another reporter by the name of herbert matthews help to build the legend of fidel castro. he was losing and hiding out badly beaten so what happened? while the batista government claimed castro was dead "the new york times" reporter wrote a glowing piece about castro that he is still alive and fighting and he has built an army and completely deceived with the whole notion of this romantic revolution and castro said he was a democrat and rising up to take out the military regime a glowing article and matthew wrote the personality it was easy to see them then adored him and why he caught the imagination of the use of cuba all over here was an educated dedicated fanatic and remarkable qualities of leadership so the interview helped castro as reuters pointed out by exaggerating the size of the rebel force and castro would later break how he duped "the new york times". stalin. hitler castro. "the new york times" is on the wrong side of all three. propping up or covering up the paper record that's fit to print this is important to understand because "the new york times" has not

they had a reporter herbert matthew.ld the legend of fidel castro -- castro was losing, the government that claimed that castro of the dead, matthews the "new york times" reporter wrote a glowing piece. >> castro, still alive, fighting he built an army. he was deceived this matthews but he was in love with the notion of a romantic revolution, and castro was a democrat and rising up to take up the military regime, a glowing article. matthews wrote in the article, personality of the man castro is over powering. here was an educated, dedicated fanatic, a man of ideals, and remarkable qualities of leadership. the interview helped castro, by exaggerating the size of his rebel force, castro would later brag how he duped "new york times." stalin, hitler, castro. "new york times" was on the wrong side of all three. propping up or covering up for all three the paper record, all of the news that is fit to print. "new york times." this iss important to understan. because the "new york times" has not changed ownership, it is the sam

new york times had a reporter, herbert matthew, he helped build the legend of fidel castro, he was losinga couple dozen guerrillas in mountains, hiding out, what happened. while that government the government declared castro was dead, the "new york times" reporter wrote a glowing piece that castro was still alive, and fighting and build an army, and he was in love with the notion of that romantic revolution, and he was rising up to take out the military regime. a glowing article. and matthews wrote in the article, the personality the man castro is over powering, easy to see his men adore him and caught the imagining a of out youth of cuba. so the interview helped castro as reutters pointed out, by exaggerating the size of his rebel force, and castro would later brag how he duped the "new york times," -- stalin, hitler, castro, the "new york times" was on the wrong side of all 3, covering up the paper record, all news fit to front. "new york times." this is important to understand. because the "new york times" has not changed ownership, the same family, handed down from one to the next, th