heard? answer, yes. question, due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr. depp, answer, yes. do you find that mr. depp has proven by clear and convincing evidence that ms. heard acted with actual malice, answer, yes. 2, as to the statement appearing in the op-ed entitled, a transformative moment for women in the "washington post" print edition and the online op-ed amber heard, i spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath, that has to change. in the "washington post" online edition, quote, then two years ago i became a public figure representing domestic abuse and i felt the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out, end quote. do you find that mr. depp has proven all the elements of defamation. answer, yes. has mr. depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question the statement was made or published by ms. heard. answer, yes. question, the statement was about mr.

heard.lions of people are watching on tiktok. some said a jury by tiktok. # #justice for johnny have had billions of support on that platform, whereas for amber heard, not so many. both have received countless abusive threats, death threats, it has gotten series in terms of the hatred toward both of them from both side. so a six-week trial almost over, you heard the judge informing the jury to now decide how much in damages, because they have not wrote that down in their forms. th is telling, we don't know what side it will go, but either side could be dismissed. we don't know that. in terms of international attention, the court case is televised around the world, and i think a lot of people, some say they could not get enough of it. journalistically, factually, this is a case about them both accusing each other of ruining their careers and ultimately it has played out in court. hearing details about that marriage that ended, who assaulted who, who abused who, vice versa. very public case. m

that was miss heard's fist.'s former therapist, laurelanderson, described a dynamic of reciprocal abuse. he had had been well controlled, i think, i for almost, i don't i know, 20—30 years. and both were victims . of abuse in their homes. but i thought he had been well controlled for decades. - and then with ms heard, l he was triggered and they and then with ms heard, - he was triggered and they engaged in what i saw as mutual abuse. sometimes i'm not sure. i know she led on more than one . occasion and started it to keep him with her because abandonment and having him leave _ was her worst nightmare. and i think he may have initiated it on occasions to that. _ and i think he may have initiated it on occasions, too. _ that, i'm less sure of. their dynamic and this diagnosis ignited debate about the nature of domestic violence. the term mutual abuse is not something we operate from. and in fact, i quite frankly don't believe in the term. i think that what you see when there is domestic violence in a relationship

heard: i spoke up against sexual violence — heard: i spoke up against sexual violence and _ heard: iinst sexual violence and face our culture'sl violence and face our culture's wrath" — violence and face our culture's wrath" in — violence and face our culture's wrath" in the _ violence and face our culture's wrath" in the washington - violence and face our culture's wrath" in the washington postl violence and face our culture's- wrath" in the washington post online edition, _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke up _ wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke up against - wrath" in the washington post online edition, "i spoke up against sexual. edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence _ edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and — edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and face _ edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and face our _ edition, "i spoke up against sexual violence and face our culture's - violence and face our cul

and not for amber heard.nd there are a lot of people who are advocates for victims of domestic violence who are going to be concerned about that. that a number of folks have said how surprising that is in this era of me too in how she didn't get much sympathy at all in social media throughout this thing and whether that will send a chilling message to other victims of domestic violence. who what be hesitant to come forward. there is that to see. but the bottom line is here that people outside the courthouse are satisfied that johnny depp won in their eyes even if amber heard did get some measure of victory in one of they are three claims. >> we're just getting a statement from amber heard. let me read this in real time. the disappointment i feel is beyond words. i'm heart broken that the amount of evidence was not enough to stand up to the power, influence and sway of my ex-husband. i'm even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women. it is a setback. it sets back the clock to a time when

heard. one, as to the statement of appearing in the online op-ed entitled amber heard, i spoke up against sexual violence and faced our cultures wrath, that has to change." in "the washington post" online edition. "i spoke up against sexual violence and faced our culture's wrath. that has to change." do you find that mr. depp has proven all the elements of defamation? answer, yes. has mr. depp proven by a greater weight of the evidence that question, the statement was made or published by mrs. heard? yes. the question. the statement was about mr. depp. answer: yes. question: the statement was false? answer: yes. question: the statement last a defamatory implication about mr. depp. answer: yes. question. the defamatory implication was designed and intended by mrs. heard. answer: yes. question: due to circumstances surrounding the publication of the statement, it conveyed a defamatory implication to someone who saw it other than mr. depp. answer: yes. do you find that mr. depp has proven by cl

