. >> no, i mean it was given to henry hyde, whose restriction of federal funds for abortion killed more women than legislation, and he got the award too. >> isn't that ironic. do you know there was a hash tag on twitter. hash tag wwgd - what would gloria do. >> someone told me that. i thought i should ask what would help me. >> i think for a lot of women you are a compass "what would gloria do in this or that situation?" praise? >> neither one. i feel it as a kind of interesting activist question. what i take it to mean is what would we do out of self respect. and you know, impulse to equality and democracy. i need to ask myself that. if that's what it symbolizes to other people, i'm proud of that. >> thank you so much for talking to al jazeera, and inviting us into your home. >> sunday. >> you have to look at the suffering of these children. >> director of unicef, anthony lake. >> every one of those numbers is an individual child. >> helping the innocent victims of war. >> what can unicef do? >> there's a very short answer... our best. >> every sunday night. >> i lived that character.

provision in this bill before the body for more than 25 years i had the pressure of serving with henry hyde in the house of representatives who is famous because he has penned the hyde language which deal with abortion. all of these 25 plus yearses that matter has been put over a year at a time. now, we've never chosen to make that permanent law. this year republicans have south to injection in this bill one of the most controversial issues over the last 40 years. a woman's right to choose. and don't take my word for it. leading republicans acknowledge that abortion politics -- gentlemen senator john cornyn said quote, this bill is being hijacked and used to debate something it doesn't have anything to do about and that is the subject of abortion. ... orrin hatch said -- quote -- "i can't believe the senate has become so political that we would raise that issue at this time on this bill." the solution is so simple. take the abortion language out of the bill. the bill dealing with human trafficking is going to pass. if we don't do it now we'll do it. it's something that is imperative that we

henry hyde illinois chairman of the committee signed this. lamar smith. pushover when it comes to those illegal immigrants. and how the american government should treat them. so it says indeed i and regional counsel have taken the position apparently well-grounded in case law the i.n.s. has prosecutorial discretion in removal proceedings. see attached memorandum. further a number of press reports indicates i.n.s. has already employed that discretion. optimally removal proceedings should be terminated only upon specific instruction from i.n.s. officials issued in accordance with agency guidelines. however the agency has not promulgated such guidelines. let's make it clear. it's well-established in the law. unlike other parts of the federal government that there is discretion when it comes to the application of the law and immigration law. so i just want to say -- and the attorney general, i have a definition here of politician. are you a politician? because i have webster's. are you a politician? >> i am an elected representative, yes. >> you're a politici

henry hyde illinois. chairman of the committee signed this. lamar smith.no pushover when it comes to those illegal immigrants. and how the american government should treat them. so says indeed ins general region's counsel has taken the position apparently well grounded in case law. ins has prosecutorial discretion in the removal proceedings. see attached memorandum. optimally, removal proceedings should be initiated and terminated only upon specific instruction from authorized ins officials issued in accordance with agency guidelines. ins apparently not promulgated such guidelines. so let's make it clear. it's well established in the law. unlike other parts of the federal government that there is discretion when it comes to the application of the law and immigration law. so i just want to say -- and the attorney general, i have a definition here of politician. are you a politician? because i have webster's. are you a politician? >> i am an elected representative yes. >> you are pea a politician. right? i'll find it. it will be say elected representative. i

henry hyde illinois chairman of the committee signed this. lamar smith.shover when it comes to those illegal immigrants. and how the american government should treat them. so it says indeed i and regional counsel have taken the position apparently well-grounded in case law the i.n.s. has prosecutorial discretion in removal proceedings. see attached memorandum. further a number of press reports indicates i.n.s. has already employed that discretion. optimally removal proceedings should be terminated only upon specific instruction from i.n.s. officials issued in accordance with agency guidelines. however the agency has not promulgated such guidelines. let's make it clear. it's well-established in the law. unlike other parts of the federal government that there is discretion when it comes to the application of the law and immigration law. so i just want to say -- and the attorney general, i have a definition here of politician. are you a politician? because i have webster's. are you a politician? >> i am an elected representative, yes. >> you're a politician.

