again, heresay to the whole thing. but lines 18 through 20, the sentence -- sentences that begin i asked and the next sentence begins she said. relevance no foundation, it's speculation. prejudicial. >> mr. keith? >> i think that -- i think that -- i actually don't agree with most of the objection but it's probably -- it's probably not relevant within the stream of what's being conveyed. so i think that we wouldn't oppose that. >> ok. so that is -- the objection is sustained by stipulation as to the sentence that begins "i asked" online 18 and ends with the word "career" online 20. do i have that correct? >> yep. >> thank you. >> paragraph 14. >> heresay as to the whole thing. and then the very last line which is online seven, lines two to three, the very last sentence in that beginning with the word "my" finishing with the word "do," there's no foundation. i'm sorry. was i going too fast? chairperson hur: no. >> no foundation for that and speculation. chairperson hur: mr. keith? >> this is actually relevant to show ms

>> -- heresay. >> except insofar it claims that ms. lopez's course of conduct and why she was doing what she was doing at a later time. then it's permitted under the exception of the heresay rule. even if it is heresay and for the truth of the matter it is still permitted for an expert witness to relay on these types of confidence given to a friend about the nature of the relationship. >> i would strike paragraph seven, eight and nine in their entirety. i think they're more prejudicial than probative. i think none of the statements -- i mean there, can be some foundation -- we've discussed some foundation that there is a relationship but i don't -- i don't think this is probative of what -- of the allegations and charges that we're seeking to aadjudicate. -- adjudicate. i welcome comments from the commissioners or questions for mr. keith. ok. hearing no objection, we can vote at the end, but i take it there's no objection to the sustaining of objections to seven, eight, and nine among the commissioners. >> no objection. ok. paragraph 1

jurors could actually hear witnesses describe statements from kathleen and stacy because normally heresayne making an emergency landing on a freeway. it happened in california shortly before midnight. there was traffic on the road, but the pilot was able to avoid hitting any cars. the four people on board not hurt. authorities hoping to have the plane removed bit morning rush out there in california. those are your headlines. >> brian: coming up straight ahead, 13 minutes after the hour, is the movie massacre suspect in the planning stages of an insanity defense? will it hold up with so much evidence showing he planned the attack? we'll examine. >> steve: then we finally know why senator john mccain did not pick mitt romney as his running mate four years ago. that story straight ahead what n is non-stop to seattle? just carry preparation h totables. discreet, little tubes packed with big relief. from the brand doctors recommend most by name. preparation h totables. the anywhere preparation h. four course seafood feast choose your soup salad entrée pls dessert! all just $14.99. come into r