but if you read the heller decision, it's a very narrow right indeed. it's a right to have guns in the home for self-defense and the heller decision itself made it clear that right is entirely compatible with a wide range of gun regulation designed to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. so even though the chicago handgun ban is at issue here, there are only two jurisdictions in the country that even have handgun bans. the real issue is when will this country move forward to enact strong regulation of guns while allowing gun ownership with regulation to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people, like extending brady act background checks to private gun sales at gun shows and elsewhere, a common sense measure that would save lives and is not unconstitutional under the heller decision as we read it. >> and certainly in that opinion we're very clear different entities can have the right to regulate how people own and have guns, whether in their home or other ways. allen, are you saying you're fine with reasonable restrictions but first befo

no withstanding a supreme court opinion last year, heller v. district of columbia, which said that the right to own a gun is an ancient right and a personal right and the government can't prohibit it. chicago is saying, well we got our power from the state of illinois and the state of illinois can prohibit it even if the federal government can't. i've never seen this before. or i should say i've rarely seen this before. the supreme court is so animated by the decision two of federal appellate courts that the states can prohibit guns in spite of this heller decision that it has agreed immediately to hear an appeal from these two appellate courts to say to the states, one of which is new york, the other illinois, you cannot ban all guns. steve: meanwhile, let's take a look at a case that originated in the state of florida. it is graham v. florida. we'll do that one right there. salazar v.buono. that's a case we have been highlighting here on "fox & friends." that's this great big cross in the middle of the hoe javy -- mojave desert. someone expla

joining us bobby heller, harris, and from the my next we have mark.obby, we had a sell-off yesterday. today with the bad news on employment, markets faring pretty well. we're in the green. what about next week? >> i think we have had a five or six point correction from the extreme highs of a week or so ago. even people who are looking for a down movement can be sort of satisfied with that. i think we have a narrow band from 1020 to 1030 that the technical traders are looking at. they're looking forward to next week. i think we have some earnings come up. i think alcoa is due out wednesday. that will be a real test of whether the market is going, the economy is changing, and these companies are making money. >> what do you think about the ten-year yield, now below 3.2%? will we see more of that? >> it's a beautiful question. the unemployment number put an end to that rally, i think, on the ten-year because the ten-year was gaining traction because if this number had been, let's say, only below 100,000 lost, then it would have given the february cover t

this is a letter from mark heller, the attorney for jon gosselin.to the tlc attorneys. we broke this story, we'll share it with you guys first. in this header, jon gosselin is demanding production be halted, done, on jon and kate plus 8. in two letters to tlc lawyers, deposit lynn demands the network cease and desist production and leave his property. and i want to quote one of the letters, he writes effective immediately morks production crews are to mention jon deposit lynn's family home for any reason. in the event that anyone enters the marital property, jon gosselin will notice the local authorities to effectuate police action against any trespassers, trespassers being production people, i'm assuming. >> and this comes hard on the heels of tlc's announcement that the show is now going to become kate plus 8, not jon and kate plus 8. >> yeah, the timing -- >> it's, please, explain, we've got 30 seconds. >> yes, the timing is suspicious. of course same day that tlc reveals the name of the show is being changed to kate plus 8. we're hearing now tha

with the landmark heller case which threw out a similar handgun ban in the district of colombia. >> wead begun preparing a year before assuming that the d.c. case would go our way. within 15 or 20 minutes we filedded electronically. >> reporter: the question is which d whether the second amendment applies not just in federal territories like the distribute of colombia but in states and cities like chicago. >> city attorneys are not surprised the high court chose to hear this case. mayor dailey who is in denmark trying to land the 2016 summer olympic games for his city was not immediately available for comments. in chicago, steve brown, fox news. >>> 8 o 20:00 on this thursday morning. temperature very chilly for this time of year. in the 40s in most places. metro often finds itself the target of lawsuits. now the transit agency is doing the suing. details on that comng p next. >>> it's october. let the fall festival begin. a little later this morning we're going to check out all the fun at cox farm. stay with us. ♪ [ woman ] ♪ early light breaks through ♪ music and dance calling you ♪

first of all, the supreme court now has ruled in the heller case that the law, the constitutional right applies to an individual. not to quote, a militia. that was a very significant ruling. this ruling is going to be an important one for the very reason you mentioned. does the individual have a right within the context of a city or state to protect himself. >> now, judge sonya sotomayor, this could be one of the first big tests for her. >> real hot seat for the new justice and it will be interesting to see how she comes down on this issue. i know there were a lot of people who had anxiety about her on the second amendment issue. we honestly don't know. but let's hope she judges this according to the constitution. the second amendment is there so that people can protect themselves and their property. if you're the victim of a crime, dialing 911 is a wonderful thing, but if it takes the cops 20 minute, that may be 20 minutes too long to protect yourself and your family. >> right. we saw that here in new york city with protecting actual store owners with the right to have is a gun here be