in this case, henry kissinger came to santiago in june 1976.et with pinochet and his aides told him, have to be clear with pinochet that he has to return to civilian rule and that he has to stop crimes against humanity, stop violating human rights. this is literally the memorandum -- chile becoming much like spain and the whole world is watching and all the pinochet understands from you is a direct approach for his conduct. instead, kissinger goes into the meeting and tells pinochet that kissinger's opinion, victim of leftist propaganda and the only crime he has committed is overthrowing the government that was going communist. kissinger basically said, we want to help you, not hurt you. you did a great service to the west. here have to give a speech on human rights but the speech is not directed at you. it would help if you could clear up your position on human rights little bit because the u.s. congress is breathing down my neck and i'm not going to be able to give you, because congress is going to cut off the aid unless something changes her

i'm, you know, a fan of the book, diplomacy henry kissinger, but definitely not a fan of henry kissinger'saches. you are talking now about what the future plan should be for ukraine, including in the north atlantic alliance, but from what has been said and heard over the last week, because zelenskyi spoke at various tribunes, from different tribunes, is it clear that this is the future in the articulation of the ukrainian government, and there was a summit in vilnius, now we are already at the end of october, that is, where and in what way are we going now and are we going to nato, are we not going to nato, are they waiting for us there or not, in your opinion, are the efforts of ukrainian diplomacy sufficient for the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine to somehow speed up this plan for ukraine's accession to nato, or do we have nothing to expect from the washington summit , everything depends on us, the ball, no wonder, still on our side, although this decision seems to depend no longer on us, but on the political positions of nato countries, first of all the usa, i really h

, probably the person... who had a hand in the first place and all these actions in chile was henry kissingerto our security and the american president, and e. kissinger, he believed that, in general , the threat - the watering of all of latin america is quite so serious, yes, that in general you need to support anyone, be it a dictator or a person who is ready to shed the blood of his own opposed, but that's just it the reds did not come to power in chita, but the us law that money conquers evil worked for chile, the country gave up to 80% of its copper production to a group... of corporations, the council of america, its founder david rockefeller. two more american companies, anaconda and kinekot copper, received hundreds of millions of dollars. it is curious that many us scams in chile became known thanks to the journalistic work of seymour hersh. it was he who proved that the hands and feet of the cia were sticking out from the chilean scenario. he analyzes in detail one of washington's most important destabilization operations. foreign state, demonstrates external internal actors this. p

and, in particular henry kissinger helped produce. i'll explain.chard louis is here with an update on morocco. good evening richard. >> good evening mehdi. the latest on the breaking story. rescue teams are still racing to find survivors from friday's massive earthquake in morocco. over 2100 people confirmed dead as of today. that number is expected to increase. unfortunately. another 2400 people are injured with the majority in critical condition. the u.n. estimating hair, over 300,000 people were affected by the quake. now, some of the worst destruction it is in an isolated mountain area outside of the epicenter. about 46 miles outside of marrakech. roads into these communities are often narrow and why, dig many blocked by boulders and rubble. some locals are leading search efforts as they wait for the government resources to arrive. hundreds are sleeping outdoors in marrakech, many homes severely damaged. and others fear of being indoors during an afterthought. international crews are assisting recovery efforts, including a small team of experts

ru, under the patronage of then us secretary of state henry kissinger, they decide that they need a proven military coup. the first attempt at a military revolution was made in june 1973, but was crushed by soldiers loyal to allenda. the second in september began with the famous phrase, it’s raining in santiago. this was the radio command of a revolutionary trained by the americans, led by augu stapinochet, who betrayed his country. in a matter of hours, the military occupied administrative buildings and fired rockets at the presidential palace, allende committed suicide. an ultimatum was presented to president allenda, who was in the presidential palace, lamaneda. he was asked to resign and leave the country on a special plane with his family and associates. allenda refused, and then the military began storming the palace. after a five-hour battle, the presidential palace slept. president salvador allende shot himself in his office, not wanting to fall into the hands of the rebels. the military burst into the palace and found allenda's body at his workplace, either without realizing that

