i would say i can't resist saying on heller that many of the post-heller cases have been acts striking down state and local laws passed by the legitimate bodies of the state legislatures and the cities. >> hey, i'll make the trade. i'll make the trade. we can do it right today. we'll have an announcement. i will make the trade. >> what will you give up judge wood for heller? >> oh, boy. >> i'm not quite prepared to answer that. although this morning in the louisiana case. >> it's a serious question, would you give up roe for heller, i think that's what he's asking you. >> or citizens united. >> citizens united plus heller for roe plus shelby county, for roe plus shelby county. take it or leave it. >> and then a no trade clause. >> the thing that bothers me about citizens unit ed and shelby county is that they go to the root of who participates in our democracy. >> shelby county is the voting rights case. so it's very hard for me -- the closer you get to protecting the sound functioning of our democratic institutions, who votes, who can get to the poll, what things belong to the legisla

comisión entregue más remesas >>> nos quedamos en méxico, tijuana donde charlatanes se aprovecha del hellerintegrantes en un caso de homicidio suicidio. indicó q l imagen de su hija y cuatro nietos fallecidos para conectar fondos y trasladar a los menores a méxico situación que es falsa >>> que se reduzca estos medios para ganar un tipo de ingreso realmente no tiene moral >>> el alcalde de tijuana lamentó el incidente que ya la familia presentar una denuncia >>> el presidente trump hijo que catalogara a los cárteles mexicanos como organizaciones terroristas debido su papel en el tráfico de drogas y personas. el mandatario hizo las declaraciones durante una entrevista de radio. esta nueva clasificación le dará bien estadounidense más poder para lidiar con esta problemática en el país >>> (sonido ambiente) >>> (gritos) >>> en méxico, las protestas contra la violencia contra la mujer. algunos de tus incidentes se registraron cerca del palacio de bellas artes donde se utilizaron lanzallamas y otros artículos para quebrar videos en lugares públicos. solo el año pasado los crímenes contra las muj

be unfair to say that there wasn't any success because for almost a year a trans key negotiator mr heller former ambassador to afghanistan held 9 rounds of talks extensive talks with the taliban very influential on the ground in afghanistan everybody agrees that they say is a player and no one can ignore and the peace cannot be restored without although many countries still view them as a terrorist group so some were saying that to marry it was close and these negotiations were success but that it was called off last minute because of the bloody incident that took good dozens of lives including an american soldier and the taliban's work week to blame america. we. didn't want some pollution but it was for to believe. it was considered going to be. one of the most serious message for the forward which is to go for the star that was my colleague talking to the taliban political movement while they visited moscow so some say that america is losing this game in afghanistan because trump is trying to play is solo game there are so many peace initiatives on afghanistan led by most by iran but al

command a troops despite the criticism it's not just a republican president who has pardoned atrocities heller brings us more and just a heads up her report does include our new feature the q.r. code you can use to get more background on the story. victorious election campaign on a platform of nonintervention but don't trump is still juggling dwarves at home against fake news and the democrats and far away against tara so it's hardly surprising he has a soft spot for the dogs of war no not this one these ones. i . the. walking free cut to see of the president's generosity and you know why well when you've got almost a quarter of a 1000000 soldiers aboard boosting morale and giving an incentive to put your life on the line in foreign lands it's just what you have to do when our soldiers have to fight for our country i want to give them the confidence to fight for some of their trumps words fail to ring true against a backdrop of human rights reports questioning the morality and lawfulness of american activity abroad for those unconvinced these latest pardons can be added to the already bulging

testimony corroborated evidence of bribery uncovered in the inquiry and that the president abused heller and violated his oath by threatening to withhold military aid and wage health meeting in exchange for an investigation into his political rival. well thousands of kilometers away the man on the other end of the phone call that sparked the inquiry ukrainian president a lot of our selenski is getting more attention from the u.s. than he ever wanted so how does the impeachment inquiry look from the capital kiev and what's at stake they have usenet connelly reports we had. i think good phone call it was normal we spoke about many things and the so i think when you are already there nobody bullshit bullshit me yes no carry. no pressure on ukraine to launch an investigation into trump rival joe biden son hunter that's a claim that since been challenged by numerous top u.s. officials testifying to congress irrespective of whether this ends in impeachment to trump what does this mean for his visibly uncomfortable guest polygamous alinsky and the country's elite. as worrying is ukraine gate is

