host: let me get a reaction to what heller clinton said recently. feministeve i am a because i believe that women deserve the same rights as men in every aspect of the economy and our society here at home and around the world. [applause] i devoted a lot of my public life to advocating for women's rights being human rights and making the case that we have to do everything we can through laws, regulations, culture to change the still existing stereotypes that hold women back. i think it is also important to recognize that we have made progress, but we are still a long way from where we need to atand i know, it if you look pay, equal pay is still a problem. it is a problem that gets worse as you get older. often are paid pretty close to equal. it is not actually equal, but within a few years, there begins to be a disparity. it is hard to explain all of the claim,nce because people women make different choices and therefore they have a different kind of work life because of the choices. that is not all of this. lily ledbetter a few days ago, she was tal

and heller decision, the second amendment no longer exists when we consider an individual privilege buterturn d.c. versus held, she's saying she wants to abolish the second amendment by definition. >> that ignores all constitutional decisions. even just scalia, justice -- before he passed, said that the second amendment has its limitations and, again, before heller, before heller, we did not hope that the second amendment equals the right of individuals to bear unlimited arms with no regulation. >> it showed the disagreement. >> you want to uphold the tradition of the second amendment in this country. >> the second amendment, the rest of us know. >> what you have in the race now is something extraordinary. you have the republican nominee tacking to the far right to shore up the conservative part of the base of the party instead of running to the right in the primary and tacking towards the general. it is extraordinary that for an issue that actually americans have a pretty -- there is a consensus about gun rights for the most part. 90% of americans upwards of certainly over 85% want som

feinstein's amendment 3944 senator johnson's amendment 3993, senator klobuchar's amendment 3910, senator heller's amendment 4005, senator durbin's amendment 4029, senator sasse's amendment 4023. the presiding officer: is there objection? without objection. the clerk will report by number. the clerk: the senator from maine, ms. collins proposes en bloc amendments numbered 3997, 3998 3933, 4030, 4008, 3920, 3969 3935 as modified 4038, 4043 3980, 3944, 3993, 3910, 4005 4029 and 4023. ms. collins: mr. president i ask unanimous consent that the senate now vote on these amendments en bloc. the presiding officer: is there objection? without objection. ms. collins: i know of no further debate on these amendments. the presiding officer: is there further debate? if not all in favor say aye. those opposed say no. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes do have it. the amendments are agreed to en bloc. ms. collins: mr. president i ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding rule 22, at 11:15 a.m. on thursday, may 19, that all postcloture time be considered expired on the blunt-murray amendment numbered 3900. fur

scalia had written heller. he found there is a personal right to keep and bear arms that operates against the federal government via the second amendment and does it apply to the states. and justice scalia probably from the conservative side of the bench, the most vocal opponent of substantive due process ever on the court. the most vocal critical opponent of lockner is given the opportunity to apply the second amendment to states via the privileges immunity clause where the legislative history of that constitutional provision was quite clear that was one of the core things they intended or to -- or to accept the existing precedent of the court, the substantive due process that he criticized and left justice thomas alone on that. and so i think there is a lot of fruit for further inquiry that we could gain by looking at those areas of -- they often agreed on the outcome but got there by different routes that are very telling and worth our in inquiry. thank you so much. >> thank you professor and thank you all f

versus heller was decided, we are all originalists now, she said. professor mitchell opined on some of these issues and heller, of course, established an individual right it bear arms under the second amendment but remarkable also because both the scalia majority and dissent tevens' resorted to the original public meaning. e could have some short answers on that, as short as a complex answer could generate. >> sure. mers can make answers. that thurgoodnion marshall wrote in the 1970s that fewer than 12 f persons and he argued based on originalist evidence that the jury trial and the sixth amendment required 12 persons because that was the original meaning. it's nothing new to see justice dissent. and so everyone's an originalist to this extent. everyone thinks the original meaning counts for something. i'm not aware of anyone either in the judiciary or legal academy who thinks original eaning of a particular is absolutely entitled to no weight at all. ame, i don't think there's anyone who is an originalist in the opposite direction, meaning the orig

