that's why i'm supporting hillary clinton. hillary clinton is honest and trustworthy and -- >> cut. what's the problem? >> i can't say these words. >> what do you mean? >> i just don't believe what i'm saying. >> you're an actress. >> i'm not that good of an actress. honest and trustworthy. give me a break. make america number one was responsible for the content of this advertising. >> okay? the ad was sponsored by the beat crooked hillary pac backed by robert mercer. breitbart run by bannon features the same still video from the video featured by the russian troll account which shared the ad and their tweet was then retweeted by michael flynn. what does this show you? there's a synergy that takes existing content and then amplifies it, tries to expand its reach, in this case to try to demobilize african-american voters. more demobilization attempts. sanders supporters. sanders obviously didn't say that. and stein. i find stein of all of these pieces the most interesting, because once you look back, things become more obvious than they are when you are actually working in the campai

what people also don't here is julian assange doesn't like hillary clinton because hillary clinton wantedhim prosecuted for which he considered his misuse of national security data when he released some of the other material earlier. you would think the press would be saying wikileaks run by julian assange, who doesn't like hillary clinton. no. you would think they would say wikileaks, passing russian hacked content through. they didn't. we would interpret the content differently if we kept the tie to the source. something might say i like julian assange. i like russians. which time they might be more prudent of the content. some people might ask, why are they doing this? what is of interest in this? should some of this be discounted on the scripts because there's nothing comparable been done with donald trump. this is a like press leaking with a pestle fight anything it can from anybody and try to get out. this is asymmetric come happening only one side and it is taught to go. it is being used in this case to blunt the effects of "access hollywood" tape. which it effectively did that by

maybe she will get some women mad over hillary clinton having lost. >> ladies and gentlemen, the next the united states. >> i was hired to work on the obama campaign after hillary conceded, and we were watching sarah palin give her convention speech. >> before i became governor, i was mayor of my hometown, and since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves. a smalltown mayor is sort of like a community organizer, except that you have actual responsibilities. >> she did what hillary clinton could not do and that was deliver a precise attack without looking like a bitch, and that was scary to us. >> you know what they say the difference is between a hockey mom and a pitbull? lipstick. >> that's one of the best convention speeches i've ever seen. mccain, who had been eight points down to obama with no possibility of turning it around, by the time sarah palin finished speaking he was five points up. the campaign announced it has raised $8 million online. that's just been since sarah palin gave that speec

and they never told the judge where that research actually came from and it was funded by hillary clinton her team. why isn't robert mueller looking at that, mercedes? >> frankly as a federal prosecutor, we represented clients in the throes of a federal investigation. we don't know what maneuvering this mueller is doing for the background. but to your point, he should be looking at everything. anything that can establish innocence and anything that can lead to further investigation and information. but to ignore information -- trish require's trying to prove someone on trump's team is talking to the russians. but he's not looking at that other stuff. i feel as an america we all deserve answers. i just want to know why the fisa warrants are based on opposition research. this is a slipper irslope for americans and our privacy. >> that's why there seems to be such a dichotomy here. why aren't we going down that road? let's go back to what this is supposed to be. this is supposed to be an investigation on whether there was foreign interference in our'' election. how are we not looking into fi

hillary clinton all of or attorneys got immunity. fbi going after cohen and seizing his records and uses this pre-text of russian collusion. a lot of headlines today were about how the russian collusion story is falling apart. that michael cohen went to prague and traded money for information. that's falling apart. the investigation was done differently than the way hillary clinton was investigated. >> republicans are going to continue to say, hillary clinton was treated unfairly. i believe that molly and other fair-minded americans would say, they just want equal protection. michael cohen did a lot of bad stuff. michael cohen did a ton of bad stuff. not related to the president and some of it related to the president and the campaign. he pleaded guilty. he is going to prison. i know there are a lot of republicans that say hillary clinton should be gone back after. drive the bus back around and look at hillary clinton again and do it right this time. take the findings of the report and do it right with hillary clinton. she should be

