that is profoundly disturbing, should disturb us all. >> you know, hina, i will say, you know, when the case, we played the sound very specifically, because he makes a broader argument that, you know, we can't shield these -- citizenship cannot be a shield for people trying to take down american lives or to end american lives and commit acts of terrorism. and it is a persuasive argument. public sentiment would seem to reflect an agreement with the president. i think according to a gallup poll taken last year, 65% of americans support drone attacks op terrorists abroad, 41% support attacks on citizens who are, quote, unquote, suspected terrorists. the issue here i think to your point, the administration was supposed to be taking -- committing -- ordering these targeted drone strikes based on the notion of imminent threat, which in and of itself is so open to interpretation that it's really subject to any administration to define the term imminent threat. do you think we are on a course -- do you think the administration has set us on any course at all to be more aware of what is happenin

th hina wnrd vement on the are pre.bay doitthr rest we a lki asothg ke biioeus rtofsas n 2014 at.5.ts were looking loofeoe e looki a the vtafoca a sin th a bng nservave. meillyhs yi bon y akss eooids tco joeds steerwh i heoi n? wusse t pka tainabt ei he turbe. iss y a ragyhe reolwi. theyantoetac iohe ofho wd market, er thr rk sreas solute dimed he ty veonin new ceo ca iseemras si uwi aoi vtur th mitbii. e'reoi tdeloth oghe64-v-4 it willumsothg ke00 lln euros inwoheoi nte. -in t jntenre mountsin larg yone aotf naiahe bend you th is onofhe rso ty veone into theoi vtu thitbii av - hedone aair ckg pangacof the wofoe. hase t sreri sri lt ar >> didthk you smu. rho ltengnlobe di bomr's rs rds upex a co hr "e lss mi une. he eluventvi wi ahama wwi tk oureal eat wesk a l obiioir whe eyouut10 lln tirwnon. stf em sdheewss class. an a tfit nc. .rtehe cng th join us. it wille grt nvsaon d you c dre gd r e wod. u n ll monwier im@acqua. weilbeacin cplof minus. ♪ helol lloff ntinues. he clivinrvws thou ai'senalan chf d nae nier bigge bk

important on the part of the leaders of this country to look at the jamie -- changing dynamics in .hina> depending on whether you look , is thee as a group third-largest economy. country. country, it's the second-largest economy. we will be the two largest economies in the world. maybe our growth will determine the health of the world economy along with europe and japan. which is why we all have to look at ways to increase demand and growth on the work together and lower the barriers for trade and raise the standards so we are doing business in a way that improves the environment, instead of the opposite. >> thinking of brazil and emerging nations, what is the future of their economy in the near term? brazil, at turkey, india -- >> you have to look at them individually. what we have seen in the last months is a little differentiation between countries that have taken tough policy decisions and have fiscal policies and structural reforms in their markets. >> who would that be? >> i would rather not name names. if you look at the pool -- performance of currency and performance in the mark