of care was here was that because of the abilities -- what is the difference between waterloo at hattiesburg -- and gettysburg? railroads there is no that waterloo to there is -- waterloo there is no railroads or the ability to sustain an army. it is much more difficult for the french to reconstitute their army. the panic spread. civil war armies were better supply, and in some respects were more resilient because of the sort of weaponry they had, the logistical system they had to support them, it enabled them to recover from damaging battles. you think about the battle of gettysburg where these armies lose 20,009. how do they continue to function? they continue to function because the system that sustains them is well-developed. >> real quick. battles of annihilation are hard to achieve because the soldiers come from the same citizen soldier tradition. they have the same type of training that makes it harder to achieve an edge on one another. >> i would turn towards what i think is the single best military history of the war, how the north won. the argument is that it is a policy of exhaust

we have robber calling from hattiesburg, mississippi on the line for independents. good morning. caller: hello. host: you are on the air. good morning. caller: yes. can you hear me? host: we can hear you just fine. what is on your mind? caller: i wanted to ask if there is a probability of somebody coming up with an intercontinental drone. host: from our last segment? what do you think about that? i imagine they can fly at that range. caller: all they have to do is put enough, fill it up with enough fuel to go 3000 or 4000 miles and we have an intercontinental drone, right? host: that would be the case. we will go to gary from orangeville, california. on the line for democrats. good morning. caller: good morning. i would like to make a brief atments about the shooting the baseball practice a couple days ago. that there has been very little said about the shooter. as far as i can tell he was a radical, kind of a guy that was fedthat up with stuff. i think there should be more commentary on that. i mean, this was almost predictable. they are trying to take away our only national hea

my son, steve called me on sunday morning, he was working at hattiesburg for a friend of ours.said, what you think, pops? it's the 66-65 will win. that number i had in mind. all of those things happened, and i really wasn't prepared to win the masters in 1986. i prepared life that had the previous four or five years, but my career was basically over a 1980. i played golf because i enjoyed it come i want to do part of the scene, thought i could have a lightning and a bottle, i get landing in a bottle one time in '86. >> bret: in 1998, you had a great run. you finished 500. >> i finished in sixth place, the 15th railway, the exact same position i did in '86. my son steve was on the bank that time. i said, i have been here before, if i finish the same way, i will win the tournament. >> bret: not to touch too much politics, but i am from d.c. presidents have played golf, a lot of them. eisenhower played a ton, you go down the line. now, our current president is a golfer. what do you think of the environment today? >> i don't like it. i am pretty conservative. i was not an obama fan

host: hattiesburg, minnesota john is a democrat. caller: good morning. i wanted to swing back to the infrastructure issue. i have a comment for ms. roscoe and singer. i saw an article in the "washington post" within the rast several days about trump's infrastructure plan. it's very different from i think what people expect. my request my guest, they would try to educate the public how the system works. typically the way it's done now we pay taxes when we buy gasoline, that money goes into a highway trust fund. when roads and bridges need to be built, the federal government finances 90% and the states finance 10%. it's put out for bid by the states and private contractors build the projects. trump is planning on flipping that. i live in a state that wouldn't be able to afford infrastructure. he's talking about what's called privateer -- private public partnerships. that's privatizing the contracting system, which is going to create quite an increase in user costs. you will pay tolls to ride on the roadways. you will pay someone to clean your water, your w

of care was here was that because of the abilities -- what is the difference between waterloo at hattiesburg -- and gettysburg? railroads there is no that waterloo to there is -- waterloo there is no railroads or the ability to sustain an army. it is much more difficult for the french to reconstitute their army. the panic spread. civil war armies were better supply, and in some respects were more resilient because of the sort of weaponry they had, the logistical system they had to support them, it enabled them to recover from damaging battles. you think about the battle of gettysburg where these armies lose 20,009. how do they continue to function? they continue to function because the system that sustains them is well-developed. >> real quick. battles of annihilation are hard to achieve because the soldiers come from the same citizen soldier tradition. they have the same type of training that makes it harder to achieve an edge on one another. >> i would turn towards what i think is the single best military history of the war, how the north won. the argument is that it is a policy of exhaust