en menor medida amber heard recibiÓ apoyo en redes sociales.loide britÁnico por difamaciÓn, despuÉs de que un artÍculo lo demandarÁ como golpeador de mujeres. determino que en johnny depp abusÓ fÍsicamente de johnny depp en al menos en dos ocasiones. sin embargo, a quien estados unidos parece que fue heard y no johnny depp le maltratador en su matrimonio, asentando prÁcticamente las mismas pruebas, esto es lo que decÍa esta maÑana su abogado. borja: me gustarÍa preguntarte algo, tÚ crees que entonces este revuelo mediÁtico que ha habido, donde la mayorÍa de las personas en redes sociales del prÍncipe san con johnny depp, ha podido influir en el veredicto? reportera: la abogada pide esta maÑana que no vieran las redes sociales, hubo incluso receso de 10 dÍas, y el jurado son personas que van a su casa, hablan con sus familiares, y que tambiÉn pueden mirar las redes sociales. borja: gracias. por esto estaremos muy pendientes de la apelaciÓn de amber heard. es un tema controversial, por eso te preguntamos en redes sociales: ¿estas de acuerdo con e

amber heard did of— react. and they knew that. amber heard did of course _ react.er heard did of course when part - react. and they knew that. amber heard did of course when part of i react. and they knew that. amber i heard did of course when part of her libel case and yes, public perception has seemed to be all about viewing this as a victory, perhaps that is the wrong word, for johnny depp, why do you think that is? ,, ., ., , johnny depp, why do you think that is? ,, ., , ., , is? several reasons. i advised la ers is? several reasons. i advised lawyers and — is? several reasons. i advised lawyers and celebrities, - is? several reasons. i advised lawyers and celebrities, you l is? several reasons. i advised i lawyers and celebrities, you have is? several reasons. i advised - lawyers and celebrities, you have to not only win in the court room, you have to win in the court of public opinion. and what we seemed to see was a disconnect between amber heard's pr team and her legal team. her legal team was fighting in the court room, but they were not fighting to win i

one woman i also spoke to was here for amber heard.with amber heard." and it had messages on it from lots of amber heard supporters. and she said to me that she was worried that would be the verdict and she felt angry that, despite all the evidence that was shown, that it was ruled against amber heard, and she was worried about what sort of precedent it would set. amber heard was inside court — we saw that, because, obviously, this was being televised — whilst johnny depp was not here. he's somewhere in the uk. his legal team were here and they released a short statement afterwards. but this is very much a resounding victory forjohnny depp. yeah, a resounding victory, as you point out, forjohnny depp, but also a sort of a trial by tiktok for particularly amber heard, given some of the vitriol that she's described in david's reporting there. if social media had been thejury, johnny depp would have been cleared a long time ago, probably even ahead of the trial, to be honest with you. the support for him has been pretty overwhelming on th

heard countersuing for $100 million. the jury's verdict, a major win for depp, who was absent in court. performing in london. his team said he had a previously scheduled work commitment. but inside the courtroom, heard sat stoically. the jury awarded her $2 million damage, siding with her claim that depp's lawyer defamed her when he called her allegations a hoax. >> do you find ms. heard has proven all the elements of defamation? answer, yes. >> reporter: during the six-week trial, a litany of lurid details coming out in court. both heard and depp taking to the stand accusing the other of abuse. >> there was the physical abuse, which was a constant. there was quite a lot of verbal abuse. >> reporter: depp denying he ever hit heard. >> never did i, myself, reach the point of striking ms. heard in any way. >> reporter: heard accusing depp of physical and sexual abuse, >> my head was bashing against the back of the bar and i couldn't breathe. i've never been so scared in my life. >> reporter: depps attorneying using audio t

the one here, getting $50 million in damages, heard getting $2 million -- $15 million in damages, heardetting $2 million the discrepancy? >> i think it is very hard to understand how the verdict found that heard's op-ed she published in the washington post was made with actual malice. because she wrote an op-ed that didn't mention him. it merely alluded to having sought the order of protection and what consequences she experienced after she saw that -- sought that. she had lawyers carefully review the statement. it's very hard to see how that meets the high bar for defamation of a public figure. but i can say that accused perpetrators are more and more turning to defamation cases, as a way to address allegations of sexual and domestic violence, and that is also a worrisome development that could prevent victims from coming forward. kristen: that's a good point you bring up -- a much higher bar for defamation for a public figure versus a private person. how much the johnny depp's star power play a role in this trial? >> it's very hard to say. there are many things that i think about this

the jury found ms heard acted with "actual malice".ng fuel to the fire with the move. the weapons, which have been described as game changers, have a longer range than russia's. police in the us city of tulsa in oklahoma say four people have been killed in a shooting in a hospital campus. the gunman is also dead.