justice scalia had written heller.he personal right to keep and bear arms that operates against the federal government via the second amendment. then they're confronted with the question of does it apply to the states. justice scalia probably from the conservative side of the bench, the most vocal opponent of substantive due process ever on the court, the most vocal critic of the doctrine of lockner is given the opportunity to apply the second amendment to the states via the privileges immunities clause where the legislative history of that constitutional provision was quite clear that that was one of the core things they intended, or accept the existing precedent of the court. this substantive due process president that he otherwise criticizes. he went the substantive due process route, leaving justice thomas alone on that. i think there's a lot of fruit for further inquiry we can gain by looking at those areas they -- they don't often always agree on the outcome but sometimes got there by different routes that are ve

versus heller and the right to own a private gun? they'd say, absolutely not.y, do you want judges who will upthoeld president obama's illegal executive amnesty, they will say no, no, and no again. >> because you are asking them ridiculous questions. that's not what these cases are about. >> well -- >> that is what the election is going to be about. i know this is going to sound, again, going back to the dorkfest we're having over here. it matters. i mean, it matters so much and, again, you know this better than anybody, maybe, no more so than this year, where it's not hypothetical whether or not the next president is going to pick somebody on the supreme court. it's real. and it's going to be immediate and it's the seat that tips the balance. it is so real and so tangible on so many issues. >> let's move on now and talk about foreign policy, because he met -- he paid a visit to the former secretary of state under richard nixon, henry kissinger. can you tell us, dana, about that meeting or why now? >> i think it's fascinating that donald -- first of all, the lo

versus heller upholding the right to keep and bare arms. hillary clinton said the supreme court is wrong on the second amendment. that's bad. that's like what she said about the miner, we will put the mines and miners out of business, then she goes -- right -- i tell you she goes to west virginia, how were they? i hate to say i won kentucky but i won west virginia by even more. of course, she made that statement after i had already won kentucky. we're going to win them all. we're going to win them all. we're going to win them all! if hillary clinton gets to appoint judges -- this is really important. defense is number one, we have to protect our company. economy, everything is important but without defense we don't have a country. our military, as you know, it's being decapitated, what they're doing to our millimeter itary i incredible. i saw over the weekend a documentary on our great airmen. these are people flying our jets and they're running out of parts for our fighter jets. these are fighter pilots, these are incredible men and they'r

versus heller, upholding the right to keep and bare arms.illary clinton said the supreme court is wrong on the second amendment. that's bad. gun free zones. we're getting rid of gun free zones. i can tell you. the second amendment is on the ballot in november. the only way to save our second amendment is to vote for a person that you all know named donald trump, okay. >> so, trump followed up with a tweet on saturday, quote crooked hillary wants to get rid of all guns and yet she is surrounded by body guards who are fully armed. hillary clinton responded at a meeting for trayvon martin in front of 60 moms who lost kids to gun violence. >> parents, kids and schools should have the right to keep guns out of classrooms, just like donald trump does at many of his hotels, by the way. this is someone running to be president of the united states of america, a country facing a gun violence epidemic and he's talking about more guns in our schools. he's talking about more hatred and division in our streets. even about more nuclear weapons in the world

she said again recently that the heller decision that protects the right of individuals to keep and bear arms was wrong. right now with the death of justice scalia and the vacancy on the court, it's four to four, four support the heller decision, four against. if she gets in she will appoint somebody who changes that and what that means is it's no longer a personal right to have a gun, but every city, county and state can completely ba firearms in america. this would be the greatest reduction of second amendment rights since the founding of the republic. it's a tremendous issue and americans need to understand the extent of her radical position on it. >> of course donald trump came out with a list of people that he would consider for the supreme court earlier in the week. does he have that much of a problem with conservatives, senator, that he has to six months before the election say here is whom i would appoint to the supreme court should i become president? >> he said he was going to do that early on. i think it's his own decision to do so because he wants to establish that his goal f

the heller case is the supreme court decision a few years ago. it struck down washington, d.c.'s ban on handguns. it said gun ownership is an individual right. you disagree with that. >> well, there were a lot of parts to that decision. it said, new ber one, there was an individual right to own a firearm, speflkly it contemplated having a firearm for purposes of self-defense in the home. she doesn't dispute that principle. but the decision in heller actually went beyond that and said that the d.c., for instance, the law that they passed that called for safe storage of firearms to prevent toddlers from getting access to guns that were stored inadequately in the hope, they did that and in doing sew they opened the door to customize safety measuring to allow proper precautions in especially highly densely populated areas. she thinks it went too far in preventing places like new york to prevent safety measures in the population. >> that's a supreme court ruling. he the other day put out a list of people help said if i'm president, one of these people will be my appointee to the supr