and they never told the judge where that research actually came from and it was funded by hillary clinton and her team. why isn't robert mueller looking at that, mercedes? >> frankly as a federal prosecutor, we represented clients in the throes of a federal investigation. we don't know what maneuvering this mueller is doing for the background. but to your point, he should be looking at everything. anything that can establish innocence and anything that can lead to further investigation and information. but to ignore information -- trish require's trying to prove someone on trump's team is talking to the russians. but he's not looking at that other stuff. i feel as an america we all deserve answers. i just want to know why the fisa warrants are based on opposition research. this is a slipper irslope for americans and our privacy. >> that's why there seems to be such a dichotomy here. why aren't we going down that road? let's go back to what this is supposed to be. this is supposed to be an investigation on whether there was foreign interference in our'' election. how are we not looking int

comey told them it was strong who helped him draft the memo about hillary clinton. mey says it's hard to believe strzok was in league with clinton and against trump. comey said that he had confidence in the fisa process and the warrant to surveil carter page. though when asked to sign off on a major political campaign, he said he didn't know. he said he felt president trump asked him to halt the probe during their february 2017 meeting and said that's why he wrote this memorandum. he said president obama did not ask him to investigate the trump campaign. this isn't over. comey appears before the committees on december 17. so many conservatives aren't satisfied with this investigation. republican florida representative matt gaetz says the way the committees handled this reminds him of the death rattle of republican oversight. judge jeanine: my next guest had a front-row seat for james comey's defendant money. congressman jim jordan. you were in the room at the time. 245 times comey who was the head of the fbi in one of the most of important cases in the nairn can hist

mueller also appointed a woman named jeannie rae who served as an attorney for hillary clinton. at's right, at the clinton foundation. now this looks really, really bad and it's only the tip of the iceberg because mueller literally filled his team of so-called investigators with major democratic donors, no republicans. and they registered democrats but zero republicans. at this point, robert mueller mae has well have hired maxine waters and elizabeth warren. he's not even trying to appear fair and it's no wonder that from the very beginning this investigation centered around one man and one man only and that is it your president, donald trump. it's the opposite of how our justice system is supposed to work and that brings us to part two of our witch hunt analysis. they investigated people and they found crimes. in america we are supposed to investigate crimes and find the perpetrators and sadly here we are investigating a man not a crime. look at michael flynn, look at papadopoulos, manna fort, paul manafort, they share one connection. flynn and papadopoulos pled guilty to proces

was the dirt on hillary clinton forthcoming? >>> it was the e-mail that set off a chain of events leading to the meeting. just a few sentences long, but every word subject to intense scrutiny, and speculation. >> would you read it to us? >> sure. good morning. ammon just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting. the crown prosecutor of russia met with his father this morning. and in that meeting offered to provide the trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate hillary and her dealings with russia and would be very useful to your father. >> the father, of course, then candidate donald trump. and the e-mail's author, an unlikely man to be in the center of what would become a political firestorm. rob goldstone sat down with nbc news sin that mcfadden, to tell his story. >> you have been called a wide variety of names over the past year. useful idiot. dunce. clown. bonkers. puppet of the kremlin. sinister. any of that fit? >> i've been called much more than that as we

if critics of the trump administration question about that comparatively to hillary clinton and what are seeking, what is your answer? >> well, frankly it highlights the egregious nature of what mrs. clinton did when you compare what happened with of uncle trump where he had some emails about government business being sent on her private account before and after her work at the white house, emails by all accounts they were captured and preserved, which is in fact what they probably need to be, there is no legal prohibition on using personal email for government business now. the difference is that hillary clinton, specifically set off an email system to make sure no emails would be captured by the government and provided to investigators. as long as she had anything to do with it until as the court highlighted, judicial watch caught them. >> harris: there is another difference and i wonder if this investigation could get to the bottom of, will we ever know how many and how it is destroyed, all stories about taking out into the woods, and they attacked a period and the server was destr