and what she heard second hand. this was not a trial, we keep pointing out. it's not an impeachment, but it's interesting in terms of how we weigh her credibility. >> you will hear people complain, probably on the right, that a lot of this is here say. it's hutchinson reporting to her what was told to her by someone else. it's true here say is often excluded, but it has so many exceptions. there are so many holes in the rule. so many that could scarcely be said to be a rule anymore. but the reality is we're not in court and sometimes here say is totally reliable and that's why we have so many exceptions to the rule. some of this may be reliable. you look at the source itself and if that source is checkable, verifiable, it's not going to be discarded. here, you should take it for what it's worth. >> thank you. let me go to ali who's outside the hearing room. i've got wonder what you were seeing inside the room. the reaction to some of the bombshells she dropped, describing this picture of a president lunging for his

of striking miss heard in any way. >> reporter: heard accusing depp of physical and sexual abuse. >>head was bashing against the back of the bar, and i couldn't breathe. i've never been so scared in my life. >> reporter: depp's attorneys using audio they said showed heard admitting to starting a fight. >> i'm sorry i hit you like this, but i did not punch you. i did not [ bleep ] deck you. i [ bleep ] was hitting you. >> reporter: heard's attorneys showing video she secrety recorded of depp becoming violent in his kitchen, breaking his own cabinets and berating heard. tonight, heard calling the verdict a setback, saying it sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly shamed and humiliated and sets back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously. but outside the courthouse, cheers when the jury ruled in depp's favor. depp posting to instagram saying, the jury gave me my life back, i am truly humbled. >> our thanks to kenneth. >>> now we turn to news of yet another horrific shooting in america tonight. at least five people a

yes, i am the king today, almost nothing is heard about the actor.tinues to act in films. but now it 's only one film a year, and these are far from the main roles, although before there was much more work that was done here. in general, they came here to relax, relax, relax at home. let's go. on the wave of movement, the meta amber heard again filed voice in an interview with the washington post, she called the depot, a public personal, representing the problem of domestic violence, the actress said that joni during their marriage was jealous of her colleagues, beat her up, dragged her around the house by the hair, choked her, and then asked for forgiveness. you know, it happens to so many women, and when it happens in your own house behind closed doors from someone you love, being a woman who went through this in front of the public. i have a unique opportunity. remind other women that everything should not be the way it is now you do not have to go through this alone you are not alone, and we can change this in the united states and europe, just a

heard in any way.in my life. >> witnesses for both depp and heard gave sometimes emotional testimony about what they saw and the former couple's counsellor testified about their relationship. >> they engaged in what i saw as mutual abuse. >> the jury came to a decision after nearly 14 hours of deliberation. and we have just received a statement from amber heard, and it says, quote, the disappointment i feel today is beyond words. i'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband. i'm even more disappointed with what this verdict means for other women. it is a setback. it sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out should be publicly shamed and humiliated. it sets back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously. and we also have a statement from johnny depp. and he states, quote, from the very beginning, the goal of bringing this case was to reveal the truth, rega

blockbuster trial involving johnny depp and amber heard. the jury finding the actress defamed her ex-husband in a 2018 op-ed on domestic abuse awarding him $15 million in damages and giving her 2 million for her countersuit. how both stars are reacting tonight. >>> the baby formula shortage and the striking acknowledgement from president biden today that he didn't grasp how bad the crisis was until it was too late. >>> the breakthrough treatment for one of the deadliest forms of cancer >>> on the eve of the queen's jubilee, the concerns that she may have to scale back the role in the celebration. >>> this is "nbc nightly news" with lester holt. >>> good evening just breaking tonight, police in tulsa, oklahoma, are investigating a series of shootings at a medical building near a hospital several people are dead and the gunman said to be armed with a rifle is also dead according to police. police responding to a call late this afternoon about shooter in a building near st. francis hospital. >> shots fired we see blood on the ground >> reporte

