why do we actually question my son he retic to you but why do we actually want more women in boardrooms is there any evidence that companies actually make more money if more women are in charge yes that is so we we know about today that makes teams perform better there is for example a big survived from the peterson institute in washington that showed that it was worldwide study shows that there is a clear connection between the share of women in top management and profitability. why do german companies don't understand that i mean if there is sign is. more women in boardrooms and. money for the company why do german companies why don't they understand that's a good question. i think it's most comfortable from fame. they have been doing very well for the caves they're quite satisfied with themselves the target companies don't see the need to adapt to a changing world as much as other countries like sweden are the u.s. to. do you think that is one of the main problems is this effect that you've described earlier the fact that men just recruit men is that yes they do and as long as the c.

he was a very reticent, shut his friend david davis described him and he was like that on personal matters and he was like that on matters, and he certainly was like that on reconstruction. like to bind himself too securely to what might turn millstone. he wanted to be free to xperiment, and he did try to experiment with various

when i talked to mitch mcconnell in the senate, he was reticent about it but that it would only providehance for joe manchin to vote for it and improve their election chances. so it's my read that it's a nonstarter for him in the senate. what do you think? >> it may be a nonstarter for the leader in the senate. but that is a poor call and not to suggest that i'm leading the senate because we're not. i can tell you what the american people believe and what your viewers believe, we need to make these tax cuts permanent. so listen, the american people are smarter than that. they know if joe manchin is doing a cover vote, only gets to 59 votes in the senate, they see that. so let's be serious about making these permanent. i can tell you, we're going to push for that here in the house. there will be a vote on making those tax cuts permanent ands will -- >> neil: has speaker ryan told you that? >> the speaker has told us that. we've reminded him of that commitment. i believe he will be good at that commitment. >> neil: you have a way of constantly reminding people of that commitment. we'll se

so from my perspective, nowa days he's more reticent to talk about this than in may of 2016 end cameback to kurt bell in late july of 2016 and remind him the e-mails were in the hands of the national security agency. so maybe what he's saying now isn't what he said two years ago and you're right it bothered me for two years but what has to happen here i believe is that this investigation that the president asked for and received at the department of justice, where they're going to look into what kind of approaches came from the law enforcement and national security arena to the trump campaign, i would like to talk to them. i think that government contractor should talk to them as well. let's see how he recalls things when he is sitting at doj. >> so michael, you made a reference to a second approach. is that something you are prepared to talk about right now or no? >> no, i'm not. and again, i'm thanking god that the president has called for this investigation and the doj agreed to do so because i would love to talk about that second approach. i would -- i got to tell you, it is some

he was a very reticent, shut his friend david davis described him and he was like that on personal matters and he was like that on matters, and he certainly was like that on reconstruction. like to bind himself too securely to what might turn millstone. he wanted to be free to xperiment, and he did try to experiment with various approaches, to reintegrating the the ern states back into union. he tried that in north carolina. he tried it in arkansas. in louisiana. actually, setting up governments. > actually setting up renewed governments there. that would agree to eliminate to ery, and move forward reintegrating these states into the union. cases, n most of those proffer on became a the personalities he had to rely upon which were not always sterling personalities. for example, ina, union forces occupied the outer banks of north carolina early in war. pushed inland, and thought they conquered enough north carolina territory to justify unionist state government. well, to that position, as union y governor of this state government lincoln appoints -- stanley. a mistake. stanley turns out to

he is uncharacteristly reticent. how important is his personal response to this? >> really important. i think people in washington are going to hi this message is directed at us. if i was washington, i'd step back and say we've been at negotiation frs decades. we've seen them reverse course. this is partly north korean messaging to an internal audience to kim jong-un saying i'm not going to roll over. if i were the president, even if we delay the summit, we have an historic opportunity here. leets look tat big gain here. the potential for peace in the korean peninsula and let this other stuff about complaints by kim jong-un roll by the wayside. i wouldn't pay that much attention to this. >> if he stays quiet. there's a big if on that. jean, the president has bragged. when you hear the noble prize being chanted, he loves that. likes to talk about it. he has bragged that he is going to do something every administration has failed to do when it comes to north korea. he cares about ta badge. here he is. >> a lot of, this should have been handled, by the way, over the