how's that anything different than hillary clinton's team originating on opposition research? hiring a firm and then hired for, christopher steele, the british spy who then had his foreign sources, russian sources, actually, to on donald trump. i looking into that dossier? some of them have been wrong? this is such an utter distraction. it is a disservice to our country. i cannot understand what they're trying to prove here must they find touchup hired a hacker to illegally obtained john podesta 's emails and turn them over to wikileaks. maybe they got something. stretch. i am not sure what mr. miller is trying to prove this investigation has been going on and on. i do not think he knows either. joining me now is brad blakeman who were done several presidential campaigns along with former hillary clinton campaign advisor. talk to me about the opposition research part of this. he likes politics to offer business that goes on to that opposition research staff. besides do this? >> absolutely. there cannot be a football game if you do not have an offenses and defenses team. to kno

i voted for hillary clinton. ed -- i would've written a book called the case against impeaching him and clinton. the frame errors of the constitution set out criteria for impeachment. you have to be convicted based on evidence of either bribery, treason or other high crimes and misdemeanors and at least at the moment i have not seen sufficient evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors to call for the impeachment of the president, who i voted against. i made the same case when bill clinton was impeached. i did not think they had sufficient constitutional basis for impeaching him. i'm a neutral objective nonpartisan civil libertarian who analyzes constitutional and legal issues without regard to whether it helps or hurts republicans or democrats. that is what i will continue to do. dedication in your book. this book is respectfully dedicated to an endangered species you write, general -- genuine civil libertarians who pass the shoe on the other foot test. guest: simply a variation of the golden rule. what i ask of a

they called for hillary clinton's impeachment before the election. republicans swore that the day she was elected they would move to her impeachment. i would have written the case against the hillary clinton impeachment book. to make the point that i would have written that case, my publisher came up with an alternate cover. the case against impeaching hillary clinton. i would have written essentially the same book. it would've dealt with emails and benghazi and uranium but the legal criteria would have been the same. i think i passed the shoe on the other foot test and iqs many of my critics, friends and colleagues alike of not passing the test. allowing partisanship to intrude on constitutional analysis. one of my colleagues was firm when it was being impeached that a president could not be indicted while sitting in office and now that the president is front instead of clinton my colleague changed his mind. he saw the truth of reality and now believes a president can be impeached. my views have been consistent over time. if consistency is the hobgo

was the dirt on the democratic party, and hillary clinton forthcoming? as i was aware. i decided i would view the opportunity to check my e-mails to sit there, but to keep half an ear open. my eyes were definitely open. because although i thought, well, i don't really know about this subject, i'm smart enough to, i will be able to spot if there is a change in body language. >> goldstone said he noticed the mood deflate as the attorney talked about sanctions and the magnitski act. it didn't sound like dirt on hillary clinton. >> jared kushner next to me looked like he was becoming more and more agitated as the attorney continued and at what point jared said i have no idea what you're talking about, could you possibly refocus. >> and the attorney started again. >> then she started talking about how unfair it was for the adoption of russian children by americans. then my ears picked up. because i was like, what is she talking about? why is, what's adoption got to do with any of this? >> don jr. got up and said i don't really know why you would address this

, to loretta lynch, a friend of hillary clinton's, and james comey. out interactions that james comey might have had with loretta lynch, and lynch with bill clinton and issues about the e-mails. they seem obsessed with the e-mails and they want to prosecute hillary clinton, and i think they've gotten so intoxicated with lock her up, that's all they can think of, is lock her up. the president asked his attorney general maybe a month ago to investigate and bring criminal charges against james comey and hillary clinton. so what do they do, they bring james comey before the committee. they ask questions about hillary clinton that this is their last time that they can get a bite on that bone that they have been chewing on for two years. >> if you were to compare james comey's public testimony versus this closed door testimony, what was his tone, what was his cadence, how did he do? >> james comey is a very intelligent, very organized individual. he did not differ any from his testimony he's given in public or from his book. he said there was no bias that wa

we already know barack obama emailed hillary clinton. >> right. >> dan: on her personal email accountck obama must realize this was not a government email. this is just -- >> he thinks people are stupid and they buy into what he is saying oh he never knew anything about her email that was unauthorized and unsecured and private. he was using a pseudonym to email her back and forth. also went on national television and said she never jeopardy died national security how could he know that unless comey is lying that he didn't tell the president information about that. the most important part is obama went on national television and said not only does she not jeopardize national security but that she was nearly careless. that's what peter strzok and lisa page used to sanitize comey's findings in the exoneration statement any used barack obama's terminology to clear hillary clinton. it wouldn't have been possible if hillary clinton was prosecuted for email scandal that barack obama would have had to give some type of deposition on it given his obvious involvement given that he eagle mailed