he married anne burke heard in 2015. filed for divorce the judge sent the jury back to consider the size of the damage after the verdict. the jury then came back with a berdych -- with a verdict that heard defamed johnny depp in that article in "the washington post." let's hear the verdict as it was red in the courtroom in virginia. >> do you find that mr. depp has proven all the elements of defamation? swer, yes. has mr. depp proven by a greater weight of evidence that question , statement was made or published by ms. heard? answer, yes. the statement was about mr. depp? answer, yes. the statement was false? answer, yes. mark: our correspondent eric pape has more. good. are there any more accusations you can ing to us? eric: plenty of relief among johnny depp fans who have been incredibly supportive, almost an army of support, some big fans and some a little bit creepy in their desire to destroy a woman. so, there has been joy. that has been relief on the amber heard side. i haven't heard that many comments but the most

we hadn't heard from them either .elt out how exactly the impact it has had on them and how we both didn't feel safe. laura: and what is the next hearing that the committee will focus on? reporter: the committee is going to focus more on the pressure that state officials put on donald tru to try and turn the election his way, to try to throughout the legitimate result by president biden. what really stood out for me in today's hearing was that the three officials that we heard from our republicans, and they didn't cave into donald trump, as we heard there in the clip, they swore and all too true the american and state constitutions. the committee is trying to show that the threat hasn't gone away. this time, these individuals did stand up to donald trump and his aides. but there are lots of election deniers now running for office across america. in the future if those sorts of people get into power, will they be able to stand up to someone like donald trump? the committee is trying to show th the events that happened o

depp vs heard guilty. everything, but what is happening in her opinion is carried, and pornography, we are so used to the cynicism in social networks that we consider the trial not as a tragedy. but as a car accident, we abandon critical thinking and replace it with cheap thrills. such scattered consumption does not allow us to understand, for real, instead, we only experience fears, indignation and arousal of feelings of the participants in the process, far from positive, both claim that this court ruined their lives, that you lost as a result the fact that ms. heard brought these charges against you, no less these accusations were instantly talked about all over the world, they claimed that i was supposedly alcoholics. drug addicts beat women for me it was all over as soon as these rumors began to spread. i lost right away. i will live with this for the rest of my life. now, when all this is happening, i cannot build a career, people are afraid to contact me so as not to expose themselves to threats and

we heard from his staffers, we have heard from his staffers about what he thought, about what he had experienced, from their own recounting. we have not heard from vice president pence himself. is the committee going to call the former vice president to testify. and if not, why? >> well simone, as throughout this investigation, we are not going to hone in on the future witnesses. we will call to testify. but we are seeking to find information from everyone, who has relevant information, about the events of that day. and all of the circumstances surrounding it. some of the people you mentioned, mark meadows for example, we have pursued, that and we continue pursue that, through the courts. he has obstructed congress. and we are trying to uphold that subpoena, to compel him to testify. >> congress woman, i have a question, that is similar to the question just asked. and you did not want to answer, i'm going to ask. anyway [laughs] as a two part, or part one. should we expect to hear further testimony or existing testimony from tony ornado, i understand the committee has spoken with. an

what i saw is that women and remember, you heard amber heard, it's a setback for all the women and blahh blah but it was women online who were like johnny depp is okay, johnny depp didn't -- it was like they were fans. it's a moment where reality seems consumed by the image of pirates of the caribbean. kennedy: he brought up something important missing through the need to movement his men and women are equal and women are just as capable as men of lying and hurting their partners. this is the first time people have had an open conversation about that. he says this is a setback for other victims because she herself was the ultimate victim, i think it's a setback because they worried they are going to be portrayed as borderline monster like amber heard. >> i think what was really missing was trials. oozing from justice system as a whole, 99% of cases get let out so people don't get to come before they put the evidence out there and we saw janik depp and amber heard, she didn't have the evidence. she said all the evidence and didn't give her way but the evidence was against you. you look l

