and i guarantee you, sheriff mike hennessy would have done so if the compensatory space had been made available, and it did not. but in the history -- in the history, the first time ever of the two jails in the top of the hall of justice, my administration shut down county jail 3. that says a lot, where we consolidated county jail 3 with now county jail number 4, and we're now almost stretched completely at county jail number 4 because we needed to consolidate based on those conditions that existed, and so that we'd be more efficient and effective with our administration in overtime. and that is really the outcome of us coming together. but what concerns me a little bit about the debate of whether to build a jail or not, not just where we might house the sheriff, but drawing on my experience of 7 years on the budget committee of the board of supervisors is the question of whether to have a jail or not frankly is, in the sequence of criminal justice, almost on the back end of the spectrum of the role of having a jail and incarceration in san francisco. and i'm a little concerned or tro

the sheriff over many years and i was there when he said he's going to run and he was carrying on hennessy's program. that's what the college is for. those young people who have dropped out of school and instead of having them go to jail, and if i had asked the head of the police commission, if they would put together and mandate instead of these young people that are small offenses, instead of having them sweeping the streets, removing graffiti from buildings to mandate that they must go to that southeast college to get their ged and they can't leave until they are finished in their training and get a job. thank you very much and i hope everything works out. >> thank you, a ringing endorsement. >> commissioner, at one time at the southeast building we had a very good program. we had a gentleman who had a stellar record graduating drop outs and giving them a ged. so in course of time, that program

he sat down with the president of stanford yesterday and hennessy asked him, 20 years out, what is thehing? take a listen to what he had to say. >> will be the new thing 10-20 years from now? >> one of the things that will happen is just like the ability to ask more questions that you can reasonably ask the search engine today, something that we are actively working on is -- we want facebook and this whole movement of social action to not to be about sharing moments in the day today, but about real utility. >> google has been working to make search more personalized. zuckerberg is talking about something bigger. >> this idea that it is not just about you searching as much as it is the internet services presenting them to you actively. it knows that you are going to work this morning. you see some of this at google. it says, you are going to work. the weather is this and there's traffic on the way. you should leave earlier. facebook, google, other companies are trying to be more active in presenting the information you need before you know you needed it. >> the cofounder of twitter came

he sat down with john hennessy the president of stanford university yesterday.t is the big thing 10 or 20 years out. take a look at what he had to say. >> what is going to be the new thing 10 or 20 years from now? >> one of the things i think over a five-year tenure. the will exist is just like ability to ask more questions than you can ask a search engine today, something we are actively working on is because we really want facebook and this whole movement of social apps to not the about sharing moments but also real utility. >> google has been working to make search more personalized, but suckers talking about something bigger. >> there is this idea that isn't so much about you searching as services giving you things come presenting them to you actively. it knows that you are going into work this morning. you see some of this with google now and its predictability. facebook, google, other companies all trying to be much more active in presenting you with information you need before you even know you needed. >> the cofounder of twitter came out with a new quest

with john hennessy, the president of stanford university yesterday and he was asked if 20 years out, the next big thing? take a listen. >> what will be the new new thing 10 or 20 years from now? >> one of the things i think over five or 10 years will exist , just like the ability to ask more questions than you can reasonably ask a search engine today, something we are working on. we want facebook and this whole movement of social apps to not just be about sharing moments in the day today but also really utility. >> google has been working to make search more personalized. zuckerberg is talking about something bigger. >> there is the idea that is not so much about you searching as it is about internet services giving you things, presenting them to you actively. it knows that you are going to work this morning. you see some of this with google now. it has predictive abilities and they pop up the weather. facebook, and google are trying to be more active presenting the information you need before you know you need it. >> the cofounder of twitter came out with a new question and answer.

the phone and the penpiece, i thought keith hennessy at stanford had a good point toot. it's more like an erasable pencil because with the u.s. district court that continues to thwart president obama on some of the major things like the national label of relations board and most recently the supreme court over the weekend on the little sisters of the poor, the president's staying power for what he says he wants to do, all of those things could get overturned as well. they telegraphed so much that they don't need congress, i think he could have done the thing that is only required by the constitution, which is periodically report to the congress, sent them a memo. he doesn't need the congress, what's the point of going up there? just to give a political speech? >> why is he doing it? >> it's tradition. i think it's become rote. >> it's not inconsequential. he signed an executive order to allow 800,000 undocumented workers to stay here, number one, and congress did not challenge that. what is going to happen, i think, the storyline after tomorrow night, is courts will be v

joining us back from the new york stock exchange erin gives from s&p iq and skip alsworth from the hennessyhnology fund. i don't know if you were there for the last conversation with peter and jeff. at the end of it i kind of wanted to slip my wrist. peter was saying buy canned goods and bottled water, jeff less so, but you get the point. is it as nasty, erin as they see it or do you see it a little less so? peter's point was whatever economic growth we have is totally false and driven by the fed and it's not sustainable. what do you think? >> i wouldn't quite say to put all your money under the mattress and buy canned goods just yet. i think there's a lot of anomalies happening in december and some odd data which i agree with. look housing started declining as soon as the fed started talking about tapering and rates came up. and we've had all these excuses about housing just isn't coming back because of seasonality and we're looking until february march, and april. i'd wait until then just before buying those canned goods and look to see if we have that recovery. the same with payroll numb