even though he defeated hillary clinton. ton part of hillary clinton, not necessarily the hillary part. we're going to take a pause here. stick around, because then we get to have a little bit of fun. it's a new year. you have to make some predictions. we'll share ours in 2019 and get abused on social media for all the predictions, next. on social the predictions, next. from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy. and last year, i earned $36,000 in cash back. which i used to offer health insurance to my employees. what's in your wallet? with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. so even when she grows up, she'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only with expedia. select hotels to your existing trip. if your moderate to severeor crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio®, the only biologic developed and appr

the hillary clinton thing.ares that hillary clinton paid for it and it was composed by a guy who admitted he would do anything to stop trump, meaning he would lie, which is what the dossier was. >> that's a familiar line, isn't it, greg? it has quite the ring to it since mrs. clinton herself used it. unbelievable. of course, the leaking, lying comey only cares about james comey and whatever narrative it is he wants to promote, including his primary job of covering up for mrs. clinton. so he's going to say whatever it is that promotes his own agenda and her coverup. absolutely appalling. >> and, madison, that's not only appalling, but he lied to the fisa court using exclusively the dossier, which he admits he hadn't verified. he deceived the fisa judges by concealing the fact that it was paid for by hillary clinton and the democrats. i'm willing to bet that the fisa judges would have wanted to know that vital tidbit of information that comey concealed. >> it's disingenious at the very least. of course he knows b

its own lawyers said that donors were made promises of quid pro quo favors from hillary clinton. e was a culture of non-compliance. not wanting to complay with the law. they said bill clinton's personal interest with the foundation posed a grave threat to the foundation itself. these are not republicans. these are lawyers hired by the clinton foundation to find out what was going on wrong. these investigators assemble all of this evidence. they go and interview the current cfo of the clinton foundation in 2016. they take him out to dinner or lunch in new york. are there problems? here according to their memo, after they met with him, kessel made several claims. he can't control bill clinton. people are trying to stop him from mingling personal business with the foundation. he makes the most provocative statement saying i know where all of the bodies are buried in the clinton foundation. this give this to the justice department of donald trump in october 2017. in early 2018 they were called by the fbi at little rock and provide the evidence to them. the main apparatus, the fbi and

and they want the derogatory information i have on hillary clinton. they didn't like my back to on why the clinton foundation is a scam. they don't want that. they want me to go down for throwing the elections. russia must think we lost our mind in this country. trish: russia is getting what they wanted. we are in a divided state. we are double r scwowbling -- we are squabbling amongst ourselves. >> the justice department this control of the politically motivated criminals. the below deal i was offered was a criminal plea deal where i had to swear i knowingly and willingly gave misleading information to the prosecutors. that's why i refused to do that. i think my next two years will be spent before democratic committees. they don't pay for me to produce these documents. three days after christmas i have got to produce all this stuff. they can take a hike. trish: thank you again. this just breaking right here. new tonight, former national security advisor michael flynn has no idea if he'll need to serve jail time for lying to authorities. a judge postp

interviewed hillary clinton. didn't take notes, didn't record it. that the members of congress got out of comey. they didn't ask her about bill clinton's meeting with loretta lynch. they didn't ask her about the bleach bit. the questions that anybody would ask her were not asked by peter strzok and recall that lisa page said to him be careful, she is going to be our new boss. she said she should win the election 100 million to 0 before he interviews her. >> bill: from your piece quote number two. comey, now leading the charge against flynn from the sidelines you write, admits with bravado broke the rules. and far worse gave hillary clinton all the breaks in the world with just a scolding and setting up secret surveillance of the trump campaign for reasons still unclear. >> bill: i will add on your piece not once -- not once you write did new york state officials display any curiosity about a potential wrongdoing. whatever the clintons did was good enough for them end quote. >> you see that with the foundation and neither the new york state attorney