be unfair to say that there wasn't any success because for almost a year a trans key negotiator mr heller former ambassador to afghanistan held 9 rounds of talks extensive talks with the taliban very influential on the ground in afghanistan everybody agrees that they say is a player no one can ignore and the peace cannot be restored without although many countries still view them as a terrorist group some were saying that to merica was closed and these negotiations were success but that it was called off last minute because of the bloody incident to dozens of lives including an american soldier so some say that america is losing this game in afghanistan. because trump is trying to play is solo game there are so many peace initiatives on afghanistan led by moscow by iran but trump always rejects all the invitations and never takes part in these talks and he's trying to kind of settle it all on his own and just before go into afghanistan this thanksgiving he pasted afford to shop picture of himself as rocky balboa and i think this is how he feels maybe and maybe this is what he wants to be

we heard that from the taliban and from mr heller's the shape an agreement so it was a nearly done agreement and also so we can say that was somehow close to like a dream about afghanistan but at the same time we can say that the taliban never recognized the government in kabul and they always recognized to have direct talks with them calling them american puppet. and mr trump and his team managed to convene. both afghanistan president mr ghani and the taliban chiefs travel to america to gather to sign the final agreement but it was called off the last minute . another violent incident in afghanistan the dozens of lives including an american soldier and the taliban of course were very quick to blame america. i mean. sort of. it was going to. be. one. of the serious message for the former which is to go through all of this stuff . so despite all the aphorism and all the promises we hear from mr trump i can see that the war in afghanistan is far from over the situation on the ground remains very violent some say that's because america is trying to play a solo game because there are so many pea

heller, therring to president, i would like you to guest: i'm not a second amendment expert, so i'llave to leave that to others to address, sorry. host: on twitter, from mark stone, he tweets this. he says that elections have consequences. the president has every right to nominate judges to the supreme court and the appeals courts. obama stacked the courts with a bunch of liberal judges. they rule against everything that president trump does. is there evidence of that? that the judges appointed by the -- in the obama administration, have ruled against the trump administration? guest: i think when you look to a lot, especially the district court injunctions, a lot of those have been by president obama's appointee. i don't have the numbers here, but i think you'll see in ideologically charged cases, there is that big difference between president obama's appointees and president bush's or president trump's. host: let's hear from eddie in massachusetts on the republicans line. caller: good morning. i understand there is a ruling that the same president can't be taken to a civil court. i

jeffrey heller, the city and county of san francisco oh, and and your band of architects a great thingjust a great thing. >> to impart to the history of this building is remarkable. to see a person who comes in with a gloomy look on their face , and all of a sudden you start talking about this building, the gloomy look disappears and a smile registers across their face. with children, and i do mainly all of the children's tours, that is a totally different feeling because you are imparting knowledge that they have no idea where it came from, how it was developed, and you can start talking about how things were before we had computer screens, cell phones, lake in 1915, the mayor of san francisco used to answer the telephone and he would say, good morning, this is the mayor. >> at times, my clothes make me feel powerful. powerful in a different sense. i am not the biggest person in the world, so therefore, i have to have something that would draw your eye to me. usually i do that through color, or just the simplicity of the look, or sometimes the complication of the look. i have had peop

gayle spoke to hanks about the movie and how heller convinced him to take the role. >> here we are.s our first day on our "neighborhood" set. that's tom hanks. >> i love how you and the director meet and how this collab filmmakers. and i had head it and literally 24 hours before i went to this birthday party for my grandkids. and i said, oh, oh -- we were chit chatting, blah, blah, blah. i'm a director. oh, i read this interesting article in "the new york times" about female directors. have you seen it? and she look ad me and said, "i'm in it." i said -- "please, let me remove my shoe from my mouth." so i chatted with her there, and i had heard about her film "diary of a teenage girl." so i immediately took a look and said this lady's going places. >> you said "i want to work with her." >> when she attached herself to "a beautiful day in the neighborhood," and after one read and a quick phone call with her i said, "this is only just a matter of when we can do it." w obvious -- the look. are we going to do teeth? i don't have the same nose. what are we -- she said, you'll have a wig,

