meeting of san francisco ethics commission we'll begin by taking the roll call sxhaerp commissioner hayon all members obey present first is public comment on the appearing or not appearing on the agenda with the simplification. >> i came to talk about a need for responding to complaint both filed with you as well as those referred to the suspect ordinance task force because i'm involved in would bot

meeting of san francisco ethics commission we'll begin by taking the roll call sxhaerp commissioner hayon all members obey present first is public comment on the appearing or not appearing on the agenda with the simplification. >> i came to talk about a need for responding to complaint both filed with you as well as those referred to the suspect ordinance task force because i'm involved in would both aspects of complainant an incident in december of 2013 when i complained about nearly a year ago i've never heard a response nothing not to say we're looking at it it self-come within our jurisdiction silence that's a problem because what i was on the commission about mike dparz we talked about whether complaints what about stale so the fact i've not heard makes me wonder maybe i h had a valid point but want to talk about the complaints referred to the shoerns task force i've had complaint where i got a unanimous or overwhelming vote sometimes i'd get a response you don't think this would hundred thousand dollar hold up in court i spent time on the task force envelope was there a draft of min

towards greater transcripts this was something the commission took up in july of 2013 where commissioner hayon was the commissioner president but the civil grand jury endorsed this step in june of 2014 i was a member of that jury and when the commissioner heard the civil grand jury report they wanted to take into account it but foster down the calendar of things you have on our plate we're urging it be moved you have indian from talking with the city attorney's office to have until july 30th 3 full commission meetings to thrush out the problems that meetings needs to be addressed in terms of the legal language we implemented a poll inch provided to the commissioners and the world and the purpose of the poll was the commission raised the question of whether or not there's a public sentiment for action on varies or various items there's an action to disclose the influence of money on city hall and there's at this point, a approval rating if the public the ethics commission work on that as you recall as voters get to the congress that's not a high rating so thank you. >> i note that friends of et

. >> well, i share in commissioner hayons decision we're going a little bit in circle i feel like here we are and this is where i say we could do better with engaging with our partners whether the referral process where the particular complaints come before us from the sunshine task force or bystander down or standing aside and kind of passively watching something heap and could have played a better role or monitored it so whatever developments that happen or had troofrpd would be brought back to the commission for deliberations it is frustrating but a bidding bit of a what end to me it feels like a forfeiture direction that has a statute of limitations issue potentially it feels like this was a possible way in which we could august violations fine to the $10,000 i want to as a commission to be clear where we're headed and ultimately trying to achieve we are doing the right thing by having this discussion every time we become more clearer but i want to be as clear as we can to what at the end the component we can do our absolutely best to achieve but outcome ifeven if we end up being t