i cast my ballot for hillary clinton in the general election.rs in the primary. and i think that we live in a binary two-party system and that a vote for anybody other than donald trump or hillary clinton in the general election was a vote that in my opinion didn't necessarily count. it was not a true participation in democracy. i think third parties are something that could be viable one day. folks haven't done the work to make a third party viable. but the russians didn't just meddle in 2016, don. we know they have been -- they were around in 2017, that they tried their hand in 2018 and they will in fact be back in 2019 and 2020. so the question is what is the federal government and states across the country, what are we doing to shore up our elections, our cybersecurity, and what kind of safeguards are folks like facebook and twitter putting in place to make sure there are platforms cannot be weaponized in the same vein again? >> it's interesting, you said you had no idea. and i don't think many people across the country or most people knew t

john edwards was far ahead, followed by hillary clinton.o you think beto o'rourke has his toe in the water here for iowa? >> yeah, look, if i was beto o'rourke and i saw that poll, i would say, you know what, i got to do this, jump in this race. good news also for joe biden and bernie sanders. joe biden has 99% name id in iowa, doesn't have a lot of room to grow. that was a good poll. it is not a great poll for elizabeth warren, had 80% name id, not a good place for her. it is still a very good poll for people like beto o'rourke and of course this is largely based on name id at this point, dana. there is a lot of room for candidates to grow and a lot can happen between now and the iowa caucuses. >> seems early to be talking about iowa. why are we talking about this? matt, this starts in february, just five weeks from now, you'll see the candidates going to

he defeated hillary clinton, but in some ways he defeated the clinton part of hillary clinton.t. stick around. because then we get to have a little bit of fun. not that this wasn't fun. but it's a new year. you have to make some predictions. we'll share ours in 2019 and get abused on social media for all the predictions, next. giggling/) gotcha! (man) ah! (girl) nooooooooooooo! (man) nooooo! (girl) nooooo... (vo) quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker, and is two times more absorbent than the leading ordinary brand. (man and pirate girl) ahoy! (laughing) (vo) bounty, the quicker picker upper. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. >>

they are trying to undermine hillary clinton by trying to promote jill stein. this was a huge trove of data handed over by twitter, facebook, and let's look at the numbers. they posted some 10 million tweets, 116,000 instagram posts. 61,000 facebook posts and 1,000 videos. on top of that, there were 44 video accounts that collected around 600,000 followers. even though the reports of those doing the reports got this trove of data, they said it was the bare minimum that the companies could have handed over. one of the major headlines here is the activity and malign activity they did in targeting the african-american population. in deploying what are suppression tactics on the black community and they are fear mongering on the right. a lot of this happened on the social networks. these reports are saying that the ira actively tried to recruit assets to do things that they want them to do. particularly they say within the african-american community. there is a christian facebook group and if you have a sex addiction, you can call this line. that would open people

how's that anything different than hillary clinton's team originating on opposition research?g a firm and then hired for, christopher steele, the british spy who then had his foreign sources, russian sources, actually, to on donald trump. i looking into that dossier? some of them have been wrong? this is such an utter distraction. it is a disservice to our country. i cannot understand what they're trying to prove here must they find touchup hired a hacker to illegally obtained john podesta 's emails and turn them over to wikileaks. maybe they got something. stretch. i am not sure what mr. miller is trying to prove this investigation has been going on and on. i do not think he knows either. joining me now is brad blakeman who were done several presidential campaigns along with former hillary clinton campaign advisor. talk to me about the opposition research part of this. he likes politics to offer business that goes on to that opposition research staff. besides do this? >> absolutely. there cannot be a football game if you do not have an offenses and defenses team. to know what

but hillary clinton one.she tried to move for the left to appeal to the sander scampered that did work although they thought it would come and donald trump was elected president of the united states and the american dream still has some life left in it. but it's good to keep in mind about the courts of ronald reagan but tickled the one i'm about to repeat which is that freedom is always but a generation away from extinction. if you look at this generation where dinner with now maybe with something to be worried about. all after paul tells us that millennials you socialism favorably and capitalism less favorably. bernie sanders, the majority of his support came from millennials. as i said the democrats have seized on this, whether it's cory booker or kamala harris or elizabeth warren, clearly bernie sanders for this the young lady that won the primary for congress in new york. they are admitting that there are socialist. it's no longer something they're trying to hide. socialism, democrat, aggressive have beco

