of personal expeence, is that sometimes the press reaches over that very fine line, which you haveescribed, and takes their rights that they have and foets their responsibility to the public and, i think, to the public officials they're covering. and when thecross that line and don't exert responsibility, they start moving in and affecting the ivate lives and the privacy rights of the individual, which jeane has said, where you give up those rights of privacy when you run as a public official. we shouldn't have to. not that i hate the press. frdom of theress is a basic freom in this untry. i think you have a responsibility. along with the right goes that responsibility, and you've got to exercise it. we do exercise it. we don't pnt everything we know. do think about people's privacy times have changed. we didn't used to publish things thatid impinge on public performance of pubc people we did not print the fact that the head of the armed services committee was drunk on the floor of congress. we didn't print that. we now do. we try to confine ourselves to the private iues that affect public