the former google ceo and chairman joined forces with the legendary diplomat henry kissinger and daniel huttonlocker to write a book titled "the age of a.i. and our human future." and he's been working to keep america at the forefront of the field by serving as chairman of the national security commission on senior administration. i should note i'm a senior adviser at schmidt, a philanthropic initiative. to begin, i wanted to understand what a.i. applications could believe. >> many people believe it will start to get better on its own. that is a very, very big change in history. up until now, the tools that we as humans have bill have been under our control. maybe poorly, but under our control. there is a point -- many people think that it will be within next four to five years, some people think more, i think maybe five years -- where the system will be able to learn something new and act on it. this is called tool use. it is indeed a paper from deep mine recently on extreme risks and it goes through some speculation of what would happen. imagine if one of these things learns how to ge

henry kissinger. jonathan graves -- liz: blackstone. >> under steve schwarzman, might be the number one guy at some point. liz: very smart guy. >> you've got bill bill ackman, you've got ken griffin, who else? eric schmidt. liz: okay. >> henry kissinger. robert kraft, which is kind of interesting. liz: daniel he bet sky. >> eric. >> mitt. now, how many billionaires are on that list? are pretty amazing. i mean, ken griffin's worth $35 billion, pretty sure robert kraft is worth several or billion. again request, this is designed to get private capital frauing to the -- flowing to the ukraine at some point, hopefully when the war is over. that's one of the big sticking points, the war needs to be over first, but they're trying to get it sooner. and they're going to sit down and brainstorm. from what i understand, they're meeting at 4:30, 4:45. it's at the ukrainian mission to the u.n. so it's in midtown. from what i understand, just to give you an indication of whether the meeting's happening or not, the

. >> you play secretary of state henry kissinger and the new movie, >> of course. >> he has been a director, start in productions and shakespeare and spent seven years awes the lead on the showtime series >> i will kill you, you hear me? >> schreiber, who is of ukrainian descent, now has a role on the world stage. shortly after russia's 2022 invasion of ukraine, he founded bluecheck ukraine, an organization dedicated to supporting humanitarian efforts on the front line. >> it is the next essential situation. >> this week, ukrainian presidents zelensky made the case at the u.n. that russia is a world threat. >> this is clearly a genocide. evil cannot be trusted. >> nearly a year a half into the war and a sum in the u.s. oppose increased support for ukraine >> is he elected to congress, is he our president? what does liev schreiber say now? >> "firing line" with margaret hoover is made possible in part by: robert granieri, stephens inc. vanessa and henry cornell, the fairweather foundation, the tepper foundation, the asness family foundation, , kathleen and andrew mckenna through the mckenna

as henry kissinger said, who should i call to talk to europe, so that it is already clear that thereof course, greatly changes the purpose of this union . because if at one time, schumann had passed on, they would have known what awaited their brainchild in the future. and what they would do with it, they would probably be very surprised. uh, a few more statements, of course, there was one about what ukraine has achieved phenomenal results towards membership of the european union since she was made a candidate. i will remind you of this moment. this is june 2022. that is, apparently, in order to join the european union, it was necessary to remove the positions of the butcher and imprison kolomoisky, and this is a fantastic result on the path to membership. european union, who will have to be imprisoned and fired from positions in moldova? i don’t know, but we went there in georgia. well , we marked the map, there are people there who are candidates for membership, they have been since he was still at home birth, and everything is missing there. they didn’t complete something there, b

henry kissinger is now one of ukraine's lobbyists in nato.g the theme of zelensky’s fate, his arrival in kisinger, this is what determines zelensky’s fate, only he came to store it or dig it up, on the contrary, zelensky met there in new york. everything is about fate, yes, he didn’t come, he met there, but it determines zelsky’s fate , this meeting, the fact is that any meeting, it is not planned with zelevsky, he can’t offer anything, i want to meet with the first, second, third, fourth, the system doesn’t work that way, they offer him, he can try to find out who can tell him important words. i am sure that kissinger today, as the patriarch of diplomacy, advised him one simple thing, and under no circumstances should he go to the polls, nominate another candidate, and we understand perfectly well that zelensky is already used material for america, but if zelensky does not listen these councils, he must organize mass imprisonments, if better, then of course executions, because almost the entire environment around block 95, which is now worki