>> so i went to mari heller, the boss, our director, and i said any way we can incorporate mott hot pomegranateshe said, "it can be sitting on the counter." and that was it. so i don't know if it's in the scene or not. but if you see a scene in my kitchen look for the cup of hot pomegranate juice. >> jimmy: did they even have pomegranate juice in the '70s? >> maybe it was cranberry juice. >> jimmy: oh, you know what? mr. rogers famously never had a urinary tract infection. >> well, there you go. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: that's probably why. >> also the fact that -- the raciest he got was a glass of hot cranberry juice might be one of the reasons he talked so slowly. >> jimmy: maybe so. >> because there wasn't any legal addictive stimulants in his diet. which is why there are so many pauses in your average episode of "mr. rogers' neighborhood." >> jimmy: yeah, you've got toe slow down to play mr. rogers. >> i watched like 800 episodes. i watched a lot of hours. i was like 180 hours into it and i realized, oh! this is not for us. it's not for grown-ups. if you know that there are dopes and jerks in

no evidence in all of the cases that have come before the supreme court since heller in 2008.d to believe, senator, that the united states supreme court would allow parents to sue for the making of a gun that they believe is constitutionally protected. because, of course, they wouldn't. >> no matter what you think the second amendment is really protecting, there is absolutely no doubt that at the time of our founding there was oodles of gun regulation. at that time many stalgtes didn allow for concealed weapons to be carried, lots of ammunition had to be registered with the government. i think any reading of the second amendment has to allow congress to be able to regulate the kind of people that owns guns and the kind of guns that are owned by civilians. but, yes, on this particular -- >> which is what the supreme court said that in heller just explicitly. you have a right to keep and bear arms, but that constitutional protection goes to handguns in your home and shotguns, basically. >> and so i think the supreme court will allow for either congress or state legislatures to b

he says, he met his match" the film,"a beautiful day in the neighborhood"by was directed arielle hellers ironclad in her discussions abat she's going to do, she said, essentially, "you'll get a wig, you'll get some eyebrows, you'll get a sweater and blue deck shoes. the rest is up to you. >> do you know what this is? it's lloyd! >> brown: his foil is a driven and cynical journalist sent to write a profe of mr. rogersma for esquire gazine, and the film is based on a true encounter in 1998.pl ed by matthew rhys, best known for his role as a russian spy in "the americans," tli jour is confounded by the sincere and glacially-paced mister rogers. and as it turns out, so was the welsh actor, rhys. diyou know mister rogers growing up in wales? >> not a jot, nothing. not a whisper. and then i dived into youtube and i thought, "what's going on?" i had no idea. it seemed bizarre to me that this -- i was like, ¡has he footten his lines? is that why he speaks so slowly? what's happening? what's been incredible was having a three year old son, and for him to be the cond what it truly is has been eye

former senator dean heller from nevada on the 2014 armed bundy standoff in bunker hill, nevada. the blm has become a bureaucratic agency of basically terrorism, and so at what point do we band together as elected officials and say enough is enough of the blm and that is from the state official michelle fiore of nevada. the federal government, and the blm and the forest service and the dea and those other people are not elected. the other entities, they answer to me, beaver county, utah sheriff, cameron newell. you people of nevada and not the washington bureaucrats should be in charge of your own land and i will fight day and night to return full control of the nevada lands to the rightful owners, the citizens. and that is from senator ted cruz. this rhetoric often turns into violence. in 2012, utah governor gary herbert signed the utah transfer of the public lands act which required federal land agencies to cede federal land to state control after 2014. a researcher at the university of california, san diego, found that in the year after utah and other western state legislature

that's right heller thanks that the meeting in the presidential palace was a chance for the 2 men to clear the air after a monumental hole scathing criticism of their lives there are still big questions being asked about the role and future of nato in the modern world and of its 70th anniversary meeting in london next week and the reports were french capital. it was a longer handshake than usual for the french president it seemed to be a sign that emanuel was in a conciliatory mood as he greeted nato secretary general at the elise a few weeks after it described the military alliance as brain dead but if you can still timber could hope for an apology or a retraction he didn't get one as mike ross stood by his claim that nato that direction because from your position so he threw the questions i ask are open questions that we have the result of peace in europe. treaty the relationship with russia the subject with turkey who is danimal so injuries or decision let's not negotiate cost sharing a burden sharing maybe we needed a wake up call if you permit english expressions stoltenberg sai