he's kind of a reticent character who didn't keep a diary that used to he will back and said to her look, i'll bring you back with me to try to alleviate some of her anger. she says that he will never say, you know, i'm bitter about not having to be her but she will say on his behalf i can't believe we're still here. i can't believe they're doing this to george. >> she was obviously angry a a treatment for calling in the first place. marshall didn't write a memoir. despite publishers offering him huge sums of money to do it, he didn't do it. he declined even to keep detailed personal records during the war, which i found kind of stunning. talk about why you make these decisions and then talk about the challenge that posed for you writing this book when your protagonist natalie didn't leave much of a record, but refused to create much . >> right. so marshall i think rightly looked around at his colleagues and fellow officers and fellow diplomats who are writing, keeping diaries of writing memoirs and said this is entirely self-serving pick you are trying to craft the historical record in

well known and he's very euro skeptic now so the motto sylvie was saying that he must get his choice in the known reticence of president was that. mr sevan or had been outspoken in suggesting that italy should leave the euro currency saying that it was a doomed project and that according to president in the last half hour he has actually addressed why that wouldn't have worked he's saying he didn't block the formation of a government but he clearly has drawn a red line saying that mr saval no would have spooked the markets even further there's been a lot of turmoil of uncertainty since the election in march of course and he was suggesting that somebody like mrs of owner in such a strong position in one of the largest economies really would have rattled people in brussels in the financial centers around the concert material salvini has come out just in the last half an hour and said well doesn't not prove what's the point of having elections if it's the markets that decide on the personnel and many of his voters will agree of course many people who didn't vote for the so-called populist coalition will be re

he did. so this speaks to her reticence about this.ines it is very, very clear what she thinks about what the white house has done here, and it's very clear that she's concerned about the long-term impact on the department of justice and the fbi. >> just as we, seeing president trump's attorney in the investigation, emmitt flood, attend at least the beginning of two classified briefings involving the investigation into russia's involvement with the president's campaign or potential involvement. a number of lawmakers reportedly saw flood's appearance there as inappropriate, at least a republican staffer told cnn, quote, it's the craziest bleep i have ever heard. do you think, david, flood should have been at these meetings? >> no. i think this was an effort to try and send a message to wray, to rosenstein that the white house is going to use its weight to compel them to turn over to congress the things that congress wants. and it was inappropriate. and obviously, the issues at hand here affect the president. he is part of this probe. an

he should be impeached. i'm with the 70%. i understand the reticence of my colleagues and the democratic leadership who say don't feed the notion that is being presented by the republicans that say that all they want to do is impeach the president because they're mad about the fact they lost the election. i get that, and i understand why that would cause them to not want to talk about it. but i just don't have those -- at some point in time, we have to deal with reality. we have to deal with some truths. and we have to deal with some facts. i know that people are saying we've got wait and we've got see what our special counsel will come up with. i get that. and i believe that we need facts in order to move forward. but the discussion must take place. we must not allow the president of the united states of america who has this is relationship with the country who hates us and has undermined us and who has undermined our democracy to not be talked about, to not be discussed, to not be talked about the reticence of our members to deal with it. i just will

