henley. it was an official guess it as it is you're on to the patients that time is over. it's finished for now. where is this like someone who finally jumps into the pool? now it is a response for every publication is rarely ever seen maintenance. the foolish mistake of responding me, ronald navigation, will be even more severe and the wrong kind of chain. you have the regime until the submits. remember that you're wrong as many underground miss. thousands drove bases across the country, shoot underground basis. hundreds of thousands of miss uh, hundreds of thousands of trustees for created because you are really nice in a homicide, any rock and was preparing for war with the united states. the and now they're using it against israel. so this is something much bigger than is wrong. you're wrong can easily out of the machine and it's right, it's already in a more than enough problems. it is. so the machine would be smarter to that and this and i think or maybe into fraud, which would actually like to see it. it's is rarely retaliation so that the writers can really have wi

. >> my name is jackie henley., stanford alumni and an alumni of general mcmaster's research team. what i appreciate is your ability to separate yourself from hyper partisanship and allow yourself to see all of the facts before you. i guess along that same vein, what advice do you have for young people hoping to get into public service in such a hyperpolarized environment. >> jackie, thank you. thank you for the opportunity to work with you and it's great to see you. i cannot imagine having written either of those books anywhere but at stanford i got to work with amazing young people like jackie who helped with research and timelines and did oral histories of many in the room that i could draw on for this book. they are people that i learned from every single day. what you have to do is focus on facts, first of all. a lot of times these days people want to rush to an emotional judgment about an issue. instead of really considering the facts associated with whatever the problem is. we have to focus on a higher degree of civility. we have to respect each other and have meaningful dis

several of our valued supporters are here today, including barbara and alex boughey, michael crow, troy henley, patricia houston and jolene mahoney. welcome. a big thank you to all members of the richard nixon foundation in the audience. i know there are many here today, especially our presidents club members. we cannot host these renowned speakers and events without your support. so thank you. our distinguished guest today is neil gorsuch, associate justice of the supreme court of the united states, a colorado native. justice gorsuch served as a judge on the us court of appeals for the 10th circuit before his appointment to the supreme court by president donald j. trump in 2017. he has also worked as a senior official at the justice department, where he helped oversee its civil litigating divisions. as a partner at a law firm, a law professor and as a law clerk for justices byron white and anthony kennedy. his new book, which you all have in your hands, is overruled. the human toll of too much law. it just hit stores this week and is sure to be his second bestseller. following his 29 book, 20

. >> my name is jackie henley, a stanford alumni and an aleum my of general masters research team. what i appreciate about this book and conversations i've had with you previously is your ability to kind of separate yourself from hyperpartisanship and allow yourself to see all of the facts before you. and i guess along that same thing, what advice do you have for young people hoping to get into public service in such a hyperpolarized environment? >> well, jackie, thanks, and thanks for the opportunity to work with you over the years, and great to see you. wow! so i write in y the book, just, by the way, because we're at a hoover event, i wrietz in this book, i cannot imagine having written either of those books anywhere but at stanford university and hoover. i got to work with amazing young people like jackie who helped with the research and timelines and did oral histories and maybe many of you in the room who were on the nsc staff for this book and great colleagues like peter who i learn from everyday. i think what you have to do is you have to focus on facts, first of all. i mea

so a study by new world wealth and henley partners said forecast for this year, 9500 of them leaving,ly to china. but we have taken a look at a lot of these numbers and taken into general account, the total millionaires, including those people with those with houses and other assets, they can't move around. we think by 2028 you'll see a 20% reduction in the overall number of millionaires in the uk. >> and of those liquid millionaires, how many of them are foreign and how many of them are foreign and how many of them are british? do you have the figures on that? >> well, unfortunately it's quite hard to get ahold of, you know, so we take a lot of time looking at hmrc and treasury data over this stuff. you can't dig in and find out who is who. but what we can say is that the non—dom regime, which is, you know, going to be totally upended. well, we assume so . upended. well, we assume so. there's a lot of uncertainty as as you as you know, jacob, and as you as you know, jacob, and as viewers at home will know, the issue we've got here is that now we're seeing and as charlie was saying, p

my name is jackie henley. i'm a recent stanford alumni and a alumni of the mcmaster's research. one of the things i really appreciate about this book and conversations that i've had with you previously is your ability to kind of separate yourself from hyper partizanship and allow yourself to see all of the facts before. and i guess along that same vein advice do you have for young people hoping to get into public service in such a hyper polarized environment. oh, jackie, thanks. and thanks for opportunity to work with you over the years and it's great to see you. well, so, you know, i, i write in the book just by the way, because the hoover event i write in this book in battleground i could not imagine of having written of those books anywhere but at stanford and at hoover, i got to work with amazing young people like jackie. you who who helped with the research and timeline signs and did oral histories of maybe many of you in the room or the nsc staff that i could draw on for this book. and great colleagues like peter, who i learned from every day. so thanks. i think what you h

michael heseltine was my predecessor in henley . dominic predecessor in henley.as my was the neighbouring mp. >> they've all been scathing about you. it's like nicholas soames as well, churchill's grandson. >> and there's a very, very negative about you. >> what is it about you that rubs people up the wrong way? >> well, i think that that you have to face the fact that they had a particular view of the uk, which i don't share. i believe that we're great if we do things on our own. i think we're great. i think that national independence is extremely important, and i think that that point is proved beyond peradventure of a doubt in unleashed. yes, because having secured full national independence, we were able to do things differently, such as the vaccine rollout, such as the aukus pact, such as the taking a different stance from our european partners on on ukraine. do you think? and so i think and i believe and what worries me now is that the starmer government is really determined to try to roll all this stuff back and it will be a disaster. you know, you can't w

and i was looking at some figures today from the henley consultancy, which advises people on residencyzenship, those people who have the ability to move their money and move themselves. there are said to be 9500 leaving britain now , but what i really 1501 00:09:27,880 --> 00:09:2

let's hear the voices of hannah in henley, and in penrith, john in wilmslow, thank you all so much.y more coming up. —— anne. what should the bbc be talking about, hannah?— what should the bbc be talking about, hannah? good morning and thank ou about, hannah? good morning and thank you for— about, hannah? good morning and thank you for having _ about, hannah? good morning and thank you for having me _ about, hannah? good morning and thank you for having me on. - about, hannah? good morning and thank you for having me on. i - thank you for having me on. i think— thank you for having me on. i think you _ thank you for having me on. i think you should be talking about— think you should be talking about medicinal cannabis and the fact— about medicinal cannabis and the fact that the law changed six years— the fact that the law changed six years ago to help children like my— six years ago to help children like my son alfie who does have a prescription on the nhs and since — a prescription on the nhs and since that law changed, not one child _ since that law changed, not one child has— sin