heller it's still not startling blue skies and cold nights in china lotus tried streaming off the plateau which means much of central china will at least see some cloud the odds for to rain is not to be ruled out shanghai is down to 11 degrees now of hong kong's hang on to pretty warm 26 with lowish humidity the pictures a little bit drier in central china for choosing the temperatures very much the same in this more cloud than clear sky for many places to be honest the rain is still apparent in the philippines in just touching parts of thailand and maybe cambodia and across borneo maybe concentrating more so in sumatra singapore and but what you should be seeing is rain here in a good part of indonesia it's rather unlucky still there's a reason for it is one reason why kenya has been suffering the floods is the indian ocean water was i should be off the coast to sumatra for example that tends to kill off any prospect of a good rainy season doesn't stay that way just as the moment. now the prospects of arriving in india of course are quite slight and of the frontal system most of the nort

under a lot of fire lately for answering questions in more details clumping up price tag on her medic hellern this presidential election, and it is concerning because i think when we were going into this presidential election, medicare was actually very popular with not just election, medicare was actually very popular with notjust democrats and progressives but republicans and independents. but i will say this. there is a lot of discussion about what are democrats doing? they are fighting, is a going modern, progressive? but the thing about it is they are having a debate, it‘s a primary. this is something democrats do over and over again. they do this over and over do over and over again. they do this overand overagain. do over and over again. they do this over and over again. the voters will decide, i work for 0bama in 2008. the same thing talked about, we talked but universal health care. i don‘t think there is anything new here but there needs to be better messaging on what is said that medicare for all is and where do people stand on it who supported? you say it‘s a debate what you have

hot button issues. ,oth republicans and democrats the various important second amendment decisions, heller and then mcdonald were pretty recent. mcdonald had just been the year before. senators have constituents who care very much about this issue. scream, like, not yeah, you know. [laughter] east side of new york or west side? >> exactly. here is what a lot of them did. i know i cannot talk to you but i want toses know that you understand this issue. have you ever hunted? no. do you know anybody, does anybody in your family hunts? no? do you know anybody who hunts? no. have you ever seen a gun? [laughter] i was pretty pathetic with all these questions. i was feeling pretty bad about being sympathetic. it's right and proper that senators should ask about these things and a lot of them have constituents who care very deeply about this issue and want to know that a judge is going to at least understand their concerns however the judge rules. so i'm sitting there one day with a senator, the senator from idaho, i won't say his name but there are only 2 -- [laughter] out there and he is a great

forward, heller which protects people having handguns in their homes and shotguns, that that will bes. there's nothing to suggest that and, in fact, this ruling yesterday, willie does just the opposite. you don't allow a decision to go forward that would lead to liability for making something that was constitutionally protected under the second amendment. >> yeah, this was a case where remington arms, the manufacturer of the ar-15 was appealing to the supreme court to stop this lawsuit filed by the families of sandy hook victims, that terrible, terrible day in 2012 almost seven years ago, and as you rightly say, i think this leads to the next question, will we now have a flood of lawsuits from victims suing other gun manufacture manufacturers, not just for the ar-15 but for other weapons. you are responsible because you made the weapon that took the life of someone i care about, you are legally responsible. that will be an interesting question going forward. >> we'll be following that. back to the daca issue, how do you see this proceeding forward as i guess we await? >> this is real

without referring to heller or precedent, in your own words i would like you to explain how those twoilitia are different. guest: i'm not a second amendment expert so i'll have to leave that to others to address, sorry. host: on twitter, from mark, he tweets this. he says that elections have consequences. the president has every right to nominate judges to the supreme court and the appeals courts. obama stacked the courts with a bunch of liberal judges. the rule against everything that president trump does. is there evidence of that? that the judges appointed by the obama administration have ruled against the trump administration? guest: i think when you look to a lot, especially the district court injunctions, a lot has been by president obama's appointee. i don't have the numbers here, but i think you'll see in ideologically charged cases there is that big difference between president obama's appointees and president bush's or president trump's. host: eddie in massachusetts on the republicans line. caller: good morning. i understand the ruling that the same president can't be taken