processes, we could obably put e digester and mosofhe activity on a much smalle footpnthan what we havenow, we need toe looki at these of other things. i st learned very recently that auc more effient and quicker processtt would be healier for the community wn 're talkingaut treating the water after it has gone to t digesterwould be using something other than chemicals. if we did hat, it would be loquicker. e would no need as much room. we would trulybe moving towards being state of the art. i to ggest thate digesterask forcehas done its ty for the first up. ste --- ste [tone!] we ne to go bk and have the expertse we evelede put to working on how we do the whole system. ut lso just want to suor al's other suggestion at we need to look at spreading this aroun we d oteed to have of esewage in r neighborhood suisor maxwell: next speaker, plee. >> my name is francisco da costa. ystem -- sewer system provemenprogram. survisoraxwell: kw, it is a hearing on o. >> let me address at. some years o the constituents of san fis paa msure for 2.4 billion. conveniently, t s frcisco puic utilies cmissio w