haveu look at it, they been a threshold nuclear state for a while and they simply haven't gone there because they have gauged, i think appropriately, the reaction, whether it is a military response or increased sanctions. i wouldn't expect iran to try to break out. partly because the position they will ian in 10 or 15 years from now, they haven't lost much. in fact, they can conduct quite a bit of research in the meantime. and in some ways, industrialize their program. so i don't think it is in their interest and died don't think they believe it is either to break out. but i am concerned. that is why i ultimately could not support the agreement. the nonnuclear side and the license that it might give them to behave differently there. charlie: and what do you think might restrict their behavior beyond this nuclear deal? what are the elements you would like to see in american foreign-policy to restrict these activities, whether it is support of hezbollah and using hezbollah as an agent in syria or whatever it might be? what are the tools in american foreign-policy that can change that b