—— mr depp, miss heard. the answer is yes. actorjohnny depp wins his multi—million dollar lawsuit against his former wife amber heard. russia accuses the united states of escalating the conflict in ukraine, after president biden promises to send advanced rocket systems to help ukrainian forces. freedom at last — as the lockdown in shanghai ends after 65 days, there are celebrations on the streets. applause and ukrainian soldiers in kyiv celebrate their country's 3—1 victory over scotland in the world cup playoffs. live from our studio in singapore, this is bbc news. it's newsday. welcome to bbc news, broadcasting to viewers in the uk and around the world. it's 6am in the morning in singapore and 6pm in the evening in virginia in the us, where a jury has found that the actress amber heard defamed her ex—husband johnny depp, after a six—week trial that has transfixed america and people around the world. the two hollywood stars have traded accusations of physical abuse, mental distress and given audiences an inside look into the

we finally heard of donald trump's involvement in this scheme, direct involvement, and we heard this from the republican national committee chairwoman, ronna mcdaniel. she testified about that call in which donald trump was involved. i want to play that for our viewers. >> he turned the call over to mr. eastman, who then proceeded to talk about the importance of the rnc helping the campaign gather these contingent electors in case any of the legal challenges that were ongoing changed the result of any of the states. i think more just helping them reach out and assemble them, but my understanding is the campaign did take the lead and we just were helping them in that role. >> what is the significance, if any, of the fact that trump initiated that call with the rnc chair? >> well, look, he was initiating that call to give his support, his weight behind what was being asked of this head of the republican national committee. likewise, this is why he's on the call with rudy giuliani to the arizona speaker of the hus of representatives. because this is donald trump's request that the speak

tonight, amber heard has said she is disappointed beyond words.he programme: long queues continue at heathrow, with more cancellations. the government warns the aviation industry there can't be a repeat this summer. and ukraine beat scotland, taking them a step closer to a place at the world cup finals. and i'm here at buckingham palace, where major preparations have been under way for a four—day celebration of the queen's platinum jubilee. during the day, crowds gathered on the mall, including a group of stalwarts camping on the pavement, determined to get a good view of the royal events. and coming up on the bbc news channel, a new captain and a new coach. but have high prices put off cricket fans from watching england's rebooted test team? good evening. the actorjohnny depp has won his multimillion—pound libel case against his former wife amber heard. he took her to court over an article in the washington post in 2018, in which she said she'd been the victim of abuse during their 15—month marriage. the jury awarded johnny depp $15 million in da

heard acted with actual malice? answer, yes. >> the jury finding both were defamed, but the jury sided with depp on all three of his defamation claims stemming from heard's "washington post" op-ed in 2018, in which she claimed to be an abuse victim. the jury awarded depp $15 million in compensatory and punitive damages, a total brought down to $10.3 million due to a state law capping punitive damages. depp reacting saying, "the jury gave me my life back. i am truly humbled." but the jury found a statement from depp's former attorney calling the abuse allegations a hoax was defamatory as well and awarded heard $2 million in damages, still far short of what they awarded depp. >> definitely clears johnny's name not only in the court of public opinion but now by a jury. >> heard responding it sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be humiliated. >> i believe it sets women back and will have a chilling effect on women feeling as if they can come forward and bring a claim against or ev

. >>> our exclusive one on one with amber heard after the jury sided with ex-husband johnny depp. does she still stand by her testimony the message she says the verdict sends to women and what she deeply regrets >>> after a year away from the courts, serena williams announcing her comeback >>> and a picture a day for 25 years a life in photos, inspiring america. >> announcer: this is "nbc nightly news" with lester holt >>> good evening, everyone forecasters are using terms like "heat dome" and "atmospheric rivers" to describe what is driving extreme weather conditions across the country tonight, from dangerous rain and flooding to crippling heat many will see triple-digit highs in fact over the course of the next seven days, over 250 million americans can expect temperatures 90 or hotter. and while drought-stricken parts of the west can't seem to buy a drop of rain, too much of it has fallen in montana and wyoming. it's been wiping out bridges, roads, and literally carrying houses away. yellowstone park closed tonight a crushing start to the park's busy vacation season. from torna

we heard from his staffers, we have heard from his staffers about what he thought, about what he had experienced, from their own recounting. we have not heard from vice president pence himself. is the committee going to call the former vice president to testify. and if not, why? >> well simone, as throughout this investigation, we are not going to hone in on the future witnesses. we will call to testify. but we are seeking to find information from everyone, who has relevant information, about the events of that day. and all of the circumstances surrounding it. some of the people you mentioned, mark meadows for example, we have pursued, that and we continue pursue that, through the courts. he has obstructed congress. and we are trying to uphold that subpoena, to compel him to testify. >> congress woman, i have a question, that is similar to the question just asked. and you did not want to answer, i'm going to ask. anyway [laughs] as a two part, or part one. should we expect to hear further testimony or existing testimony from tony ornado, i understand the committee has spoken with. an

