algunos temen que otros imiten el ejemplo de hazleton.c> "cuando los estados individuales empiezan a lidiar con estos temas, nos encontramos en situaciones que son muy preocupantes. porque no les compete, porque tratan de solucionar temas que no estan preparados ni habilitados para hacerlo. " este miembro de la comision nacional de derechos civiles no esta de acuerdo con el fallo. pienso personalmente como empresario y abogado que la decision de la corte suprema pidiendoles a la corte del tercer distrito que revisen esta decision no es 1 buena decision de la corte suprema. este abogado cita que estados como el suyo, georgia, ya han imitado leyes como esta. ante la falta de reforma migratoria es 1 hecho que vamos a ver cada vez mas este tipo de medidas. en 1 comunicado, lou barnetta, ahora congresista y ex alcalde de hazleton que impulso la ordenanza hace 5 anos indico que es 1 gran victoria. partidarios de la ordenanza creen que es 1 ejemplo nacional. sabemos que otras localidades

just this week, the supreme court sent back a circuit court of appeals ruling that had been against hazleton, pa., same kind of thing. of course, we will see a lot more, but i think the trend of the supreme court is good toward enforcement. host: should this be done on the state level or the federal level? guest: we have always advocated for a national mandatory e- verify system. but congress has resisted doing that for 15 years. it is great that the states are doing it. for the most part, and immigration is a federal issue. but it does make sense for states and localities to help the federal government. there's a 287 g program, which the federal government has where local governments can train and help immigration agents. we do not need 50 different state immigration enforcement systems. but it does make sense for the states to help the feds. host: howard joined does come i republican caller from richmond, virginia. good morning. caller: i have a question about -- i'm sorry, barack obama -- host: let's move on to margaret. caller: i am a democrat and the liberal and i have tried to bring it

just this week, the supreme court sent back a circuit court of appeals ruling that had been against hazleton, pa., same kind of thing. of course, we will see a lot more, but i think the trend of the supreme court is good toward enforcement. host: should this be done on the state level or the federal level? guest: we have always advocated for a national mandatory e- verify system. but congress has resisted doing that for 15 years. it is great that the states are doing it. for the most part, and immigration is a federal issue. but it does make sense for states and localities to help the federal government. there's a 287 g program, which the federal government has where local governments can train and help immigration agents. we do not need 50 different state immigration enforcement systems. but it does make sense for the states to help the feds. host: howard joined does come i republican caller from richmond, virginia. good morning. caller: i have a question about -- i'm sorry, barack obama -- host: let's move on to margaret. caller: i am a democrat and the liberal and i have tried to bring it