before election day he indicated that he had found a new source of e-mails private e-mails that hillary clinton had sent out and then he had to inspect them to see if there was anything damaging or incriminating this really was met with a lot of consternation on the part of the clinton campaign and the democrats what was he trying to do to her and then shortly before the election he announced that they had looked at these e-mails and there was nothing there nothing to take action on and that produced an angry at reaction from republicans who said he's covering up for hillary clinton this is all intensely partisan and is that intense partisanship as you call it likely to worsen with the new congress taking their seats in january. i would suspect so because it would be a democratic house a republican controlled senate and of course donald trump in the white house everything in washington is now partisan and the f.b.i. investigation of the russian the possible russian collusion in two thousand and sixteen and the hillary clinton e-mails those are the two issues that are most likely to trigger an i

>> house lawmakers pressed lynch on the june 2016 arizona tarmac meeting with bill clinton days before hillaryn'say fbi interview. about her unsecured personal server for government business. both lynch and clinton insisted the discussion was not political. the former fbi director later claimed his boss' tarmac meeting with a driving force in his decision to hold a public press event where he described how hillary clinton mishandled classified information and comey recommended against criminal charges. reaction's to lynch's testimony today dividedcr along political lines. >> good faith effort for her to make the record clear but the record is indicating that she hadn't recused herself from the clinton case and yet she found herself, as far as i can tell, finding out that the fbi director wasn't going to prosecute when you all saw on tv. >> i can't get into exact questions and answers. it's nothing different than the past questions and answers about the email investigation and obviously the events that she has been involved with nothing new. again, it's probably -- i expect there to be a lot of

it was funded by hillary clinton and her team. why isn't robert mueller looking at that mercedes? >> mainly because frankly as a federal prosecutor and we have representative clients in the throes of a federal investigation, it gets much bigger. we don't know whatve maneuvering mr. mueller is doing in the background of frankly to your point he should be looking at everything. he should be looking at anything that could establish innocence,, anything that could lead to further investigation and further investigation but to ignore information -- trish: he's trying to prove someone on trump's team was talking to russians which apparently they were talking a little bit or at least exchanging contacts that got michael cohen and so much trouble but he's not looking at the other stuff. i feel as ani american we all deserve answers and i just want to know why it is fisa warrant based on opposition research. this is a slippery slope for americans and -- . >> that's where there seems to be such a dichotomy here. why are we going down that road? let's go back to what this is supposed to be.

bernie sanders does well in the poll and hillary clinton does not.eople saying they feel unfavorable than favorable. bernie sanders is still ranking quite high in our poll. the second thing is we asked whether iowa caucus goers thought hillary clinton would add something to the race. by an overwhelming majority said she would be more to detract. iowans know hillary clinton and they said no, thank you, to the idea of her running at this point. >> could we put this into context with the importance of these numbers. for example, at this stage ahead of the 2016 race, president trump then civilian donald trump was barely even registering back in 2006. john edwards led by a large margin and obama was in third place behind hillary clinton. what does this poll tell us ahead of 2020? >> one of the things that it tells us is that at this early stage, what you begin to get is a sense of what's the natural landscape? what are the opportunities for the lesser known candidates. nothing is locked in. the best example of that is that our poll around this time four y

i think this hillary clinton e-mail investigation is going to fully run its course in the house. next congress, we're going to take up some of the themes brought up in yesterday's memos from southern district of new york and the mueller investigation, namely how did people like michael cohen or paul manafort help the president connect with russians in an attempt to meddle in our democracy, and how do we prevent that happening again. >> won't that be with the mueller probe what the findings will do, that x, y, z happened, these are the players involved, then it would be up to congress to do something with it? >> correct. exactly. my expectation is that hopefully the mueller investigation goes unimpeded, and that's of great importance now. we still are not in the majority. >> you're still worried it is vulnerable? >> yes, exactly, at least for the next month. after we take the majority, my expectation is that mr. mueller will complete his investigation, produce a report, then it will be up to congress to act on that report. >> have there been rumblings, are you and your colleagues

