in this case, the three hidden parties were the plaintiffs, and dred scott, herriot, their daughters, allies and lizzie. acknowledging their existence is relevant to the lawsuit. recognizing they had interests perhaps implement -- independent of and with his case reconstitutes the case in many important ways. harriett was married to drag on soil in a ceremony performed by her own master at the point he really pushed all interest in her and left the territory. it should be noted her master abandoned his obligations to provide for her. eight years and two children later, she filed suit in her own with the same day as dred the same lawyer. as lawyers and judges advanced the cases, hers was repeatedly overlooked unconsciously and on a conscious level. the clerk failed to even enter a judgment in herriot -- h arriett's case the first time it was tried. the error was noticed and cleaned up six months later at the turn of court. after that oversight, cases were consolidated. lawyers for both parties consciously stipulated her case into his agreeing the results in her case would follow the ul

alex says it's even worse when herriot repos off on the washington redskins and going off on saving ourld you feel differently if they were named the washington greasy italians? well, you just shot your argument with the greasy italian comment. and by the way, i am not greasy. and jeremiah said the thing about changing political winds as the politicians keep shifting and they can't keep up with themselves. i have no idea what you're talking about, but i agree wholeheartedly. and one thing is for certain, that he will always be made fun of, so don't be expecting harry reid to come to your defense on the senate floor. just saying. and patricia writes that you are the man, we love the show. and another says a number can write to compliment you, but thanks for giving charles payne his own fresh show. you are just a little bit hotter though, and doesn't kill charles payne. and what do you mean by a little bit? >> anyway, sometimes you sound like a 7-year-old. well, sometimes you write like . coming up next is lou dobbs. lou: it evening, everyone from a , a number of developing stories at thi

i am very happy and excited today and when i am less it, i like to think that maybe i am the herriot teachers go of the kidney transplant world and that people who read my book will see a human face on kidney sellers and herein and diplomate to see change in how the u.s. looks at living donation. for those of you who might not know what harriet beecher's airwaves, she wrote the book "uncle tom's cabin" at the time of the u.s. civil war and because of her book, she put a face on this offering is played in this house she brought the debate about slavery home to family and people feeling in the life is really like for them. that is what i hope to do with my book. i hope to bring home what it is like to be a kidney sellers and it ran. so my book is nonacademic. it not a polemic. it is a book of stories. nice. discovery in the story of the kidney sellers whom i interviewed. i'm going to do three things today. i'm going to give you a tiny bit of background on the organ crisis because without that you don't have a context for the book. then we are going to be a short book trailer that my fr