reticence to apologize. >> this comes long before -- during the campaign i asked him multiple times. he doesn't ask for forgiveness of god which he has talked about multiple times even though he's been embraced by the evangelical community. i asked him when was the last time he apologized during the campaign. he couldn't remember. there was the "access hollywood" thing. to say this is a reaction to something he discovered in the white house, this is a lifelong thing. >> anderson, there are about three dozen times most of us would have thought during the campaign it would have served his interest to apologize. >> i don't disagree. >> people ran in and said, mr. trump, you need to apologize for this, and he didn't. it worked for him. >> he's unconcerned with what the right thing is. apparently it works for him to never apologize after attacking a war hero. >> his weakness -- >> let's say in fairness to kelly sadler, she did apologize to meghan mccain. i think what's coming from the top, she can't do it publicly. >> she did say she would do it publicly. >> then there could have been someon

he was scared of specifically addressing it. iam scared of specifically addressing it. i am sure the reason for my teacher's reticencee promotion of homosexuality in schools. section 28 was enacted that yea rs schools. section 28 was enacted that years ago in a climate that was very different for lg bt years ago in a climate that was very different for lgbt people. years ago in a climate that was very different for lgbt peoplelj obviously don't want children taught that the gay and lesbian lifestyle is natural and normal, it is not, never has been and never will be. back then, you could be fired for being gay and homophobic headlines we re being gay and homophobic headlines were at daily occurrence and gay people were betrayed as a menace to society. 75% of the british public thought homosexuality was wrong.|j hate to use the word perversion, but let's face up to the truth of this situation, that is what it is. despite mass protests and the campaign of civil disobedience, section 28 became law in 1988. children need to be taught traditional moral valuables are being taught the inalienable right to be gay. supporters

sent there to spy, reporting back what he or she was spying upon to masters who are in -- well, they are called spy masters, are they know? why is there such a reticence world is chuck schumer so comfortable giving direction to the complicit left-wing national media. shouldn't there be a little veil between himself and the so-called independent press? >> remember, schumer is the man who said you mess with the intelligence community, they have sing ways from sunday of getting back at you. lou: right. >> he's well versed in these things. but here again -- lou: well-versed or well-informed. >> could be. i have no problem with using the word spy. but informant is a good word too. the whole thing was this person clearly contacted members of the trump campaign on behalf of the fbi, was reporting back, seemed to be talking to some members as a way to get to other members, then bringing up the whole question of hillary clinton's deleted e-mails. was he planting information in this is really serious stuff and it's very difficult to find out what's going on. lou: it is serious. but it is also revealing in all sorts of ways, the discussion between informant and

president obama has been notably reticent, okay, when all of this stuff has been happening with president trump. so many people say, where is obama? how does heat is he thinking? now here is this book that explains, you know, just how confused he was and what role he thinks he played and did he push people too far and this was the natural boomerang after that. >> i'm eager to read the rest of the book if only pause we haven't had a lot of access to former president obama since he left the white house. he really stepped off the stage and beyond that. and it's hard to remember a time. there was once a time when a white house where we weren't hearing about every single fight, 6th interaction. largely what he was saying in his eight years of the presidency remained private. this is providing insight into his private conversations, his private thoughts, his int introspection. how does he see himself? >> what does the trump election mean about obama's legacy. there was donald trump, hillary clinton. but there really was barack obama here. and you can hear the forme president trying to process the decision that america made in the 2016 election. one

he expected. but because you don't know exactly what china will end up buying or how this deal would potentially pan out, i think the administration is reticent to actually make a commitment on the record. perhaps they didn't get one from china either. >> we've got to know, as far as these negotiations go, those working on this, on china's side, have a lot more experience and have got a lot more runway. xi jinping, he's going to be in power forever. d kayla, this is pretty stunning. the market already up 262 on the day. but remember, they are responding, the market is up because it seems the tariffs are off and it was trump who decided to put them on to begin with. one thing he gave this market, certainly volatility. >>> coming up, unemployment is low. here's a question. why aren't recent college grads, why are they having a tough time finding a good paying job? >>> but first, last week marked one year since the start of special counsel robert mueller's investigation. on the season finale of "saturday night live," they were surprised by the president's reaction to the occasion. >> thursday marked the one-year anniversary of the start of rober