but laws in bought siena -- bosnia-herzegovina have to be approved by thebibosnian-croat . this complicates the situation. >> it is all about chicken products needing documentation for export to the eu. it is the farmers who are worst- hit. he is a bosniak who breeds poultry to supply the factory. he is frustrated. >> farmers work as hard as we can, but the state institutions do not do their job. >> the farmers feel they are getting a raw deal. he says he recently tried to get state subsidies for his farm. he says he spoke to a party official in the agricultural ministry who spelled out the terms of a written agreement. >> it says you will get your money if you divert half of the funds to the party. the other half will be years. from that, i would have had to pay 15% to the middleman. >> a clear case of corruption. he rejected the offer and instead build his new chicken breeding facility without state money. in the village, i made -- a neighbor approaches him. >> try some fresh blueberries. six euros for the pale. >> it is possible to live without corruption. we take his cl

bosnia-herzegovina still does not have a joint ministry of agriculture, but that is the only ministryan control goods to be exported. >> he and his production supervisor are angry. he is a bosniak who works for the food production business. one of the biggest products is chicken patch i -- pate. it is one of the biggest employers but the new factory is standing idle. the 10 million euro facility was meant to boost exports to neighboring croatia, but since july business has come to a crashing halt. >> every day we are getting customers asking about our products that they cannot get anymore. it was a great product at a great price. >> croatia joined the eu in july. now it is subject to import regulations, especially on food. europe insists on common controls with all trading partners including croatia. >> it did not prepare everything. he did not prepare papers or the stamp that will guarantee our products are ready for the european community. that is why. >> sarajevo, the bosnian capital. the hom city is home to three different ethnic factions. do they plan to ignore rules that apply t

we struck milosevic twice in bosnia and herzegovina. both times, we continued to talk with him. we want to punish bashar, but not talking to him and not making a decisive strike , what is the effect of all of that? >> what happens when the syrians resort to chemical weapons again? if the net result of this strike is that it does not dissuade them from using chemical weapons, what do you do? what is the next step? >> with this extra time that he has bought, he is reportedly moving his weapons, his material into civilian areas. the consequences of that -- >> so there is no plan for now. at least not a visible one for what happens to lyrically. -- politically. but we have a tweak here. if obama keeps her crass knitting and doing nothing, he risks and taken lightly by allies. successive french governments, not just francois hollande, his predecessor nicolas sarkozy and his foreign minister both said assad should go. is it the west that will be taken lightly by allies? >> i am not sure all the west. it will depend. i think like david cameron, he voted himself and exit from the crisis

herzegovina -->> before i run out of time, could you respond about putin? >> i would interpret his question -- his comments as that the g-20, the president and he will have a conversation. there may be a road forward where russia would consider not locking actions. i would quickly we say to everybody here --canada, stephen harper said we should take action. denmark, france, poland, turkey. all have suggested the united states should take action and would be prepared to take action with us. this is a building response and i think other countries understand the moment. >> we are going to go now to mr. tom marino of pennsylvania. >> thank you chairman. secretary hegel, if you could tell me or tell us, who are the bad guys? or maybe put it this way. who are our allies? who are the good guys in syria? >> you are referring to the opposition, i assume? >> who are they? >> we have covered some of this ground. again, you are looking at various groups that are part of the opposition. as secretary kerry noted, under the general there are groups who have one motive and

and somalia, and bosnia, herzegovina come in almost every deployment, the haitian earthquake and others. there's a whole discipline to my former partners big into this stuff involving usaid, state department and the first multilateral organizations and overseas governments around just this issue. >> the commonwealth of virginia has invested emergency preparedness dollars in telehealth and reconnect all the hospitals, probably almost every hospital in virginia is connected. we test regulate for disaster preparedness so we can communicate and manage and triage together. you think about it also, look at the data that can be mined in terms of the surveillance. pharmacy utilization in terms of identification of outbreaks, anthrax. other outbreaks. >> disease surveillance is the low-hanging fruit in many ways were both held telehealth and electronic else records and interoperable health records because you don't have some of the same basis and other issues that you otherwise faced with competing interests in very slow patients around disease surveillance, and community care records and that s