of a telephone conversation between president richard nixon and his national security advisor, henry kissinger, where the 2 man openly discussed the involvement in the queue, and most importantly, the importance of concealing us well. we didn't, as you know, our hand doesn't shown this one though. we didn't do it. i mean, we help them. we created the conditions as great as possible for 50 years on the real cost of the destruction of a and a government is clear. it led to the appointment of a brutal dictatorship, responsible for the debts of tens of thousands and the oppression of freedom and democracy and surely for decades to come on. perhaps most tellingly, as we remember, i end is heroic death resisting the crew were also today witnessing the consequences of the 2014 c i a back to and you claim perhaps in years to come just like and she laid the 2 extent of the us involvement in the you are a might on move and will also be revealed in the meantime, just like, and she like 50 years ago. it's order we people that will pay the price for the c a is colbert interference in the affairs of solver

prior to her current position, she was the senior vice president henry kissinger chair and director of international security at csis. at least her current title is a little shorter than that. she was sworn in as the 35th deputy secretary of defense in 2021. i think it is interesting that the title of her dissertation at m.i.t. was change agents. who leads and why in the execution of national security policy? given the swirl of strategic and technological change all around us, i would say a change agent is exactly what our times call for. we are fortunate to have dr. hicks lead off our conference and after her remarks, she has graciously agreed to submit to a rigorous cross-examination by yours truly. please join me in welcoming the deputy secretary of defense, dr. kathleen hicks . dr. hicks: good morning and thank you for the kind introduction. thank you for the invitation. to both of you, thank you for your many years of service and leadership and support for the defense department. before i go on, i want to acknowledge the tragic accident in darwin, australia and express my condolen

get there according to theve conversations that we hadha durg that time with george schultz and henry kissinger as well. i do believe our military needs to be focus, needs more resources and needs to be prepared and capable to fight multiple continents at the same time. i say that as say this. our world is more volatile and dangerous than it has ever been. whenbe you watch this new axis f evil voucherizing between china, russia and iran. been going on for years. on top of that the bricks which is brazil, russia, india, china and south africa, the new coalition that is primary objective of eliminating us as reserve currency and from a military standpoint being able to challenge us. they just had a meeting where they attracted the attention of, 12 or 15 of the countries, i can't member exactly, are looking to join that new coalition. so we're starting to see these lines are drawn. if we don'tne take that seriousy we're going to be caught off guard. final thought is that china, as you suggested, they are going to spend a significant portion of their gdp on accelerating their military weaponry. we

. >> to me, henry kissinger and eric schmidt wrote this book about a.i.rts is it talks about renaissance and the enlightenment dispelled what was before myth making. >> yes. >> so when you look at a phenomenon like the sun rising, people would say that is the sun god. >> the chariot of the sun. >> and then reason took over and we could understand why this happened. with a.i., we're also going back to that world where we know the answer but we don't know why it is the answer. >> that is right. >> so the computer will tell you the answer. >> and it can't tell you. >> it can't tell you. right. so we're -- we used to trust religion, now we will end up trusting a.i. >> that is right. >> we'll no longer trust human reason because we know how limited it is. >> people ask me because i did terminator, where sky net, the evil superintelligence from the future was manipulating past to get the out come that it required and it destroyed humanity and in a nuclear war. i don't think a intelligent agi would need to use nuclear weapons because it would wipe out too much o

get there according to the conversations that we had during that time with george schultz and henry kissinger as well. i do believe that our military needs to be focused, needs more resources, needs to be prepare and capable to fight multiple continents at the same time. i said that to say this our world is more volatile and dangerous than it has ever been. when you watch the new axis of evil rising between china, russia, and iran, on top of that, the bricks, brazil, russia, india, china, south africa. a new coalition with a primary objective of eliminating us as reserve currency and from a military standpoint being able to challenge us they just had a meeting where they attracted the attention of, it was 12 or 15 other countries, that are looking to join that new coalition. a we're starting to see these lines drawn if we don't take that seriously we are going to be caught offguard. final thought is that china, as you suggested, they're going to spend a significant portion of their g.d.p. on accelerating their military weaponry. we have to be very competitive. and we can't which is the good n