we're talking about information surrounding quid pro quo promises while hillary clinton was secretary of state and the co-mingling of funds with the foundation and the clinton's private money and more, including one glaring example when hillary clinton was secretary of state, remember this deal signed off on sending 20% of our uranium, the foundational material for nuclear weapons to vladimir putin. by the way, this occurred as the clinton foundation was receiving millions and millions of dollars from the chairman of uranium one and the banks involved. we knew putin had an operative inside the united states. william campbell was a spy within that network. identifying money laundering and extortion. guess what? robert mueller was the fbi director. putin got the foot hold into our uranium market. the deal happened and nobody got in trouble. the clintons got their money, the kickback for the foundation in terms of millions of dollars. tonight an investigation we now know as of yesterday is on going. i said over and over, it's time in america to care about our constitutional republic, tha

what exactly did president obama know about hillary clinton's deleted emails and when? fbi director james comey grilled about that behind closed doors, comey's answers show he takes the responsible and she is live next. a newborn baby getting into the holiday spirit. the adorably ugly christmas letter party going viral. - [voiceover] this is an urgent message from the international fellowship of christians and jews. there is an emergency food crisis for elderly holocaust survivors in the former soviet union. - this is a fight against time. what we're dealing with is coming out, meeting someone who's 85, 90 years old, can't get around, has no food, has no water, and just wants to give up and die. and that's where we come in. we are called to comfort these people, to be a blessing to their lives. - [voiceover] for just $25, we'll rush an emergency survival package to help one desperate elderly person for a month. call right now. - [eckstein] call the number on your screen. - in ukraine, there's no supper network. they don't have food cards or neighbors that come in to hel

hillary clinton, while you want to bring that up and constantly bring up hillary clinton, she actuallyst votes of anybody to ever run for president of the united states of america. number one being barack obama, number two being barack obama, number three was hillary clinton. let's set that aside. the other thing about it is, i love how we like to pick on nancy pelosi when chuck schumer was also in the room. chuck schumer also chastised donald trump to his face. he said if we're still talking about the president winning north dakota and indiana, the president is losing. he gave it back to him as much as what nancy pelosi did. >> listen, every -- wa we're forgetting here is john boehner, who mike you and i like and paul ryan who you and i like, were had a very difficult time getting elected speakers and had rebels in their caucus, an the freedom caucus in their case who didn't want to so the for them. they had actual challenges and people voting for other folks. nancy pelosi is con agglomerating her power and going to have the votes necessary to be speaker. by the time january 3rd rolls

and when we look at equal justice under law, this is something him, hillary clinton, and several others don't want to respect anymore. it's a pivotal part of our country. and they should not be held above the law. it shows that many of these people have been in corrupt d.c. for way too long. and that's another thing that needs to be changed that our president has been degreesing. >> he cleared hillary clinton by contorting the facts. then he steals government documents and conveys them to somebody unauthorized to trigger the special council. he continually gives false and leading and evasive statements. do you think he'll ever be held accountable? >> he must be, greg, if americans can ever have any faith of the department of justice or fbi again. >> and don't forget, he agreed to destroy the evidence on the laptop and mr. mueller has destroyed evidence. all of that is obstruction of justice and affects the flynn and manafort prosecutions. they destroyed evidence of those cell phones and laptops. that has got to be held to account for that. >> yeah, and he gave immunity to five of clinto

interviewed him to try to put him in a perjury trap, he is dealing with that now even though hillary clintons not president. >> i want you to talk about comparisons and contrast between clinton investigation, and trump investigation went the fbi. of course, -- within the fbi, they gave immunity deals to everyone in hillary clinton's inner circle. and you know that was one tool, where with trump investigation, they rely on surveillance, because, those powers are far too vast for any institution, including the fbi. so, do you see a mark difference there between immunity versus surveillance. >> in case of hillary clinton e-mail investigation, well you who began with a reasonable assumption there was a violation of the law. anwhat fbi did is given immunit, handing it out like candy, whether they had multiple people on false statements up to and including hillary clinton. and russia probe, there is nos every, and course of investigating this you wring up everyone for process crime, investigation itself produces a crime, oh, you lied to us when we asked you tricky questions, they go afternoon ever