we heard about the abuse claims that amber heard leveled against johnny depp. of them saying she was the one responsible for much of thing aer and frustration and issues in the marriage, and she insisted she would not have gone out with the op-ed in 2018 if she didn't think the claims were true and didn't have a reason to speak up. we talked also about the social media aspect of this, even amber heard has said she felt she was being harassed online, even as the trial was ongoing, people were ready to pick on her from all over the world, from behind their keyboards and she felt this was also something that needed to be said, that people needed to know what was happening in terms of harassment from fans on eat side of this case from that matter. we also have to talk here about the suit itself. you mentioned the $50 million lawsuit that johnny depp filed and the counterclaim, $100 million counterclaim. a lot of the money, it's huge to all of us, unthinkable amount of money. but what the clients are saying here is that they believe because of their own careers, the

heard can still appeal this case and many legal experts believe she will do just that.avannah >> miguel almaguer leading us off, thank you. the case was watched closely by those who have experienced domestic abuse and their advocates. what could today's verdict mean for the world? anne thompson with that part of the story. >> reporter: the world watched as the jury found johnny depp and amber heard were both defamed, but there is no question who the panel sided with >> amber heard was not a good witness and juries react to that. >> reporter: women's rights attorney nancy erika smith calls the verdict reasoned while a defeat for one woman she says it is not a defeat for all women. some say this verdict marks the end of the me too movement. do you agree >> not at all. i think me too is here to stay. i don't think women should be afraid we have to tolerate the harassment and abuse we tolerated for centuries. >> reporter: depp and heard are two privileged celebrities with high-powered legal and pr teams unlike most cases with accusations of domestic abuse is there anything

milley heard that, that trump was helping out and milley testified he heard that and said that's politicalthat. i'm going to focus on what the vice president is talking to me about which is national security. >> trump was leaning on the justice department. richard donahue said the idea was crazy. you heard bill barr saying three times he told trump three times we looked into in, there's no there there. these are all people appointed by donald trump or who worked for donald trump. the u.s. attorney in georgia, bill barr called him and said the president is hearing they brought votes in and they brought in fake votes. he says he looked into that and said no, that was a locked box. when they suspended the count, they locked up the ballot. they were preparing to leave the room, but they took the suitcase out and opened it. >> go back one second. bjay pak said that. we heard testimony from donahue and barr, talking about specific lies about the election. and debunking them, explaining each one of them, taking them seriously, explaining why they were false, and then the testimony from one of the

you have heard about ironing out the i have heard about ironing out the details _ have heard about ironing _ have heard about ironing out the details of the new— have heard about ironing out the details of the new force - have heard about ironing out the details of the new force model. have heard about ironing out the . details of the new force model and that includes— details of the new force model and that includes the _ details of the new force model and that includes the question - details of the new force model and that includes the question of - that includes the question of permanent— that includes the question of permanent basing. - that includes the question of permanent basing. i- that includes the question of permanent basing. i am - that includes the question of - permanent basing. i am wondering putin— permanent basing. i am wondering putin has— permanent basing. i am wondering putin has said _ permanent basing. i am wondering putin has said finland _ permanent basing. i am wondering putin has said finland and - permanent basing. i am wonderingl putin has said finland and swed

i've heard from men who have been abusive, i've heard from women who were survivors.rom people who say she's hurting survivors, there's a lot of things out, there it's time for us to have that complex conversation about domestic violence, i was hoping that's with this trial would mean. >> that's what we're, doing we are talking, liz, blank katie fang, you both make us smarter every time you are here. coming up, how russia is responding to the news that the u.s. is sending long-range missiles to the ukraine, will ask ambassador michael mcfaul if this is enough to stop putin from gaining ground, when the 11th hour continues. do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy - even a term policy - for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have $100,000 or more of life insurance, you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit coventrydirect.com to find

