the colonial spirit shows itself much more strongly in philosophical works, that is, when you read hegel, kant if you read it, it says that these modern philosophers are conversational, but when you refer to their works , you will see that kant very clearly divides people into four categories: red people, black people, yellow people, and white people, then he says that only white people have power. they have an abstract understanding and have the ability to rule, which can be white man himself. to be recognized, but according to hegel, the blacks can also be present as an euphemism of the world . he says very clearly that they are passengers on the train of civilization, or kant says that they only suffer from the pain of serving the whites, and the red-skinned people from this it is worse their situation says that they don't even bother to serve the whites and they are only allowed to serve the blacks . you can see that they are opening their eyes to humans in this way and this is because in the century and this in their policies and in their lives. in everything, in politics, in the me

, plato is the most important figure, naturally, those who read hegel here, all of our, as if all ofians of one or another direction, they were familiar with hegel's assessment of plato, his dialectic, or those who did not, did not accept hegelian philosophy, they were more inclined to schleirmacher, but again, interest in plato is shown by the fact that... in the forties, a new complete translation of plato by professor karpov begins to come out, i don’t really like this translation, but at the same time, karpov knows literature very well, german scholarship, he... well, as it were, reproduces the comments of stahlbaum, the main commentator on plato from the germans, of that time, yes, but from my point of view, the real reception of plato as plato, of course, begins with vladimir solavyov, yes, from his translations of plato and from his life drama of plato, so you add something, that's exactly it, that's general cultural, in my opinion. here there is a certain, in general, slightly detective turn, because everything is absolutely correct, dmitry said that of course they were famil

that history has a determined course is an idea on the left, they get it from mark to got it from hegel if you want to know the intellectual lineage of it, we don't have it because we don't believe in it, we don't believe history has an inevitable direction or that it will self-correct or reach the right result in the end except at the very end when jesus returns in glory so it is up to us exercising those great virtues, theological virtues of faith, hope, and love, to make a better world. >> we have to make history. >> you get the last word because we are out of time but there is resources available to help do exactly what katie was talking about, the voter toolkit, talking about that so people can get a copy of that. >> this is being released, the 2024 voter toolkit, you can find it in the new frc stand firm act, download the stand firm apps and look for the voter toolkit. included and it will be voter guide information, resources to get others involved, voter registration information, prayer points as we pray over the next 30 days, between now and the election, kind of a 1-stop shop

is it possible made this male monster hegel is following the meeting script. he's done his bed by securing his tree, or in this case, his log. now he'll call and call and call, hoping for a female to come along with an answer. at some point, the female will show interest in the mail. the mail will start to to his courtship of routine during court ship. the mails will allow the females to, to, on a set of flushing pads hidden under their main wings side. those pads are a natural gift, a nutritious present that sweetens the meeting deal. while the male transfers has for matter for the female feeds on his blood the but today the females are either not hungry or simply not interested the other male. on the other hand. so sometimes when mails are fighting, they'll start the same sex and sexual behavior. i don't know why it happens, but i want to know in so many instances, the study of bugs and sex feels like a new frontier of science. even though charles darwin wrote about insect meeting and reproduction in the 19th century, one of the most common answers, bug sex

how appropriate they were ending with hegel. let me be very brief in this regard. if may. one of the great honors i had during my time working in the white house was spend the better part of a day with a man who had been a specialist assistant to the president, which which i was for george w bush, had been a special assistant to the president for john kennedy, arthur schlesinger jr. and he and i had very different views on the biggest things passing a bill, although in the latter part of arthur's life we came to agree on many things, especially about the coming cancel culture, erase our culture and impact of what that would be on some of most important cultural institutions. but the reason i mention slight zinger and hagel in the same context is i said to arthur. i'm fast nated by your return often to this pendulum idea. yo, that that's this way and this way. and it seems to me he was quite i don't think it's a form of bad manners sitting in his living room. i'm not convinced i don't i don't really believe it. generally or specifically in in in a pendulum of american polit