this is when they talk about the henry viii powers, those not used since henry viii's time.l us about it? the idea about the repeal bill is when we brexit, all european law will be put into british law, one deal. it is an interesting way to do it. we can spend years gradually picking it apart spend years gradually picking it a pa rt after spend years gradually picking it apart after doing it in one day. mps will not get a vote on it. they are worried we will start repealing this, leaving that, without them getting a chance to consider it. they are thinking of opposing it and making trouble for it. if they can defeat the repeal bill, of course, we would have a major problem the day that brexit came. they have wedged a lot in. yes. a powerhouse! well done, both of you. we are very pleased to count them as our paper review was. but there is a lot going on behind the scenes, which we will go on to. the facts theresa may needs this lifeline from donald trump. absolutely. as you said, we will talk soon about what the germans said. she needs a lifeline. but it is not a lifeline, so

king henry viii was enabled to issue proclamations to change legislation. take primary legislation and amended or appeal it without further parliamentary scrutiny. the government says, yes, we will only do that for technical bits, we need to ta ke do that for technical bits, we need to take out the word european union here and there, don't worry about it, it will all be fine. other people are saying what about a cold wednesday afternoon when no one is watching you think this is too complicated, let's strike—out this whole page when no one is looking. i think the people in parliament, they should be able to scrutinise all pa rt should be able to scrutinise all part of the process that is one of the battles we will see. labour has already said it is threatening to vote against the bill, so the august through the politics of all this. what will see in parliament in the next couple of years, and perhaps it is where we should be, the place where we really do decide what kind of brexit we will get. if you like, it will be the battle between leave and remain, that

these are ministerial powers, the so—called henry viii law, which means that in their view they can'td sufficiently. and that's where complexity becomes controversy. so that's westminster. but as we've been hearing, the first ministers of scotland and wales are already not happy. how much power have they got? they can't stop brexit. they can't stop it. they can't veto it but they can certainly blow a raspberry in the direction of westminster, and we've seen that this week in what carwynjones, the first minister of wales, and nicola sturgeon, the first minister of scotland, have been doing, because where they do have some power is, again it's complex, they have power via what are known as legislative consent motions to be able to say, we want a say on this because some of the powers which are coming back from brussels to the uk are ones that have been handed over to the devolved administrations and they say, get a move on, we want that power in edinburgh and cardiff, not just in westminster. so you can be certain, and we've seen it already, that they will seek to be involved as much as

by henry viii powers. is that your big issues?have taken control from europe and given it to the government and there is no parliamentary discussion or control, that can't be right. we are saying that we need a different type of bill. i hope the government will hope us and a lot of this bill. we can't at the moment because it is so undemocratic. i think they should withdraw this and bring something forward. if not, we'll amend it as best we can. what is more important to you, mr mcdonnell, getting rid of the prime minister or getting out of the european union? look, the most important thing for me is about the future of the country. at the moment, the problem that we've got is that the future of our country is being held back because we have a weak or no government in power at the moment. they are in office, but not in power. you can see my point that by frustrating the brexit... oh, no, we are not... theresa may has to resign and you get the election that you want. theresa may's dever registration is more important. you are wrong

in sort of this henry viii said to each of his wives, i'm not going to give you long. >> let me say up front that i really enjoyed the book. i think it makes some important points about not just reagan isn't quite the person that we understood him to be but fdr wasn't kind of the person that he is now either in the history here is more subtle. >> it occurs to me that henry, i'm not going to do anyarguing with henry about numbers . >> he's a step knowledge us which is someone that studies elections, he's really good that, i'll leave that to you ruy. i consider math witchcraft. i'm not going to even touch it. it seems to be henry makes three basic arguments or at least the three basic arguments that the debate about this book is going to generate. the first is that reagan was less of a reaganite then a conservative, a high priest, i've used that phrase about a bunch of people in the right today. that would like to claim. the second is the gop needs to shut this cult of reagan, of this false reagan.if it's going to fix its problems and become a majority party who can do serious work area

of the day are intending doing, and what the government seems to be intending to do is to give henry viiiy workers' rights or environmental laws and we are not prepared to see that happen. the reality of that is surely that brexit will be delayed for many years while you go through the minutiae of those little bits and pieces of eu legislation. the minutiae of those little bits and pieces of eu legislationm the minutiae of those little bits and pieces of eu legislation. if we don't go through the minutiae of that legislation then potentially what could happen is gaps and loopholes appear in our legislation where we might have transposed over into uk law part of the eu legislation and we might have transposed it over in its entirety, but with references to agencies that no longer exist so the risk of not scrutinising it is that we create a lawyer ‘s bonanza in terms of the gaps that could appear in our legislation. what about those who say that the liberal democrats have a lwa ys say that the liberal democrats have always been opposed to brexit and this is just another way to scupper and o