trump are lindsey graham, dean heller, and ben sasse. that's it. in the house, we reported last night that the two republican members of the house who are known to be explicitly opposed to mr. trump were carlos curbelo of florida, scott rigel of virginia. a grand total of five members of grus, three in the senate, two in the house. that would imply not exactly a great rift in the party. since then, though, four more members of congress have been in touch with us today to let us know that they would like to also be recognized as being crammed into that car. oh, really? yes, so behold, we happily correct the record. four additional confirmed members of congress from the republican party who say explicitly on the record today they are opposed to donald trump. so we've still got those three senators on the top row there. lindsey graham, ben sasse, dean heller. in the house, carlos curbele, scott mitchell. add eliana of florida, bob dole of illinois, richard han 1/2 new york, congressman reid ribble of wisconsin. we have spoken with all of their offices

i was proud to develop the provisions with dean heller of nevada. senator heller and i recognized when the public lacks even a rough sense of the scope of the government's surveillance program, they have no way of knowing if the government is striking the right balance, whether we are safeguarding our national security without trampling on our citizens' fundamental private rights, privacy rights, but the public can't know if we succeed in striking that balance if they don't even have the most basic information about our major surveillance programs and that's why my focus has been on transparency and why senator heller and i crafted the provisions in usa freedom that require the government to issue detailed annual reports for the surveillance of authorities at issue, importantly, the government now has to provide the public with estimates of how many people they have had their information collected and for certain authorities, like those permitting the targeted collection of call data records or the communications of foreigners abroad, the government

versus heller was decided, we are all originalists now. now, professor mitchell op pined on some of these issues and heller established an individual right to bear arms under the second amendment but it's remarkable also because both the scalia majority and justice stevens' dissent went to the public meaning of the the second amendment. will it endure? and that is among his greatsest legacies. so if we could have as short an answer as complex topic as that can generate. >> sure, even nonoriginalists ments ling to make argue when it serves their purses. there's a opinion that marshall wrote dissenting from a supreme court ruling that upheld a jury of fewer than 12 persons. he argued on originalist evidence that the right of jury trial required 12 persons because that was the original means. so it's nothing new to see him in dissent in heller trying to make originalist argue ymingts. so everyone is an originalist to this extents. everyone thinks it's counts for something. i'm not aware of anyone either in the judiciary or legal academy who t

lauren: heller clinton is ahead in the delegate count without mentioning dean appeared donald trump is the presumptive gop nominee. she'd been now if you agree we can't let him become president. nicole: led off west virginia coal miner challenged hillary clinton on comments about the coal industry was on after the bell yesterday. >> i didn't hear the first part of the statement where she said she would bring cleaner energy jobs to the coalfield, but i am hurting now. there's a lot of families hurting going without right now. we are not worried about down the road. we are worried what we are going to do for families now. nicole: this after clinton's remarks in march. >> i'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key in the coal country. we are going to put a lot of coal miners coal companies out of business. nicole: she later apologized and called her remarks in a statement. bill copley told reporters clinton's apology did not slay him and he would've liked to hurt more of what her plan is. lauren: the navy seal,

numbers, crunched the and in the first quarter, heller a clinton $.70 of every dollar race.in the presidential a big turnaround in the early part of the campaign. his allies got the biggest share of wall street money. by the pew center found that, a nearly one quarter of metro areas, middle-class adults no longer make up a majority. that is up from fewer than 10% in 2000. the plight of the middle class has become a major theme in the -- in the presidential race. is official, vice president michel temer has become acting president. president rousseff calls her suspension unfair. she says she will fight the charges with all her legal tools available. is expected to release a nationwide address this hour. vonnie: thanks. about 30lose in minutes. abigail doolittle's live at the nasdaq, which is the laggard today. abigail: it has been a volatile day for the nasdaq. and one point, dragged on by technology and health care sectors. but those hectors -- those sectors have recovered to some degree. drag, apple shares are lower . having hit their lowest level in two years after the nikkei review said the