and we heard from cassidy hutchinson. she's a 26-year-old former top aid to then white house chief of staff mark meadows. i'll play a lot of what she had to stay right now. i think it's important. if you didn't see it or think someone should see it, call them and let them know. we're playing it for you. it's important for the country to see. the world to see. listen to every word she had to say. because it's like nothing we have ever heard before about an american president insisting on joining his supporters headed to the capitol, supporters by the way armed with knives, guns, spears, and flag poles. >> i think the last time we talked you mentioned that some of the weapons that people had at the rally included flag poles, oversized sticks or flag poles. bear spray. is there anything else you recall hearing about that the people who gathered had? >> i recall tony and i having a conversation with mark, probably around 10:00 a.m. 10:15 a.m. where i remember tony mentioning knives, guns, in the form of pistols and rifles. be

amber heard lied, not even statements related to the abuse.7 million to charity. she lied about leaking video and tipping off reporters. she exaggerated about her injuries. she testified that she thought johnny depp was going to kill her, that he struck are so many times that she lost count. but in video she presented to the jury in video she presented to the jury and to the world, it did not support an attempted murder orfelony assault, it not support an attempted murder or felony assault, it showed misdemeanour battery. because of those lies and exaggerations you lost credibility with the jurors and they rejected her testimony entirely. huge amounts of money, £2 million has to be paid to her byjohnny depp. she has to pay him $50 million. it is an awful lot of money, do you think this is a case about money or reputation? this case had nothing to do with money. the lawyers for johnny depp didn't ask the jurors to award anything. this was a case of a johnny depp telling his story here in the united states in front of cameras. his lawyers wanted

s. jury sides with the hollywood superstar concluding his ex wife ever heard dufrane to him in an opinion article in which she said she was an abuse victim. ah, i'm gab alphas welcome to the program. russian forces edging closer to capturing a key ukrainian city after days of fighting st. battles on the way and the industrial harp or stevie severe low net in the east and the don bus region. the governor there says that 80 percent of the city is now under russian control, but in a boost for ukraine, germany and the united states, and also additional weapon support. forgive conclude, including advanced rocket systems with a range of up to 80 kilometers. as for him that he w a correspondent, rebecca richard, who is in kia for us. rebecca, what more can you tell us? well, on the, on the battlefield, gerhard, things are moving pretty slowly. we are looking at a war of attrition at the moment. but as you say, russians making as small gains in that case, city in the hands of era than yet, as the governor, they're the governor of that region. now saying that they do, indeed, the russia has now ro

amber heard there is a petition out there to get her taken off the next aqua man film. her stock is way down. i don't think we're going to see her again in a blockbuster film any time soon. david let levitz they have d w culture. thank you. david. for days of celebrations are beginning in the u. k to day to ma queen elizabeth platinum, jubilee. elizabeth has been on the throne for 70 years, longer than any other british monarch before. the ws bigot mass looks now at how people that plan to mark the occasion and what the queen needs to them. for most brits, she's always been part of their lives. queen elizabeth and now she's celebrating her platinum jubilee. 70 years of rule, iraq and there's a determination about let's it to put on the smile on the work clothes go out until she's got to day that she's maintained relations around the world. which i don't think there's any other person in the whole world that has done so well at that point to most brits admire her if not adore her. the ladies at the women's institute of south london certainly do. it's an organization that

>> that was miss heard's fist, amber heard's faced. >> the depp team argue that you were the abuser,ated physical violence. did you? >> i never had to instigate it, i responded to it. when you are living in violence and it becomes normal, as i testified to, you have to adapt, you adopt strategies to cope with it. if it meant, as i testified to, if it meant the difference between a broken nose or a sore cheek, i would do it. >> what about the witnesses who said they have seen you instigate physical violence? they all come in and lie in court? >> i'm less interested in sitting here, you know, relitigating it with you. i'm not here to call any of his witnesses any names, i'm not here to do that. i'm here to talk about it from what it felt like for me as a person, who sat there. >> there was one more voice steps legal team wanted the jury to hear, amber's. they had audio recordings of the couple talking about how amber sometimes got physical. >> don't smack my ear again. cause it resounds in my cranium. would you like that? >> i love. you >> have? >> i love you, i'm sorry. >> and another

now it was heard. the arrival of a mine is mercilessly fired upon by the parties who save love, who moves around the city for more than 10 minutes becomes the target of ukrainian artillery. early colleagues of the tv channel zvezda turned out to be not dangerous. so we can say that the witches got off easy, they flew in one after another, each next one closer and closer to the face, a good work of a spotter, and ukrainian militants were shot in severodonetsk. look like every centimeter. stones are everything and it all came down to him. well, on may 14, residents are already leaving to run away, only out of necessity, for example, for water, but there are those who certainly want to greet the release either from russia and the lc, shouting over the sounds of an endless cannonade, they tell how long ago they ceased to be their own, yes, and people in general for the ukrainian security forces. we are not friends with soldiers. they have instructions. it's like the police said to break the city to turn on