. -- henry kissinger has been going for many decades.ound that clarence thomas is a regular with harlan crow and stays at this camp that is essentially like a fraternity. other members of that camp include charles and david koch. what we were told and talking to many people have spent time there over the years, the justice developed this relationship and bond with the kochs on these trips to the bohemian grove which answers the question in part we have been wondering about witches, what is going on on these trips and vacations that harlan crow is taking justice thomas on? it turns out part of the answer is he is spending time with people like the kochs who have active interests and cases at the supreme court. amy: if you can talk about a case that is coming up, i'm looking at one article in the hill, chevron case, supreme court could take sledgehammer to agency power. explain what this case is all about and why that is called chevron. >> it takes its name from a previous supreme court case, landmark case in the mid-1980's called chevron.

that's what henry kissinger and his counterparts in the 70s decided if we aren't going to get to that point we need to get to the point military aggression is at that point and secondly it has to be economic rules of the road that we can all agree to. what we are seeing right now are practices that the constituents will not tolerate you to those irritants will continue to destabilize this relationship i think that's why it feels so fragile rightec now because something like 80% of americans view china not as a friend, not as a competitor but sometimes as an adversary and when you see that you are on a road to a bad place and so we have to change that. there's been disappointment along that path. do we do that through the economic sanctions? or is it through some overwhelming change in the military balance of power where we have such a great deterrent capability that it changes the calculation? >> on the military side we are in agreement i think generally we have not done enough with regards to equipping taiwan and deterring military force. we kind of know what needs to be done but it'

i had a conversation with henry kissinger.seems to me, today for which he could be inconvenient, and that it would be against his interests, and the conversation took place after that , how i returned from moscow and i said that in moscow, in general, there are very uh disturbing feelings about how the minsk agreements are being ignored regarding the fact that the emphasis is on strengthening the ukrainian army. it does not strengthen mutual security. and that, from my point of view, russian patience may will not expire immediately, but in the foreseeable future, and i would not rule out that russia will have to apply everything. what did kitchen tell me? for the fire to you. he said if russia does it. then she will suffer very serious, very large losses. and i told him that this is possible, but we must understand that in this case the collective west may suffer very great losses, because not only russia may turn out to be stronger than someone , no one imagines it, especially that the world is very unstable, that america is

and as you know, especially after henry kissinger, i go way back in history to after steve jobsk i goants to go into the way back machine. >> walter isaacson, always such a pleasure. amazing book. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. touriss tourists that turn into scientists. tourist taking photos that are analyzed by ai. so researchers c can help life underwater flourish. ♪ somedays, i cover up becse of my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. now i feel free to bare my skin, thanks to skyrizi. ♪(uplifting music)♪ ♪nothing is everything♪ i'm celebrating my clearer skin... my way. with skyrizi, 3 out of 4 people achieved 90% clearer skin at 4 months. in another study, most people had 90% clearer skin, even at 5 years. and skyrizi is just 4 doses a year, after 2 starter doses. serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or a lower ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms, had a vaccine, or plan to. thanks to clearer skin with skyrizi - this is my moment. there's nothing on

i want to be at the intersection of science and humanity and technology and especially after henry kissingerin history. there is a part of me now that wants to go into the way back machine. >> walter isaacson, always such a pleasure. amazing book. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. xed? safelite makes it easy. >> tech vo: you can schedule in just a few clicks. and we'll come to you with a replacement you can trust. >> man: looks great. >> tech: that's service on your time. schedule now. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ mashed potato lovers. your day has come. indulge in the rich, creamy classic bob evans mashed potatoes. farm fresh potatoes blended with real milk and butter for that homemade taste. with the delicious taste bob evans is known for. bring home the warm comfort of mashed potatoes today. there are some things that go better... together. burger and fries... soup and salad. like your workplace benefits and retirement savings. with voya, considering all your financial choices together can help you make smarter dec