so that's why my focus has been on transparency which is why senator heller and i crafted the provisions and that now require the government to issue detailed annual reports for the surveillance authorities and importantly, the government now has to provide the public with estimates of how many people that had their information collected and for certain authorities. the records are communications of foreigners they also have to say how may times it has run searches for this data. when the american people have access to that kind of information they can better judge the balance programs. that's not just my view, that is shared by the general counsel for the office for the director of national intelligence. addressingall brookings last year he said the intelligence community recognizes that with secrecy inevitably comes suspicion and the possibility for abuse. i and many others from the believe that there would have been less public outcry from the snowden leaks if we had been more transparent about our activities before hand. sameems to me that the need for transparency applies with equal

she said the supreme court decided wrongly about heller, the first scotus position, only one at thisicans have the right as individuals to own firearms so self-defense. she said that was decided wrongly. >> right. >> she's been very vocal about -- her daughter even reinforced this as well in her public speeches actually. hillary, depending the audience she is speaking to changing her approach and this is why people don't trust her because she's vague enough, she talks around it and that's her main issue. >> corey, what about it, because hillary clinton was caught on tape secretly at a fund-raiser in which she said the supreme court is wrong on the 2nd amendment, referring to the heller decision which gives an individual right to bear arms. so in truth, isn't that evidence that hillary clinton does, albeit secretly, oppose the 2nd amendment? >> absolutely not. look, hillary clinton and the american people are very much in alignment on this issue of common sense gun control in this country. >> that's not what she said. she said supreme court got it wrong. >> here's what she has said co

one of the stabbings occurred on heller place, the other on north 13th and julian street.here's no word on the condition of the victims or whether any arrests have been made. >>> water rescue crews searched all weekend for two teenage boys. the two 15-year-olds were at woodward reservoir on saturday with friends and family on a memorial day weekend outing. they jumped off the boat with several people, but when the others returned to the boat, they realized the two boys were missing. family members identified the two boys as jamari wilson and josiah pratt. they say the boys were best friends. this is the second drowning incident at woodward reservoir since it opened in april for water recreation. authorities in sacramento county are investigating the death of a father and daughter found dead in a slew off highway 160. the bodies of 23-year-old kyler jackson and his infant daughter caylee were found over the weekend as was jackson's vehicle. family members say jackson was driving with his daughter from antioch to sacramento last week but never showed up. >>> sheriff's deputi

when we come back, former fed governor robert heller will weigh in. a june rate hike would be justified? dow mild start to the day up five points. don't go away. is car? came courtesy of james and patricia thompson. this tv? margaret and tom lee. the championship game ball? that was sebastian diaz. good guy. and all i had to do was ask for their money and pretend i was investing it. their life savings is now my lifestyle. female announcer: don't let someone else live the life you're saving for. find out if you're dealing with a registered investment professional at investor.gov. it's a great first step toward protecting your money. before you invest, investor.gov. thank you. ordering chinese food is a very predictable experience. i order b14. i get b14. no surprises. buying business internet, on the other hand, can be a roller coaster white knuckle thrill ride. you're promised one speed. but do you consistently get it? you do with comcast business. it's reliable. just like kung pao fish. thank you, ping. reliably fast internet starts at $59.95 a month

there is this man, his name is senator dean heller of nevada. he says i oppose the nominee. and this man, i am as frustrated and saddened as you are about what is happening to our country, i cannot support trump. and there is senator lindsey graham who says, i cannot support donald trump. there is three in the senate, the house, two, carlos carballo of florida says i cannot support trump, a moral decision. so that is it, and scott rigell, three members of the senate, two in the house. of elected republicans, that is it. five people. i don't know of any others in washington. five, you could fit the entire never trump movement among the elected republicans in congress, right? you could literally put them in a station wagon with a lot of room left over for groceries and pets. if you had no pets or groceries you could fit them into a nissan sentra. there are five of them total. and only one of them that anybody has ever heard of is lindsey graham. there is a lot, a lot of noise. and today, blanket coverage over this split in the republican party that everybody believes has been

