next decade it was a vigilante shooting. women were beaten, people were drawn in across the region. i explained this to say one of the conditions that leads to high conflict in every case i look at our powerful group identities. when we experience collective emotion, geometrically it compounds the conflict. if someone i

this is not entirely unprecedented, chris hatfield famously performed a rendition of david bowie's spacearth. be a sort of conscious uncoupling, you might say. music gets everywhere. more on those stories on the website. from me and the team, i will see you soon. hello again. friday was all about sunshine and showers. the best of the drier weather and sunshine was across western areas of the uk. but across northern and eastern scotland, eastern areas of england, we did have widespread showers, and some of them really pokey with some hail mixed in as well. at the same time, over the last 2a hours, trouble's been brewing out in the atlantic. look at this area of cloud and how it's rapidly developed into what is quite a beautiful looking area of low pressure. however, this area of low pressure is a loitering low pressure system, a particularly slow moving system that's going to be with us for the next five days or so, bringing rain and showers our way. so, an unsettled spell of weather. the rain is beginning to arrive at the moment and will continue to work its way in across parts of englan

norms and cultures within congress the foster more collaboration that are not persistently the hatfield's and mccoy's. often the size of the gymnasium throwing rocks at each other. there's a keen interest by members of our committee work at issues related to >> engagement. how do we engage our constituents. going to elevate and continue to work on or issues related continuity of congress. our committee did make ami number of recommendations based on how to get through pandemic. we did not look at the type of large-scale attack or crisis that could cripple congress to make action. more work needs to be done there.is these all came up in our discussion as a committee during our bipartisan retreat. i will alsoo mention we did something a little bit different. we brought in an outside facilitator just to talk about january 6 and some of the dynamic coming out of january 6. how shapes the work of our committee and how ite. may make more challenging the work of ourwa committee. i think that was an important conversation. you've seen in a number of committees issues related to january 6 have sta

. >> stephen: hatfields andmccoys. >> if someone's trying to murder someone with a be able to bat andpeople hitting each other with baseball bats. i'm, like, ted cruz is a fascist. he denies the reality of the election. his words cause people to die, and i'm making jokes about it. is that a feud? i don't know. to me, it doesn't seem like a feud. to me, seems like i'm pointing out the fact that he is a terrible man whose words have resulted in death, you know, and i guess, to me, yeah, like -- i mean, it speaks to what i think is a bigger problem in america which is a false equivalency, and i was going to use the term "between the right and tet" which makes it seem like two appendage as of the same creature, which i don't think it is. i think one is -- one is a creature and the other's just trying to stop it from destroying the country, and, so, i don't know if, like, is that a feud? i don't know. are those two things on the sd , i thto yke, that may be the left feels ineffective in comparison to how they should, but it's like if you were playing baseball against a team and, like, you'

the republicans had people like chuck percy and illinois and, mark hatfield and oregon clinton decide more with the democrats on a lot of issues with carter fully had a democratic president. if you are used to politics today it was different back then. and of course the producing states were well represented. because russell long was chairman of the finance committee and back in the 50s texas had both the speaker of the house and the majority leader in the senate. that a lot of influence on the legislation not covered energy. outside the scope of my book even something like the panama canal treaty which is very controversial, one of the person to help point of the votes for that is howard baker who was the republican leader. at the little bit hard to imagine it happening like that today. >> that is right. another division that also influence the energy policy was over the environment. that also did not follow party lines strictly. would you talk about that? >> it is interesting because a few years ago somebody did a ranking of american presidents on the environment. richard nixon and

. >> thank you doctor hatfield for your testimony the third witness professor of pharmaceutical economics and cold investigator of the drug supply project at the university of minnesota having more than 45 years of research studying the pharmaceutical marketplace welcome doctor you may proceed with your five-minute opening remarks may thank you members of the committee to provide input on the resilience of the us drug supply. first i would ask what was the state of the drug supply prior to the pandemic everyone needs prescription drugs in their life americans come to count on for life-threatening diseases such as diabetes and epilepsy and cancer we expect these medications will be available add a pharmacy or the local pharmacy when needed. even before the pandemic drug shortages were a serious problem with the web the factors in the opaque drug supply system. we reported on drug shortages for more than two decades we have had more than 170 drugs in shortage at every point in time since 2014 or before. 170 drugs in shortage at every point of time this ongoing rate is unacceptable. yet for