reminds me of the 1970s the days of henry kissinger what bret baier is really doing is curing the positionsther and to comment and try to move ahead. there are some severe issues that are still left. the saudi's want to security guarantee like a defense treaty. they want permission to develop nuclear weapons if i run those nuclear. the israelis want to keep their china contract that runs their main ports. the israelis have given $2 billion to a chinese company to manage their main ports. there are a lot of issues so up in the air. i could recite a few more for you if you have all night. this is an amazing performance by fox news and frankly i hope murdochs and some kind of thank you letter to bret baier for what he has done. diplomatically as well as in the world of journalism. >> you mention china's is roads into israel but china is making inroads into saudi arabia as well. >> yes. yes, much more so. they persuaded the saudi's to spend many billions to buy a data center using while way equipment you remember it's the company that tried to stop it around the world because it function as an

i think that's in fact what henry kissinger, along with his counterparts in the 1970s decided. if we don't get to that point, we need to get a some point where military aggression is off the table for that purpose. secondly, there have to be economic rules of the road we can all agree to. what we are seeing right now are practices which my constituents, mike's constituents, i think the majority of the american people will not tolerate. those will continue to destabilize this relationship. i think that is what it feels so fragile right now, because of something like 80% of americans view china not as a friend, not as a competitor, but sometimes as an adversary. and when you see that, you kind of are on a road to a bad place. and so we have to change that fundamentally. michael: how do you go about doing that? you bring them into the international system, they will begin to abide by international rules and norms. do you think we can compel them to do that through sanctions, through economic sanctions? is it true selective decoupling, or is it through some overwhelming changes of

a message from the ukrainian side that president zelsky and his advisers met in new york with henry kissingerh russia. before the start of this conflict, i was against ukraine’s membership in nato, because i was afraid that it would trigger exactly the process that we are seeing now, now that the process has reached such a level, the idea of ​​a neutral ukraine in such conditions is no longer makes sense, russia is trying to destroy the world order, violate and replace international law, the un charter, imposing its own conspiracy theory and interpretation of the rules. well, i certainly would have preferred to hear kisinger's words. chief of staff to president zelski, but actually this is similar to things that kissinger recently said, and when i hear this kind of statement, if this statement was actually made, and we also don’t know the context, but i would immediately ask this question, andronik: first, if at the moment... the question of if ukraine's admission to nato would be more expedient to decide differently, then my first question is from whose point of view, because maybe from nato

more contemporary, innovative figures of our age, like steve jobs, jennifer, jennifer doudna or henry kissinger. you can bet the result will be a fascinating, revealing, comprehensive and vividly told book. walter's take on elon musk is certainly all that and the story turned out to be even more than walter bargained for when he set out a couple of years ago to do the biography. back then, walter thought he'd be writing mainly about moscow's technological trailblazer, a leader in the fields of electric vehicles and private space exploration. then came musk's impulsive purchase of twitter and his central role in providing ukraine with satellite communiques and links during the war with russia. and the questions and controversies about musk only grew. all of which has enhanced the timeliness and importance of walter's in-depth portrait of musk and of the demons that drive him now, predictably. walter himself has come in for some criticism about what he decided to put in the book or leave out, or the extent to which he refrains from judging musk. legitimate questions have been raised about both th

here is richard nixon and henry kissinger and jimmy carter think it's a senior jimmy carter gave hispeech warning against an inordinate fear of communism. ronald reagan's impulse is to turn upside down. now that i'm older it feels a little risky to me, jamie. >> i'm a big fan of the approach especially given where i am today. the moral clarity of reagan is incredibly essential here. authoritarian ultimately are incredibly fearful but they are fearful of their own citizens. when they realize democracy are resilient and united and up to the task that strikes fear into the heart of i every authoritarn leader. that's ultimately what reagan understood why the speech was so powerful. in terms of what the president t says in a setting like this in terms of preserving the moral clarity the vision then you can debate the tactic and they diplomacy and the negotiation which reagan engaged in the interagency process happening earlier i wrote my share of speeches for him all the pulses i held in washington ultimately who they work for on whether it's the president or the senator they are in that