and a guy named dean heller. can anybody verify for me those are real people?] no. that's it. i mean, you could fit them in a very small car with room for either two other people or three dogs. >> seth: sure. [ light laughter ] >> i mean, that's it. that's the big resistance. that's the party being torn apart. >> seth: and you know, in donald trump's defense he has said -- because hillary has received more votes than he has. >> yup. >> seth: by 12 million to 10 million. but donald trump said, you know, to be fair i ran against 100 people and she ran against one. and that's an excellent point. >> yes. and it's mathematically true. when you compare him to all other republicans who have ever run for president ever, nobody has ever gotten more republican votes than him. ever. >> seth: now, do you -- there isn't that much daylight. and i think that's why this unity is a fake story because there will always be unity. there's not that much daylight between what the republican party stands for and has been standing for and donald trump's positions. >> yeah. i mean, he'

she said again recently, that the heller decision that protects the right of individuals to keep ands wrong. harris: who else says that? vermont-loving bernie sanders. during the debates it got kind of chip by around the gun debate even within her own party she has problems with this issue. with donald trump, what did he get this weekend? a big endorsement, a very months early endorsement by the nra. some are questioning how important was that? really timing of it. mitt romney, john mccain they didn't enjoy that kind of support early on. there may be some conflict within those in nra whether or not they should have moved so quickly, reading about some of that. doesn't matter. it is done. donald trump wins on issue. she might lose on the issue to bernie sanders anyway within her own party this is tender subject. perfect place to hit her. >> i agree with you completely. she wants to talk about guns because it's a way to stay in the leftist wheelhouse. pacify progressives and differentiate herself from bernie. this is one of the few issues she can do that and say something original abou

joining me is mark heller -- mark halperin, the cohost of "with all due respect" and also "the circuswhich is on hiatus on showtime. welcome. what i want to achieve here is some sense of bringing you up to 30,000 feet to look at this. you start early. you do it every day. you talk to everybody. you are in the process of writing a book. what does it look like, this political season to you? mark: i like and respect hillary clinton. i like and respect donald trump. i think either of them could win. while that doesn't make me a unicorn, for people thinking itut the race, covering it, is very unusual. we are in a polarized country. we have to very polarizing candidates in the case of donald trump, dividing his own party. in the case of hillary clinton, still fighting bernie sanders. she is also dealing with somewhat of a divided party. although i suspect her party will be more united. for the first time since the founding of the protests -- the founding of the republic, the country is facing a choice to between in some ways, very different people. in some ways, to people who are both new y

and the supreme court says district of columbia versus heller, the d.c.t a constitutional right to bear arms. they said it is a constitutional right. she says she doesn't like jur is prudence on the second amendment. you could make a strong case that she doesn't like the second amendment as it stands. >> you could make a case she doesn't like the supreme court decision. that doesn't mean, kayleigh, you know this, you will be a great lawyer one day, i have no doubt, but doesn't mean she wants to abolish the second amendment, it is something she simply hasn't said. that doesn't mean, yleigh, that her positions on guns and restricting some gun ownership is not unappealing to the nra. that's certainly the case, correct? isn't that enough? >> i do want to point out though that just yesterday in one breath hillary clinton oversimplified four of donald trump's policies, saying he is for a complete ban on muslims, praises the north korea dictator, two can play this game. if you want to criticize donald trump for those, then you have to look at her doing that to a

trump are lindsey graham, dean heller, and ben sasse. that's it. in the house we reported last night that the two republican members of the house known to be explicitly observed carlos car bell low and scott ridge. that brings us to five members of congress, three in the senate, two in the house. that would imply not evenings saktly a great rift in the party. since then though, four more members of congress have been in touch with us today to let us know that they would like to also be recognized as being crammed into that car. oh, really. yes. so behold we happily correct the record. four additional confirmed members of congress from the republican party who say on the record today that they are opposed to donald trump. we've got the three senators on the top row, and in the house we've got two and now we add iliana of florida, bob dold, richard hannah of new york and add congressman reed hribal of wisconsin. we have spoken with all of their offices today, they have all confirmed that they should also be crammed into that midsize sedan or station

heller, upholing the right to keep and bear arms.e court is wrong on the second amendment. that is bad. that's like what she said about the miners, going to put the miners and the mines out of business. then she goes, right, to -- oh. boy, tell you. west virginia, how were they? i hate to say i won kentucky but i won west virginia by even more. but of course she made that statement after i had already won kentucky. we're going to win them all. we're going to win them all. we're going to win them all. if hillary gets to a -- to appoint judges -- defense is number one. everything is important but without defense we don't have a country, and our military, as you know, it's being decapitated. what they're doing to our military is incredible. i saw over the weekend a documentary on our great airmen, and these are people that are flying our jets, and they're running out of parts for our fighter jests, -- jets. they're going to junkyards, plane graveyards, where the old planes -- and they're taking parts off. they're cannibalizing the plane