for well more than 25 years i've had the pleasure of serving with henry hyde in the house of representativesho was famous for a number of reasons but one is he has penned the hyde language which deals with abortion. in all these 25-plus years that matter has been put over a year at a time. now we've never chosen to make that permanent law. this year republicans have sought to inject in this legislation one of the most controversial issues, a woman's right to choose. don't take my word for it. yesterday senator john cornyn said -- quote -- "this bill is being hijacked and being used in debate for something it doesn't have much to do about and that is the subject of abortion." orrin hatch said -- quote -- "i can't believe the senate has become so political that we would raise that issue at this time on this bill." the solution is so simple. take the abortion language out of the bill. the bill dealing with human trafficking is going to pass. if we don't do it now we'll do it. it's something that is imperative that we get done. but it should not be dealt with in relation to abortion. take the ab

henry hyde was a congressman from illinois who served in the house of representatives with me for a period of time. he authored the hyde amendment that said no federal funds shall be used to pay for abortion procedures except in very limited circumstances: rape, incest and life of the mother. and that has been put in appropriations bills every year since without question, without challenge. what senator cornyn is trying to do is to make this permanent law and make it part of the human trafficking bill. i don't doubt that this is an important issue. i know it is because i've served in the house and senate. but i do question whether or not we should make every bill that comes along a vehicle a carrier for debating abortion or other really controversial issues. this question of passing a human trafficking bill to protect the scores hundreds, perhaps thousands of victims of human trafficking is one which would pass in a heartbeat in the senate if the senator from texas would remove this controversial section. senator leahy has offered that substitute. i hope that we'll have an opportunity to v

i served in the house of representatives with henry hyde; a very fine man. he has had his name affixed to an anti-abortion bill, anti-abortion legislation for almost three decades. and it's been continued year after year in appropriations bills. what i'm talking about what's happening in this legislation it would make it permanent. it's wrong. if my friend, the republican leader is so in tune with getting this passed, take that legislation out of the bill. otherwise it will not pass. take it out. it's unfortunate that republicans are committed to turning a bipartisan bill into an unrelated unconscionable plit -- political fight? is it worth turning a piece of legislation that would do good for our country? democrats would not allow a bill to prevent human trafficking and child pornography be hijacked. we can do a lot of good with this legislation. i hope my republican friends will choose do do the right thing and take this out of the legislation and pass this bill without any gimmicks. talking about gimmicks, mr. president, there are a number of reports in t

it does have henry hyde language protecting against federal funds be used for abortion.'ve always thought the world of henry hyde. and was honored to overlap with him two years. and his work in standing for the unborn children, the most innocent among us, is just an extraordinary life's work that he did. i don't know that federal funds for abortions for people on medicare is as big an issue as some might think, but the hyde language is in there. puts it in the tax code. that's a big deal. some of my democratic friends were not big on that. and there's also re-authorization for chip. there's the secure rural schools. our rural schools, especially those in -- that have national parks have been cheated for many years. from the income that they were supposed to have by giving up land they couldn't tax anymore. by giving up other sources of revenue from the land. they agreed to allow land to be used or become national forests. they were to be reimbursed by freeze from the sale of timber. but we have a forest service, administration, and i -- not just this one, it's been going

henry meyer joining us from moscow. this month we could see another major global banks find with google slashes. this is commerzbank. caroline hydeetails. caroline: at least $1.4 billion. this is what has been reported. it's all to settle federal state claims that commerzbank was yet another lender that violated u.s. sanctions. i means they were dealing witht blacklisted country such as iran sudan. and of course this builds on the amount of european company said to be doing this. . bnp paris remember the record of the fine they had to take because they played guilty. they said, we violated the u.s. sentience. commerzbank with 1.4 will kill all birds with one stone. it will pay off the justice department. the federal reserve, the manhattan district attorney and the new york department of financial services. all of them will get their pound of flesh. but also resolve on money-laundering matter that has been going on with u.s. it is adding to it. 22 cases so far of financial institutions having violated sanctions. they are coming fast. guy: now we need to make sure you're playing by the rules. this isn't the first time. caroline: de