heard guilty of defamation.depp was awarded $50 million in damages. he brought the case after amber heard referred to herself as a public figure representing domestic abuse. the jury found that amber heard was defamed by one of johnny depp's lawyers awarding her $2 million. we have more on the trial. >> mr. foreperso is is the verdict of the jury? reporter: after six weeks in court in six years of angry dispute since they divorced, finely, a judgment by a jury on the allegations that johnny depp had violently assaulted his wife amber heard. was this defamation? the answer? >> yes. >> outside, cheers from awaiting fans, the out come of a trial from allegations that she said were backed up with real proof. there was the video>> what happ? >> the photographs. >> he slapped me across the face. he slapped me again. >> and hours of testimony. >> he just kicked me in the back. was the love of my life. he was, but he was also this other person. [cheers] reporter: for six weeks, johnny depp has arrived at court each day

the jury also ruled that depp owes heard $2 million.sband $8,350,000. her lawyer told the "today" show she absolutely she cannot pay that she believes the trial demonized amber and that the jury was confused. >> the op ed didn't even mention mr. depp by name so what basically they did hear is demonize her, and they did -- they were able to suppress the medical records which were very, very significant because they showed a pattern back going all of the way back to 2012 of amber reporting this to her therapist, for example. >> heard's lawyer said she believes social media also influenced the jury. >> they went home every night. they have families the families are on social media. we have a ten-day break in the middle because of the judicial conference there's no way they couldn't have been influenced by it and it was horrible. it really, really was lopsided >> she said the entire trial was a zoo. nbc's legal analyst danny zavalos is with us thanks her lawyer says she will appeal. what does that look like and what happens if heard doesn't

we heard about their personal life, intimate details. i think that those who are celebrating johnny depp are a bit misguided in my view, i remember johnny depp as being the actor who said, and it will read it directly, one was the last time an actor assassinated a president? when president trump was president, as the republican celebrating him, i don't think that this is your guy, if you're looking for someone and i absolutely believe in due process and people should be heard, look at brett kavanaugh, not johnny depp. that's just my view, but the jury has decided and we respect the answer. >> jenna: if i might add, this elevates the me too movement to be all compass and against just women, many men, boys, are victims of assault, so i think it's all-encompassing to say it's not just women here, it's all of us as a collective problem. >> emily: that's great, because rolling stone published after the verdict that had zero mention of all of the vile acts that amber heard engaged in that the jury had now determined to be true. so my question

first of all, amber heard found liable for defamation. i want to get your reaction now that the verdict is in i'm really not surprised if you look at the way people were reacting to this truck and you believe it's lasted 6 weeks. it feels like even longer than that. ah, but the way it played out, all of the witnesses that took the stand on her taking the amber, her taking the stand to tell her story. and then johnny depp taking the stand and then reading what people were saying about them. listening to the people outside the court house, it was really easy to see early on that there were so many more people in johnny depp's camp and they are really on his side tending to believe his version of reality more so than than amber, hers, unfortunately. and why do you think that that was the case you're running? you know, i think it's very rare that we get a glimpse into the private lives of major a list. celebrities like amber heard and johnny debt. they total a lot of a very private details, very damaging things against one another. obviously

amber heard dep suing heard for 50 million dollars. the verdict is expected right now. let's listen in. i can't get which again, we're taking a live look inside the courtroom as the verdict has been reached in the libel trial between johnny depp and his ex-wife. amber heard depp is suing, heard for 50 million dollars in damages over her claims of domestic. right. ladies and gentlemen of the jury, what i need to do, i need to get the forms back to you. >> when you find for defamatory statement. >> one or more you need to fill out the compensatory damages has to be at least a dollar for compensatory damages and up to whatever you feel. the damages should be. and for punitive damages, you can put as 0 there. you can fill out that as well. but does lines filled out. okay. all right. so i can have you retire back to the. >> ration ruin. do that for me. ok? all right. so we'll be in recess to hear back from them. don't go too far. thank >> again, we're waiting for that verdict. apparently the jury still has paperwork that they need to fill out before they announced the verdic