because donald trump agreed with how james comey treated hillary clinton in the campaign. it's suddenly when he became his problem that he was sympathetic to hillary. look, that's my concern about this nomination. this is someone who is citing basically fake news around this uranium one allegation. it's from a book by a right-wing political activist that was totally debunked. and so i worry this is just another nomination from donald trump. i agree with scott that it's all about someone that the president has confidence in, but the problem is to have donald trump's confidence, you need to lie. and you need to believe fake news. i think that's who we have in this nominee. >> well, scott, i would give you a chance to respond to that. >> look, i think this guy is going to go answer a bunch of questions from republicans and democrats. everything robby just raised i'm sure the democrats on the committee are going to raise it and he's going to have to answer for it. the way you perform in the confirmation hearings matters. everything that's been brought up, it will be publicly ai

, attacking hillary clinton or attacking president trump's adversary, robert mueller. now, i don't know if there is any connection between the trump presidency or the trump campaign, and what's going on now. but again, it shows how russia's interests are aligned with president trump's interests. >> you know, ken, as a republican politician and leader, are you comfortable that the russian message so often is directly in line with the white house message? >> well, i'm not comfortable with any involvement by the russians. i would note this is all min secu -- minuscule, and jeffrey rattled off what the russians have taken, their disruptive efforts after ferguson, i mean, senator blumenthal mentioned that russia's goal here is to destabilize, and even the knowledge of their involvement is destabilizing. i am uncomfortable with their continual drib drab role in the public discourse in elections. other countries have dealt with them during their elections. the french come to mind as well. this is a clear global strategy on the part of the russians, and i'm not comfortable wit

capitol hill, appearing before a joint house panel who is investigating the doj's handling of the hillary clinton email probe and trump russian investigation. this is "outnumbered," i melissm melissa francis. harris faulkner, katie pavlich, host of candy on the fox business network, kennedy herself. joining us on the couch, my favorite guy. david as men. hosts of "bulls and bears" on the fox business network, weeknights at 5:00 p.m. eastern. thanks for inviting me. >> harris: happy holiday supreme merry christmas. >> david: thank you very much. >> melissa: loretta lynn speaking to the house to do judiciary committee. are republicans looking to compete their work as democrats for her to take the house majority next month. top democrats have vowed to shut these investigations down. a big focus of today's questioning is expected to be loretta lynch's infamous tarmac meeting with former president bill clinton. that meeting went down 90 phoenix airport in 2016, in the midst of the doj's hillary clinton email investigation. just two days ago, former fbi director james comey testified. he also served du

wrapping up their investigation into the fbi, and justice department handling of probes involving hillary clinton'susion during the 2016 election. hot judiciary chairman bob gillett says that clinton got favorable treatment. and house oversight chairman trey gowdy writing in "regrettably it was impacted by protectionism on the part of the doj and fbi. the brief remains that a special counsel should be appointed to not only investigate the decisions made and not made during the president's dependency of the investigation, but the disparate way that the investigations were seemingly conducted." doj inspector michael horwitz was severely critical of james comey's actions as fbi director along with agency officials peter strzok and lisa page paid by found no evidence that politically bias played a role in decision-making. good luck points to the fact that the investigation resulted in several high-profile firings. a demotions, or resignations. among them fbi director andrew mccabe and former fbi director peter strzok. judiciary chair lindsey graham vows to continue the investigation despite democrats s

and two, when you read a transcript, you will see that we were talking again about hillary clinton's emails. so i don't think we need to do this at all, but i am trying to respect the institution and answer the questions in a respectful way. you will see that if you get a transcript of my return visit, which i think will be the week after next. and then this will be over. [indistinct questions] reporter: do have confidence that the attorney general nominee can act with impartiality? director comey: i like and respect bill barr, he cares deeply about the integrity of the justice department, so i am sure he will use the standard career resources he has to judge what he should be involved in and what he should not be involved in. but the bar is a talented person who was a good attorney general the first time, and i think he will serve the justice department while. i am sure he will talk to the career officials about how to it.le reporter: how extensively have you cooperated with the robert mueller investigation at this point? fmr. president obama: i cannot talk about that -- director co