, although it should be recalled that hetman skoropadskyi wrote in his memoirs in the 19th year thatut crimea is like a body without legs, and he actually believed that ukraine it is doomed to conflict with its state if it seizes crimea, because crimea needs ukraine, and ukraine needs crimea. and we feel this today more than ever, and only since last year , two more pawns of ukraine were seized from the territory of crimea, and the occupiers entered kherson oblast, zaporozhye and more

, let me remind you that hetman skoropadskyi wrote in his memoirs back in the 19th year that ukraine without crimea is like a body without legs, and it was actually considered that ukraine is doomed to conflict with its state if it seizes crimea, because crimea is a need for ukraine, and ukraine needs crimea. and today we feel it more than ever, and only with last year, two other regions of ukraine were seized from the territory of crimea, and the occupiers came to kherson region and the occupiers from occupied crimea came to zaporozhye region. and over a thousand rockets flew from the territory of crimea in a year. that is, we see that russia is using crimea as a springboard for further aggression on the territory of ukraine, accordingly , the issue of security requires that crimea be returned to the legal field of ukraine and that the sovereignty of ukraine is restored to it, that crimea is economic security, why has crimea never given large revenues to the ukrainian budget but uh, ukraine is an export-oriented state for ukraine, a sea route to the world is very important. and afte

, the students should remind that hetman skoropadskyi wrote in his memoirs in the 19th year that ukrainewithout legs, and he actually believed that ukraine was doomed to conflict its state if it seizes crimea, because crimea needs ukraine, and ukraine does not need crimea. and we feel this today more than ever, and only since last year , two other regions of ukraine were seized from the territory of crimea, and occupiers entered kherson oblast and occupiers from occupied crimea entered zaporozhye oblast and more than 1,000 years have flown over the territory of crimea. that is, we see that russia is using crimea as a bridgehead for further aggression on the territory of ukraine. accordingly , the issue of security requires that crimea be returned to the legal field of ukraine and be the restored sovereignty of ukraine is criminal security, why yes, crimea has never given large revenues to the ukrainian budget, but ukraine is an export-oriented state for ukraine, a very important sea route to the world and after russia illegally seized crimea, we immediately felt the problems on the azov

, let me remind you that hetman skoropadskyi wrote in his memoirs back in the 19th year that ukraineis like a body without legs and he actually considered ukraine doomed to conflict with its state if it seizes crimea , because crimea needs ukraine, and ukraine does not need crimea. other pawns of ukraine and the occupiers came to the kherson region and teams from the occupied crimea came to zaporozhye and more than 1,000 people flew in a year from the territory of the crimea. that is, we see that russia is using the crimea as a springboard for further aggression on the territory of ukraine. accordingly , the security issue requires that the crimea be returned to the legal field of ukraine and the restored sovereignty of ukraine, but besides this , there is also economic security, why did crimea never give large revenues to the ukrainian budget , but ukraine is an export-oriented state for ukraine, a sea route to the world is very important. after russia illegally seized crimea, we immediately felt the problems on azov, then it actually blocked exports to the azov territories of ukrai