supreme court and we will see the heller decision overruled, which means the second amendment right toar arms will be stripped away from every law-abiding american. if we allow the next president to be hillary clinton or donald trump, we will see the same economic stagnation, we will see taxes rising on the american people, we will see jobs going overseas. donald trump's massive tax increase would put us into a recession. i'm fighting for the working men and women of this country. if we allow hillary clinton or donald trump to become president, we will see america continue to abandon israel. both hillary and donald say they will be neutral between israel and the palestinians. i think it's high time we had a president who stands with israel. and both hillary and donald say they will keep in place this iranian nuclear deal. if you agree with the iranian nuclear deal, if you think it's a good idea to send $100 billion to the ayatollah khamenei, a radical islamist terrorist who chants "death to america" then you should vote for donald or hillary. as president i will rip to shreds this iran

there are a few different ones, senator heller of nevada was quoted as saying i vehemently oppose our nominee. the interesting thing is th get dance between donald trump and paul ryan. in a statement issued after their meeting but i bet dollars to doughnuts written before the meeting they refer to our few differences, they spoke of our many important areas of common ground and urged the republicans to unite around our shared principles, to which one response is name one. one shared principle. for example, paul ryan feels very strongly about restoring the article i powers of congress and reigning in the executive overreach of the current president. trump says if ford moves a plant to florida -- to mexico he personally will stop it. and he says carrier is going to bring back those jobs to indiana. he as president will make it happen. no idea what inherent or explicit presidential power permits that sort of thing. >> let me just interrupt to say that i talked to a source close to paul ryan this week who said that trump reassured him -- this was a big issue in the meeting -- that trump ry

for more on the democratic race is democratic strategist david heller.ck us with, betsy woodruff from "the daily beast." welcome. welcome back. david, to you, i want to get started with. this when you have hillary clinton there in kentucky really campaigning. we know kentucky has been good to her and the clintons in the past, is that a signal that maybe some worry, you know that, sanders would come around but not only that, but the primary campaign could be hurting her ability to take on trump when he was vulnerable the last couple of days whether it come to tax returns and, you know, audio recordings from 91 and how he trd womein the past based on "the washington post" report or "new york times" report, i should say. >> i don't think it is hurting her at all that way. there is no reason why she can't do all the things that she would be doing even if bernie were not in the race in terms of going after trump, in terms of starting to lay the foundation for lines of attack against trump. trump which she's doing already. the naral person on a few minutes ago

it's not walter heller inflation. we've been very low. a serious problem with the fed hit its target. we are looking at the fed seen numbers they feel more comfortable with. tom: is overshoot part of the policy? does she say we are going to overshoot? forget about the data and the actual progress. bruce: everything she talks about in terms of how she balances risk and how she thinks about the economy says they are willing to expect an overshoot. tom: i'm going to have a moment of silence. he nailed this years ago. francine: when you look at inflation, the u.s. may overshoot. what's going on elsewhere that the u.s. is doing right? i know it's wage growth. what can we look at the u.s. and replicate? bruce: the basic story is europe and japan have had it two or three recessions since the financial crisis. the u.s. is had a steady stream of growth. theon't want to worry about growth. what's happened is we've been growing a little over two. that's been decent growth relative to the weak productivity performance. that onet's important of the re

. >> kim, you got joseph heller and there's a scene in catch-22 when the pilots are talking to each other and one of them says i want to have a long life and the other one asks why, and the answer is, what else is there? i imagine the three of you know full well what else is there. that there's no guarantee for a long life. so, for the three of you, whether for that, for that risk, or for frankly the apathy of your readers, or your editors, have you ever thought about stopping? no, this isn't worth it anymore. there's something else to do, or, no, you just kept going. thanks. >> i stopped. i might go back. i can see going back. i feel like every day i make the choice to stay here, and it's a difficult choice to make because i miss being in afghanistan. miss being in pakistan issue miss living in the middle of the story and having conversations at night bet the future of countries, and feeling like you're actually seeing a country change and watching a democracy get built. miss that feeling. but i decided to see if i could live normal. as normal as any journalist is, and i am a metro repor